Sure, Lots Of Capitalists Talk This Way

Carlos Watson (who ?) of MSNBC, said this in 2009:






"Today I want to talk about a word that we're hearing more and more, and that's the word socialist. You hear it from a lot of conservatives these days, that's usually critiquing the President, or more broadly Democrats. And while that's certainly a legitimate critique, there certainly is an ideology that can and should be critiqued at certain times, it also some times is just a kind of a generic conservative bludgeoning tool. And that's alright, too, because you hear it on the Democratic side as well: rightwingnut, what have you.

But what concerns me is when in some of those town hall meetings including the one that we saw in Missouri recently where there were jokes made about lynching, etc., you start to wonder whether in fact the word socialist is becoming a code word, whether or not socialist is becoming the new N-word for frankly for some angry upset birthers and others. I hope that's not the case, but it sure does say to you what David Brooks said the other day on T.V., which is that more credible conservatives have to stand up and say that there's a line that has to be drawn, that there's a line of responsibility that's important, and that extends to the words that we choose including how choose even legitimate words like socialist."

From that point on, calling his Chairmanship a socialist was verboten. It was as if Party Member Syme had struck it from the Newspeak Dictionary as far as the Progressiveviks were concerned. Never mind the fact that is was as true as Global Warming theories are false, the Progressiveviks and their allies in the lamestream press repeatedly wagged their finger at anyone who dared to use the new unword. "Racist!" they cried. "Nazi! Homphobe! I'll bet you don't even recycle! Go worship at your Glenn Beck shrine! Go iron your hood and robes!"

 So what do they say now about Chairman Obama's latest gem ? Take it away, Alinskyite Prime:


 "I do think at a certain point you've made enough money."



 Call me crazy and off my meds, but that's not exactly a capitalist attitude, is it ?



 Even Al Sharpton, everyone's favorite race hustler and anti-semite, knows it's true. Over to you, "Reverend" Al:



 "...the American public overwhelmingly voted for socialism when they voted for Barack Obama."




 At the risk of being sent to The Ministry of Love for my hatespeech, I'm going to say it loudly. BARACK OBAMA IS A SOCIALIST! Now, for those of you who are still unconvinced, let's take a little stroll down Cloward and Piven Way and let's look at a few tidbits the Ministry of Truth, er...uh...the lamestream media wanted you to forget :


"And it’s not surprising then they get bitter, they cling to guns, or religion, or antipathy to people who aren’t like them, or anti-immigrant sentiment, or anti-trade sentiments as a way to explain their frustrations"



 "So we're going to provide a $4,000 tuition credit, every student, every year, but, students, you're going to have to give back something in return. You're going to have to participate in community service. You're going to have to work in a homeless shelter, or a veteran's home, or an underserved school or join the Peace Corps." (Funny, in the middle of two wars and all kinds of undeclared shadow wars how he left out joining the military. Another rant for another time.)



 "We can't drive our SUVs and eat as much as we want and keep our homes on 72 degrees at all times...and then expect that other countries are going to say OK"



 "Because our individual salvation depends on collective salvation."



 "I chose my friends carefully. The more politically active black students. The foreign students. The Chicanos. The Marxist professors [empahsis mine] and the structural feminists and punk-rock performance poets" --from Dreams of My Father





(Can anyone imagine our Dear Leader at a Sex Pistols concert ? Neither can I. I think Sid Vicious just rolled over in his grave like the Founders do on a daily basis.)




 "Political discussions, the kind at Occidental had once seemed so intense and purposeful, came to take on the flavor of the socialist conferences I sometimes attended at Cooper Union." From Mao's Little Red Book...er...uh...Dreams of My Father





Of course, we could go on, but why beat a dead socialist horse ? (Don't get me started on that "no one should go broke because they become sick" or "no one should go broke because they go to college" crap, either.)







The handwriting is on the Berlin Wall, folks. We The People are going to be turned into We The Victims.







God help us all.

In This Corner.....

In this corner, from the great state of Texas, he is the Libertarian warrior, scourge of the Fed, making the establishment Republican Party wince, wearing the Revolutionary War officer's uniform, he is, the Conservative Bomber, Ron Paul!




In this corner, from some say Indonesia and some say Hawaii, and some even say Kenya, he is the Chosen One, the bringer of Progressivevik enlightenment, wearing the Hammer and Sickle trunks, he is the dictator...er,uh...President of the United States, I give you Big Mommy himself, Barack Hoooosssseinnnnn Obamaaaaaaaa!





Ladies and Gentlemen and children of all ages.......LET'S GET READY TO RRRRRRUMMMMMBLE!!!!!





--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Rassmussen reported on April 14, in a hypothetical match-up, Chairman Obama and Ron Paul would duel to a near draw if the election were held today. Our Failing Messiah barely edged out Paul, 42-41.



Gee, what does that say about where America is heading and where it wants to be ?



Now, I'm fairly certain Ron Paul would never take the Republican nomination. Within establishment circles, Paul is considered a whack job. His foreign policies, while Constitutionally sound and quite admirable, are the stuff of fantasy. His adamant views on the size of government and killing useless agencies like the Department of Education and the Department of Energy are laudable, but even Ronald Reagan, the greatest American President not named Washington, couldn't pull off their much needed executions.



So what makes Ron Paul so special ?



He's genuine. He's not toeing the party line. He's a principled man fighting the good fight. Americans appreciate that. Ron Paul is the ultimate idealist in a realm of cynics.



Now, why is Chairman Obama falling flat on his face ?



He's not genuine. He's toeing the party line. He's not fighting the good fight at all, he's acting like a bully. Americans certainly don't appreciate that. Obama, too, is an idealist, but he's creating the realm of cynics.



Don't get me wrong: I'm a big Ron Paul supporter and I think he would be the medicine for what ails this country. However, the sanctimonious, traitorous press would never allow his election. That's ok, I can deal wirth the reality of that. I'm a dreamer, but I'm also a realist. But the Republican Party, if they ever want to be revelent again, should be looking towards Ron Paul for guidance. They should get it through their thick skulls that the American people value their cherished Conservative traditions. They don't want new approaches. They don't want new ideas. They want the Constitution followed. The American people are not like the bleeding imbecile Ed Schultz. They certainly don't think the Constitution is outdated.



The reason why Chairman Obama is failing and failing miserably, is the fact that he views the Constitution as a speed bump that's slowing down his mad dash towards becoming an all powerful socialist premier. The Democrat Party, if it wants to remain relevent, needs to abandon the the Progressivevik movement and go back to being the party of JFK. America needs the Democratic Party of old, just like it needs the Republican Party of old. The Eagle can't fly with only one wing. The Democrat Party of today and whatever sloppy mess the Republican has managed to morph itself into are killing our country.



Will either party ever listen to reason ? Of course not. Listening is not considered an important skill for politicians anymore. So to that I say---



God help us all.

The Lonliest Existence

The loneliest political existence on God's green and not to mention scientifically proven cooling earth is that of a Conservative, gun rights supporting, Tea Party attending, angry column writing Jew.

Believe me, I know, I live it every day.

It's a tough go sometimes. The Jewish side of my family thinks I'm a nut job. I can't find a synagogue to worship at since the grand majority of the Rabbis in my area are hopped up on the whole "social justice" thing, which I find to be a perversion of God's Word. In some cases, I'm treated with outright hostility by my fellow Jews. At one point, I've even been called a "Collaborator" which is as low as it gets. (For those of you who were educationally abused by our public school system, this means I would have given the Nazis a helping hand during World War II.)

But you know what ? I'm one tough SOB. I can handle it. You know why ? I believe in God. It's that simple. I don't have superhuman endurance. I've found that when I draw all of my strength from Him, all things are possible, even if I'm considered a pariah by my fellow Jews. I know when I hand The Big Conservative Upstairs the keys, He'll always get me to where I need to go. It may not always be where I want to go, but it's where I need to go, and that's what counts most.

One of the major things that makes me a Conservative is my belief in the Almighty, and one of the major things that makes me fight so hard against the Progressivevik left is their belief in secular humanism. I believe, as the Founders did, that all our cherished rights are a gift from God, secular humanists, like Chairman Obama,  believe they come from government. That doesn't sit well with me. It's like playing God. In my lifetime, I've seen the damage this line thinking can do. Now, I've always lived in the United States, but many a relative of mine had numbers tattooed on their arms. Many of my friends immigrated here from Cuba and have told me horror stories of their lives under Castro. How did Nazism and Communism ever come into existence ? The people of Russia, Germany, Cuba and many other places turned their backs on God. They allowed man to take the place of God. I won't let that happen here. I'll go to my grave before I ever let that happen to our beautiful country.

Yes, the road of a Conservative, gun rights supporting, Tea Party attending, angry column writing Jew is a lonely one. That's fine by me because it's the road God sent me on. He's the best navigator to have.

God help us all.

We need it more than ever.

Sh*tty Deals

I never thought that Carl Marx Levin, the aging Progressivevik Imperial Senator from what's left of Michigan, would ever inspire me to do anything. Well, I was wrong. His near Tourette's Syndrome-like chanting of the word "sh*tty" at some hapless drone from Government Sachs has inspired me to think about the "sh*tty deals" Comrade Carl and his gang have imposed on all of us. Let's take a look see:


--An economic "Stimulus" package that included $198 million for Fillipino WWII veterans and turtle tunnels in Florida.

--A health care plan that some in the media are calling "creeping euthanasia".

--Handing over taxpayer money to the Con Artists Formerly Known As ACORN.

--Attempting to have terrorist dirt bags like Khalid Sheikh Mohammad tried in New York at the cost of $200 million a year.

--The coming Vicious Arbitrary Tax or VAT.

--Throwing American citizens in prison for not wanting to buy insurance.

-- Allowing the appointment of eugenicists like John Holdren, communists like Ron Bloom and Van Jones, and perverts like Kevin Jennings to UNELECTED czar positions.

--Ignoring the fact that Chairman Obama received almost $1 million in campaign donations from Government Sachs. Why isn't Comrade Carl calling that "sh*tty" ?

--Ignoring the fact that Chairman Obama received $60 million in campaign donations from SEIU which seem to have given its head, Andy Stern, unlimited access to the White House and an appointment on the Deficit Reduction Committee. (Even sh*ttier, if you ask me.)

--Allowing Janet From Another Planet Napolitano out of her padded cell to become the head of Homeland Security. (That's not just sh*tty, it's also WTF?!)

--Allowing that Ed Whitacre character to lie in that lame commercial about Government Motors paying back its loan five years early (and with interest, no less) despite the fact that Government Motors lost $6 billion dollars in '09.

Obviously, no one in their right mind is going to defend Government Sachs. Yes, I believe they're a bunch of crooks. However, at this point, can the federal government wag its finger at anyone ? Even the Keystone Kops after a few acid bumps are more competent than the Big Mommy Regime in Washington. Isn't odd how if you call a government mistake "sh*tty" you're a racist, bigot, homophobe, Nazi goosestepper who refuses to recycle, but if you call a mistake made by some Gordon Gekko wannabes "sh*tty", you're all of a sudden a hero to the people and the subject of  the Human Rat Keith Olbermann's most disturbing dreams ?

God help us all.

What In The Hell Do We Need Them For ?

This may sound cliche' or like over heated Right Wing rhetoric, but I have a simple question. I have a question that needs to be asked, consequences be damned.




What in the hell do we even need the federal government for ? At this point, what is it exactly that they do ?





Now, I'm not being a wisenheimer. No, I'm not calling for the violent overthrow of the government, so there's no need to call the O-stapo. There's no firmer believer in the rule of law than me, nor is there a bigger believer in the Constitution than yours truly. The question needs to be asked, especially after Janet From Another Planet Napolitano, the dazed and confused head of Homeland Security, said this about the border security hubbaloo in Beirut...oops...Arizona in an Imperial Senate Hearing:



"[the Arizona / Mexico border is] as secure as ever."



Whatever she's smoking, I'll take a bag and I'll need the dealer's digits for a refill.



That's right Arizona, even though over 450,000 illegal aliens are running around doing God knows what, Janet From Another Planet is claiming that YOUR border is secure. Despite the fact that Phoenix, Arizona is now second in the entire world in kidnappings, Janet From Another Planet is claiming all is well, sort of like the way the captain of the Titanic said, "Don't worry, I know a short cut." Not only that, the Bizzare One also claimed that Arizona's new immigration law would siphon off funds needed to apprehend dangerous illegal aliens. Amazingly, no one lost consciousness during the hearing.



Hold onto your hat, this gets better. Now it's time to skewer the Republicans, who also dropped the ball on this:



John Cornyn, the Socialist-lite Senator ftom the great state of Texas, asked Janet From Another Planet about the five (you read that right, five) unmanned vehicles that are patrolling the borders of the United States. Comrade Cornyn then inquired why two of them are patrolling the US/ Canada border and why none of them were in Texas.



Gee whiz, John, I could be spitballing here, but why didn't you mention this during Bush Error ? Why would you wait until all hell had broken loose with the least cooperative administration that you possibly have had in dealing with this ? What was the delay ?



Now, back to my original question: What in the hell do we even need the federal government for ?



It's obvious the federal government is no longer functioning. Any government that can't control its own borders will crumble, just like the Romans did. Barbarian invasions didn't do the Romans in, it was uncontrolled immigration. (There were invaders like the Huns, of course, but most of the Germanic Tribes that entered Roman territory were actually running from the Huns.) The Romans simply lost control of their borders, just like the Big Mommy REGIME has lost control of ours. We have a federal government that is claiming it doesn't have the money to protect our borders like it's supposed to, but thinks nothing of throwing away 786 billion dollars on a failed "Stimulus" scheme that included turtle tunnels in Florida. We have a federal government willing to throw trillions of dollars into the memory hole on a health care plan that no one wants, but can't seem to find more money for border defense. What's wrong with this picture ?



God help us all. Wait, let me say that again with some meaning.



GOD HELP US ALL!

Sound Familiar ?

In Mein Kampf, Adolf Hitler had this to say about the Jews:

"It is the Jews who govern the stock exchange forces of the American Union. Every year makes them more and more the controlling masters of the producers in a nation of one hundred and twenty millions."

I know what your saying: blah,blah,blah. I already read Liberal Fascism. What's the point ?

Ok. Fair enough. Let's change some words around,

"It is the fat cat bankers who govern the stock exchange of the American Union. Every year makes them more and more the controlling masters of the producers in a nation of three hundred million."

Well, gee whiz, what world leader who also changed his name does that sound like ? I'll give you a hint: He's the star of this column.

Not only should we be studying Saul Alinsky for clues what's in store for us, we should also be looking at other megalomaniacs, like Adolf Hitler, from which many of Chairman Obama's ideas have come from. After all, Hitler promised to fundamentally change Germany, just like our Dear Leader promised to fundamentally change America. Now, don't get me wrong: I'm not one of those wing nut types who believes that the government is going to start running FEMA camps to keep malcontents like me incommunicado. Far from it. I do believe, with every fiber of my diabetic being, that we, the people of the United States, are in for a very rude awakening. If we thought Obamacareless was a doozy, just wait.

Unconvinced ? Let's try another, once again from Mein Kampf:

"All fears regarding the terrible economic consequences of the 'breaking of interest slavery' are superfluous; for in the first place, the previous economic prescriptions have turned out very badly for the German people..."

Call me crazy and off my meds, but that sure sounds like bailing people out from underwater mortgages, "no one should go broke because they're sick", and my personal favorite,"no one should go broke because they choose to go to college."

I'm fully aware that this is just a small snippet, perhaps I'm doing too much reading between the lines for my own good. Coincidences do happen, after all. However, isn't there a call for concern when your elected leader sounds like one of the worst mass murderers in world history ?

God help us all.

Now Can We Call Him A Racist ?

In video distributed by Organizing for America, Chairman Obama called upon the "young people, African Americans, Latinos, and women who powered our victory in 2008 [to] stand together once again."




Now is it safe to say our Dear Leader is a racist ?



Sure, we had the twenty plus years in Jeremiah Wright's church where anti-white rhetoric was the norm, we had then candidate Obama calling his own grandmother "a typical white person", the controversial appointment of Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor of the "wise Latina woman" fame, and oh yes, the "teachable moment" where his Chairmanship had to have a "beer summit" to smooth over the fact that he called small town cops stupid for arresting a black college professor. But during those events, one could never say that Barry the Magnificent was a racist, as Glenn Beck found out. It was racist to imply the Messiah was a bigot.



Well, I'm not going to be scooped again. Barack Hussein Obama, the sitting President of these United States is a bonafide, David Dukes style racist. There. I said it. I'm not taking it back. No, I won't say I was misquoted. No, this column will not go into a memory hole. Our President is a racist. Plain and simple.



You really have to wonder what would happen to George W. Bush if he called for the support of the "older people, white Americans, Europeans, and gunslingers who powered our victory in 2000 [to] stand together once again." Rachel Maddcow would, well, have a cow. Ed Schultz would scream at the top his lungs to his ten viewers. Chrissy Matthews would say something totally unrelated, but you would see the angst in his eyes. As for Keith Olbermann, no one would watch, but it's fairly certain he would have some snarky remark. Where's the outrage from them now ?



This is yet another example of the left's intention to keep us a Balkanized society and a play right out of the Alinsky playbook. Chairman Obama, like the Progressiviks who came before him, realized that a divided society is far easier to control than a united one.



He will only divide us if we let him. The very fact that the President of the United States would ever utter such a divisive statement makes me not only physically ill, but shake my head in disgust and say:



God help us all.

Gotta Love Cato!

Chapter 63 of the Cato Institute's Cato Handbook for Policymakers, 7th edition says this:




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Congress should

-- abolish the U.S. Agency for International Development and

end government-to-government aid programs;



-- withdraw from theWorld Bank and the five regional multilateral



development banks;



-- not use foreign aid to encourage or reward market reforms in



the developing world;



-- eliminate programs, such as enterprise funds, that provide



loans to the private sector in developing countries and oppose



schemes that guarantee private-sector investments abroad;



--privatize or abolish the Export-Import Bank, the Overseas Private



Investment Corporation, the U.S. Trade and Development



Agency, and other sources of international corporate welfare;



--forgive the debts of heavily indebted countries on the condition



that they receive no further foreign aid; and



--end government support of microenterprise lending and nongovernmental



organizations.







--------------------------------------------------------------------------------







Now, they give very good reasons for their lack of support of these foreign aid disasters, such as everyone's favorite Horny Hick Bill Clinton admitting that most of the developing countries in Latin America and Afirica are actually worse off than before the aid began. Now, I'm just a layman and there's no way I can keep up with these intellectual behemoths, but I'll give one very solid reason why I'm against foreign aid: It's simply international socialism.



As a taxpayer, you have two choices: Pay your taxes or go to prison, regardless of what Wesley Snipes thinks. (However, if you're going to be appointed to head the Treasury Department, it's optional.) That money is then doled out to hell holes the world over, like the latest money pit, Haiti. Now, I may not have any fancy schmancy degrees from Haw-vard like Chairman Obama, but how in God's green and not to mention scientifically proven cooling earth is that not the redistribution of wealth that's called for in the tenets of socialism ? The money is taken from me by gunpoint and is handed to someone else that the government deems more worthy of it. Let's go out on a limb and say the money isn't pocketed by some corrupt bureaucrat and actually does something useful, like repair a road damaged by the earthquake, which was not caused by the failure of the Climate Change conference in Copenhagen like noted scientific mind Danny Glover claims. To that, I say: Cui Bono ? Who benefits ? It sure as hell wasn't the taxpayer, who will never travel on it, recieve goods or services on it, or for that matter, ever know it was repaired.



Now, another reason to oppose foreign aid is the all-but-in-the-books VAT tax, which is the the most regressive tax ever proposed in American history. Can we, as a society, truly take money from senior citizens, who thanks to Progressivevik lies and failures were forced into becoming wards of the state by Social Security ? How is that even remotely fair ? How is it fair to take that money and hand it over some Third World hell hole ? Here's another question: How is that even Constitutional ? How can Congress even think to do this ? (You're in need of many years of psychotherapy to believe that money collected from the VAT will be used to pay down the debt. See the Social Security Lockbox for further details.)



As for the recommendations from the Cato Institute on foreign aid, they're all fairly self explanatory. The one I like best is forgiving the debt of foreign nations on the condition they recieve no further aid. This is, by far and away, the most humanitarian way to end foreign aid, since it builds the self-reliance necessary to move a developing country foward. It gives them a fair chance, without having to be a puppet to the Big Mommy Regime in Washington. (For all you Ron Paul types out there: I have a new buzzword for you: Economic Imperialism.)



Now of course, our elected officials will do their best to pretend the Cato Institute and spewers of common sense like me don't exist. (We're unpersons to them.) so---



God help us all.

Who Are They Trying To Kid ?

Recently, the annoying Geico voice over guy, DC Douglas, had this to say about FreedomWorks and the Tea Parties in a cowardly voicemail:










Hi there. I`m doing a paper about FreedomWorks and I was wondering if somebody could give me a call back. I`m wrapping up and I just have one more piece of information I need to get from you guys -- just need to know what the percentage is of people that are mentally retarded who work for the organization, and are members of it. And oh -- and one final thing, wondering what your plans are, how to spin it when one of your members does actually kill somebody, wondering how, if you`ve got an actual P.R. spinning routine planned for that or are you just going to take it when it happens. Just curious. So, give me a call when you get a chance. Thanks so much.





And, Arkansas' Walking Hormone, Bill Clinton, had this to say about the "potential violence" of the Tea Party:





There can be real consequences when what you say animates people who do things you would never do.





How can we forget Nancy Pelosi's alligator tears when she dropped this gem:





I have concerns about some of the language being used [by town hall protesters during last year's Obamacareless debate] because I saw this myself [political violence] in the late 70's in San Francisco.



Now of course it be rude to Speaker of The Shack of Representatives to remind her Lordship that the crimes she is referring to, the murder of Mayor George Moscone and City Manager and gay rights activist Harvey Milk, was actually perpetrated by a Democrat, Dan White. Oops! I just did! Man, I need to hire an editor!



Of course we musn't forget what Janet From Another Planet Napolitano wrote in a "superduper secret memorandum" to law enforcement about "Rightwing Extremism":





Rightwing extremism in the United States can be broadly divided into those groups, movements, and adherents that are primarily hate-oriented (based on hatred of particular religious, racial or ethnic groups), and those that are mainly antigovernment, rejecting federal authority in favor of state or local authority, or rejecting government authority entirely. It may include groups and individuals that are dedicated to a single issue, such as opposition to abortion or immigration.



All of that nonsense leaves me asking one vital question: What violence are they rambling about ? What extremism ? Just what in the hell are these dingbats talking about ?



If the Tea Party is guilty of anything, it would be the occaisonal misspelled sign or very dumb signs like "Keep the government out of my Medicare". None of these people are even remotely capable of violence. Down here in South Florida, the only time Tea Partiers would engage in violence if they missed the early bird special at the Rascal House. We're not talking about fountains of youth here. (Just kidding, Ms. Maddcow. Just kidding. Please don't make another lame documentary. Please for the love of God, don't!)



If anything, the reason why the Progressivevik left is pulling crap like this is: they've lost the debate and they know it. They know Chairman Obama is a dud, the American people are as po'ed as humanly possible, and they need a scapegoat to salvage what they can from the November Whuppin' that is on its way. Now, don't get me wrong, the folks aren't going to all of a sudden forget the Bush Error anytime soon and start getting elephant tattoos, but the bottom line is the usual Republican incompetence is a whole heap better than Socialist incompetence. This is apparently their way of raising a white flag while saving face.



We're on their tails, folks. They're retreating, not reloading. (Zing!)





Still, in the face of this stupidity, I must say:





God help us all.

They're At It Again!

The Associated Depressed has just announced that Archie Comics will have its first openly gay character, named Kevin Keller. Kevin will beat Jughead in a hamburger eating contest and win Veronica's heart in the process. Kevin will then have to find a way to break to Veronica that he's gay. Jon Goldwater, Archie Comics' Co-CEO says of the new character's introduction is about "keeping the world of Archie Comics current and inclusive."




Um...Archie Comics are for kids, right ?



Well, not anymore.



Why is it as a society are we rushing kids into adulthood ? To be honest, being an adult sucks. Why can't we let kids be kids ? There will be plenty of time for them when they get older to ponder the issues of the day. Why is this even necessary ? What's next, Reggie gives Betty an STD at the prom ? Jughead becomes morbidly obese due to his eating habits and goes into a diabetic coma ? Archie trades in his jalopy in a "cash for clunkers" deal ? Maybe Moose will be outed for being on steroids. Does everything have to be politically correct these days ?



It doesn't take a Benjamin Spock to realize we are forcing kids to grow up way too fast. That's a shame, because being a kid is a lot of fun. We aren't raising children anymore, we're training the next wave of solidiers for the lefty/Righty war. We shouldn't be indoctrinating children with crap like this. (I would be just as annoyed if there was a "Tea Party" issue as well.) Archie Comics should be ABSOLUTELY ashamed of themselves for allowing itself to go from an American icon to yet another piece of valueless politicalcorrectthink garbage. Once again, children are forced to take to take the backseat so the adults who have screwed up the world can feel better about themselves.



I realize this is but a blip on everyone's radar screen. I get it. It's not sexy like chasing down the lunatics at the Westboro Baptist Church. It's not as exciting as John Edwards' sexual romps. But it is a definite sign that things have gone too far, and really, who is looking out for the kids in all of this hubbaloo ?



God help us all.

Dennis The Leftist Menace

Recently, Dennis Kucinich (Socialist-Mars) had this to say to Asian News International about the drone strikes that are vaporizing al-Qaeda and Taliban terrorists: "[We are heading] into an area of unaccountability that leads to blowback, where we actually lose friends, where we inspire anti-American sentiments and fanaticism and radicalism."




In other words, Dennis doesn't want terrorists killed.



One of the things that drives me nuttiest about these Progressiveviks is their lack of understanding of how the world works. What does he want the military to do ? Send them a dozen roses and a box of chocolates ? Is he for real or is he just playing devil's advocate ? What congressman in his right mind would say this with young Americans putting their lives on the line ? What congressman would say this to a foreign news agency knowing full well that it would get back to the enemy ? Really, whose side is he on, anyway ?



One thing I will give Chairman Obama props for is continuing the drone strikes. They save the lives of infantrymen. (Leave it to a whackjob like Kucinich to force me to defend Obama.) Not only that, they bring the fear of God to our enemies. They never know when it's coming and by the time they do realize it, they're worm food. What's wrong with that ? Yes, there are civilian casualties, but right now, that can't be a worry. If the Afghan War is lost, al-Qaeda and or the Taliban will get their grubby paws on nuclear weapons which will not only destabilize the region, but the entire world. The mission in Afghanistan should not be making friends. It should be about stopping al-Qaeda once and for all before they get their hands on nuclear weapons and kill millions of people.



God help us all if Mars allows Dennis Kucinich to once again disgrace Congress in 2010.

Seditious, You Say ?

Recently, Joe Klein of Time Magazine, has stated that the remarks of Sarah Palin and the human cartoon character known as Glenn Beck "rub right up close to seditious."




God bless you, Joe! You're a cure for writer's block!



Seditious ? In what way ? I'll play along, Joe. Just kindly show me a quote where either Beck or Palin call for the violent overthrow of the government and you'll win. Mmmhmm....Still waiting, Joe.....Mmmmhmmm....Can't find a single quote, can you ?



See, all this hubub comes from the fact that Progressiveviks like Klein, Chrissy Matthews, Rachel Maddcow, and The Human Rat Keith Olbermann still think it's 2008 and we should all genuflect to Chairman Obama like he does to foreign monarchs. To Joe, any criticism of Chairman Obama and his half-cocked socialist schemes is at very least, racist, and at very worst, seditious. On the contrary, it is a very patriotic thing to do. After all, didn't Thomas Jefferson say : "Dissent is the highest form of patriotism" ?



Really, Joe, you're an educated man. What harm is there in saying: "No, I don't want to pay for my neighbor's mortgage. No, I'm not paying for his health care, either. I don't want to spend one penny to send his kid to college. No, I can decide for myself what lightbulbs to use. No, you're not taking my guns, either. I'll say what I want, eat what I want, smoke what I want, and yeah, I'll use all the salt I want." ?

Is that seditous ? That's the basic mantra of Beck and Palin, and you know what else, Joe ? It's the mantra of a little place we call America. You should come visit once in a while. We'd love to have you.



God help us all.

Arizona's Immigration Stinker

This just in: Arizona's immigration bill is now law.




You won't find yours truly celebrating.



Now, don't get me wrong. I haven't gone soft. Illegal immigration is one of this country's biggest problems. Yes, illegals are bringing their crime wave with them from Mexico. Yes, I think the military should be guarding our border. (Instead of, Oh I don't know, playing meals on wheels in Haiti, for example.) But is this the only answer we have to such a complicated issue ? Can we as Conservatives laud giving any government the right to stop anyone and ask them for their papers ? We're better than that, folks.



As far I'm concerned, when the government, whether it's state or that behemoth we call the federal government, violates the civil rights of one of us, it violates the rights of all of us. Now, I'm not talking about the fence jumpers, they should go to prison, no question about it, they did break our country's law. Now, the little old lady who immigrated to the States from Mexico legally twenty years ago, should not have to produce papers on demand. That's who I'm worried about. She shouldn't be profiled due to her ethnicity. That's just wrong, and a tad too Nazis occupying Poland for me.



There are many remedies for illegal immigration like severe penalties for hiring illegal aliens, placing a humongous tax on monies wired to Mexico by illegal aliens, severe penalties for renting to illegal aliens, and the like. Of course, having the military patrol our border wouldn't be a shabby idea either. If they don't get across, they don't become illegal. Crazy idea, I know. I'm fairly certain that's why the military exists, to defend our borders. I believe I read that somewhere.



The real villian in this mess isn't the state of Arizona, or its legislature. It's our bloated federal government that's at fault here. Maybe, just maybe, if the federal government wasn't so worried about what lightbulbs we're using, or what the correct flush volume for toilets should be, illegal immigration might not have become such a problem. Maybe if the federal government did its damn job once in a while, knee jerk laws like the one that was passed in Arizona wouldn't be necessary.



Don't get me wrong. I am dead against amnesty for illegal aliens. (Yes, Lindsey, we do "own this".) I think illegal aliens should recieve jail time and one way tickets back to where they came from. At the same time, since when in America do we punish all citizens for the crimes of a few ?



God help us all.

Two Plus Two Makes....

"Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two make four. If that is granted, all else follows." --Winston Smith's diary from George Orwell's novel, Ninteen Eighty-Four




If I didn't know any better, I'd say George Orwell was the first member of the Tea Party, woudn't you ?



That's the whole platform of the Conservative movement in a nutshell. If anything, Conservatism is not a political theory. It's more than understanding the mistakes of our forefathers. It is the application of common sense to the day-to-day operation of government. With the Progressivevik left, it's the ABSOLUTE opposite. Let's take a stroll down Progressivevik Lane, shall we ?



--Global Warming has gotten so far out of control, the winters are becoming more vicious and colder.



--We can extend health care coverage to 30 million more people and save money. No one's costs will go up and there will be no rationing of services.



--Despite the threats of committing genocide against Israel, the Iranian government can be trusted to act in a civil way



--Raising energy taxes will save the environment.



--The economy will recover despite the coming VAT tax.





We could go on and on, but some of those examples I've listed above are some of the chief culprits in the assault on our common sense. Whether you're a rabid Right Winger clinging to your guns and Bible because you're bitter, or you're a dope smoking lefty marching to save the web footed green swamp whatever, the point is: None of this makes the least bit of sense, does it ?



What the federal government is up to is more than the usual lefty/Righty nonsense. It's all about control, plain and simple. If you think driving a Prius with a Change bumper sticker will save you, you're clinically insane. What the federal government is attempting to do is create a system where, they, not you, the individual, will have the power. This is the antithesis of our country's founding principals. Whether you're a Conservative or a liberal, you should be very concerned with the role the federal government will soon have in your life. What's being proposed and what has already been passed is far beyond the lefty/Righty system we have now. What is taking place in our government now is far beyond those tired arguments, it is becoming a fascist take over, with all of our civil rights being stomped into dust, or like a human face being stomped on by a boot forever.



God help us all if more people don't realize two plus two make four....

Winston Minus The Notebook

Recently, I made a decision. No internet, no Glenn Beck, Rush Limbaugh, or Mark Levin radio shows. I wanted to know what it would be like to live under Chairman Obama's Chavez-like media manipulations, such as Net Neutrality and the Fairness Doctrine. After all, like the old saying goes, you can't write about what you haven't experienced, right ?






Ok...Ok...turn off your BS detector. My laptop is in the shop. (I'm fairly certain my new and interesting friends at gaynewservice.com and GLSEN were all sending each other secular messages of joy knowing I was down for a while.)





However, everything I've written in the above paragraph is true. I can't listen to AM radio in my apartment because the reception sucks. As for the internet, well, if I don't have a computer, it's fairly impossible to access the web. (No, I'm not going to the library to shove someone off of a computer who's looking for a job.) In any event, the moment my computer went down, I felt like I was Winston Smith and someone stole my notebook. I was helpless. No access to free information. I was at the mercy of others and their view of events, and more importantly, I was unable to give my view on the day's events.



In other words, I was living the life that Obama Hood and his Merry Band of Socialists has in store for all of us.



Make no mistake about it: The Obama Plan for the media would do just that. It would silence the millions of voices like mine who are screaming "WTF are you doing ?" at the top of our lungs. Net Neutrality would mold the internet into an Obama lovefest and the Fairness Doctrine would effectively kill talk radio. First Amendment, you say ? How cute and naive. Remember when Chairman Obama had a hissy fit about how the Supreme Court struck down the unconstitutional parts of Campaign Finance Reform ? (You know, the hissy fit he had at the State of Confusion Address when he called out the Supreme Court and had his Progressivevik allies hooting and hollering like they were on their way to an Ann Coulter book burning.) That little episode showed how little regard our Dear Leader has for Free Speech, as did his remarks about the Tea Party. Oh, I'd be remiss in my duties if I failed to mention how the Failed Messiah appointed Mark Lloyd to head the FCC's "diversity" department. You remember Mr, Lloyd, don't you ? Gosh, his praise for the way Hugo Chavez handles the media down in Venezuela just sends thills up my leg.



Folks, if thers's only one thing that worries you about Chairman Obama's agenda, this should top of the list. Free Speech is a gift, not from the Founders, but from God Himself. It is the most precious thing He has ever given to a nation. It is a gift that we should never, ever, let anyone take away from us.



God help us all.

Leave The Kids Alone, Damn it!

In case you missed it, yesterday was GLSEN's (Gay, Lesbian, and Straight Education Network) "Day of Silence" in the schools. The GLSEN gang had students be silent for the whole day to show their solidarity with their gay classmates.

The whole thought of it just turns my stomach, and no, I'm not a bigot.

Let me save some of you some time: No, I'm not a hate monger who hums the Horst Wessel song while ironing my hood and robes. No, I'm not anti-gay, and yes, I would still love my kids if they turned out to be gay, I promise. Yes, bullying in our public schools is a definite problem, no question about it.

See, the reason why this makes my blood boil is the fact that, once again, the Overbearing Opposition is using children to push their social engineering agenda. On the Day of Silence website, there's even a section on how to get middle school kids involved in this insanity. The website even encourages kids to lobby their school administrators for approval. Really ? Has it really sunk to this new low ?

Now of course, they'll be those who congratulate the kids for taking a stand. But what if I tried to organize a "day of silence" for the troops killed in Iraq or Afghanistan ? I'd be called a war monger. What if I tried to organize a "day of silence" for the 9/11 victims ? I'd be accused of ratcheting up hatred towards Middle Eastern students. God only knows what happen if I tried to organize a "day of silence" to recognize our Constitution. I'd probably have an appointment with Party Member O'Brien at the Ministry of Love.

Here's something for the gang at GLSEN to consider: Every one of the major religions in the United States (Christianity, Judaism, and Islam) consider homosexuality a sin. This sort of display has the potential to offend a deeply religious student. Who's standing up for their rights ? It sure as hell wouldn't be the ACLU, that's for sure. Sure, the ACLU will go to the mat to allow Nazis to march on Skokie, Illinois, but when was the last time they went to the mat for anyone's religious rights ? I know this may leave some people puzzled, but there are religious people in this world and they have a right not be offended, whether GLSEN likes it or not.

Folks, stopping bullying and harassment is the job of adults, not kids. Children are not protest signs on legs. You want to protest sexual orientation inspired bullying ? Fine, I'm with you on that. Organize a protest outside of the school on the weekend. Go to a PTA meeting. Call the principal. Just leave the kids out of it. Let them be kids, for God's sake, not pawns in some political/ social engineering game where the only losers are the kids. (Call me crazy and off my meds, but aren't schools supposed to be for learning reading, writing, and becoming a useful a citizen, not a Progressivevik drone ?)

God help us all.

Thank You !?

At a Miami fundraiser on Tax Day, our clueless Dear Leader remarked how he was "amused" by the Tea Party protests and said "You would think they should be saying thank you."

No, you read that right. We should be thanking him.

WHAT AN ELITIST JERK!

THAT'S RIGHT, RACHEL MADDCOW! I CALLED HIM A JERK! DID YOU HEAR THAT CHRISSY MATTHEWS ? I CALLED HIM A JERK! HOW ABOUT YOU, OLBERMANN ? PUT DOWN THE BASEBALL CARDS FOR A SECOND, I JUST CALLED YOUR TIN POT DICTATOR OF A MESSIAH, A JERK!

Now, let's really examine how dangerous of a statement that actually is. We have the President of the United States demanding tribute from his subjects. We just got a glimpse of what an ego maniac this guy truly is. This man thinks we should thank him for what damage he's done to our country. We should thank him for letting us supposedly keep our own money ? What's next, pageants for the Wise Leader ? Children singing hosannas to his benevolent nature ? (Oops. We already had that. My mistake.) Does this man think he's our ruler ?

Here's a news flash for you, Chairman Obama. We are Americans. Unlike you, we don't bow to anyone. Regardless of what you think, you work for us, not the other way around. We owe you no allegience. You are not a fuhrer, a Caesar, or anything remotely approaching that. Yes, you are the President of The United States. No one can dispute that, nor should they. Keep in mind, however, we as American citizens gave you your power and we, the American citizens, have every right to take it away from you in your next election. We are not bound to you for life. (And judging by the polls, you'd best keep that in mind.)

You know it's funny, despite all the accusations of George W. Bush being a dictator, I never heard anything even remotely as arrogant as this. As much as Bill Clinton annoyed me, I never heard anything like that. Quite frankly, as much as I strain my recollection, I can't think of one President, even Woodrow the Horrible, saying anything remotely this arrogant and unseemly. No, I'm not being partisan here. I really can't think of any statement this insulting to citizens of the United States.

Instead of attending $35,000 fundraisers, (Apparently, you have all kinds of free time on your hands despite two wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, undeclared shadow wars all over the globe, 9.7% unemployment, an economy that makes Sierra Leone look like an economic juggernaut, and I almost forgot, an unconstitutional occupation of Haiti.) Chairman Obama, maybe you should try talking to the Tea Party movement instead of talking down to them. Regardless of what you think of yourself, you don't have all the answers. With this latest show of arrogance, I honestly don't think you even know what the question is. The most important thing any leader should do everyday is listen. I promise, your Lordship, the Tea Party folks won't bite. (That's something your drones do when angry or confused.) I can assure you if you had a three hour Town Hall with these folks, you'd learn quite a bit. They'll tell you plenty of things your toadies David Axelrod and Valerie Jarrett won't or can't tell you. You'd find that these folks aren't opposing your misguided and reckless policies out of spite or because they're racists. They're patriots standing up to the tyranny of government, just like the Founders, or Dr. Martin Luther King. That's not a bad thing. That's a very healthy, American view of government and its role in our lives.

Another thing you'd discover, Chairman Obama, is that Americans are a very forgiving bunch. So what if we've gotten off to such a rough start ? You can still change course and fix things, and you know what, we'll all love you for it. (See Bill Clinton for further details.) If you take a moment to actually listen to us and act accordingly, you'd have the entire electorate eating out of your hand. The Tea Party exists as a reaction to YOUR policies. Not George W. Bush's. Not Bill Clinton's. Not Old Man Bush's. Not Reagan's. YOURS. It is you who has created the Tea Parties, not Rick Santelly.

What's it going to be, Chairman Obama ? Arrogance or governance ?

I have a funny feeling I already know the answer, so God help us all.

Crony Journalism

We've all heard of crony capitalism, you know, the less than desirable state of affairs that we have now in which corporations become yet another tentacle of the Big Mommy federal government REGIME in exchange for not being shut down. However ugly that may be, there's something even uglier than crony capitalism.

 

 

Crony journalism.

 

 

In the April 15th edition of  South Florida's Daily Worker...I mean Sun Sentinel, the following yellow journalism found its way onto the front page, just under the fold:

 

"Coffee Party seeks civility in discourse" with bylines that read "A movement with manners" and "Activists find tea party too bitter for their taste"

 

Gee--I wonder what side the Sentinel is on.

 

The article, written by an unperson named Anthony Man, does the usual moan about the Tea Party Movement, how they're uncivil, use heated rhetoric, the Tea Party is alienating people, blah, blah, blah, Progressivevik whining, blah,blah blah. That obviously isn't news, we've heard all of that since Rick Santelly had his famous blow up on CNBC. I'll give credit where credit is due, in the story at least Man didn't call the folks "teabaggers", Rachel Maddcow's endearing term for patriotic Americans who stand up to the bloated pig we call government, but it was a vicious hit piece masquarading as journalism nonetheless.

 

In this insult to free journalism, Man claims that hundreds across South Florida were flocking to coffee joints all over to show homage for the Big Mommy REGIME in Washington. He reports with due reverence that 30 people showed up at some joint named Brew Urban Cafe. So, a moderately busy day at Starbucks is now front page news (Don't worry, the Tea Party was given a blurb right next to this article that says their protest will block traffic and cause delays.), but the thousands who have been to Tea Party events throughout South Florida is never front page news. To quote any random 12-year old: "WTF ?"

 

To make matters worse, much worse, Man writes: "...Coffee Party activists want to show that many people still have faith in government and that it's possible to diagree without being disagreeable" Now, he's not quoting Annabel Park, the documentary filmmaker who came up with this lame Coffee Party idea (It should be noted that Park was a Chairman Obama volunteer during the '08 Popularity Contest.), he's actually opining, and that should never, ever happen on the front page of any newspaper. Any reasonable scan of Gallup, Rasmussen, Quinnipiac, or any other respected poll shows the exact opposite, from the leftiest of liberals to the Rightiest of Conservatives, almost everyone with two functioning brain cells is losing faith in the federal government. That's an undeniable fact, just like it's an undeniable fact that one can't use the word "many" to descibe 30 people at a coffee joint.

 

If this is what journalim has devolved into, God help us all. A functioning, non biased press is vital to the survival of the Republic.

 

More Big Government On The Way!

The next person who says our Dear Leader, Chairman Obama is not a socialist, I am going to personally hold them down and tattoo his latest, frightening quote to their forehead:

"If there's one lesson that we've learned, it's an unfettered market where people take huge risks and expect taxpayers to bail them out when things go sour is simply not acceptable."


Never mind the fact that our less than illustrious Messiah voted for the bailouts when he was a part-time Imperial Senator, we've all learned to expect, and in some circles, accept his Ingsoc-like changing of truths. What bothered me was his use of the word "unfettered". Um, Barry The Magnificent, when in the hell over the last 100+ years have we ever had "unfettered" capitalism ? Ever since your Progressivevik ancestors emerged from the primordial ooze of failed European political theories, we've had nothing but "fetterred" capitalism, often with disastrous results, like oh, I don't know, the Community Reinvestment Act of 1977.

Now, don't get me wrong: we actually do need financial regulation. So, here it goes, and I'll even keep it under the 1900+ pages that is Chris Dudd's Frankenstein monster of a bill:

If a corporation does something stupid, it dies like an old person waiting for medical care under the Obamacareless plan. The federal government won't give them one dime, just like it won't let Grandma see her 89th birthday.

Any CEO caught screwing the public should be forced to view pictures of Ed Schultz bathing Keith Olbermann while wearing a French Maid's uniform. That, I can assure you, would scare anyone straight.



Seriously, it's that simple.

 

What our Dear Leader and his socialist allies like Chris Dudd and Barney Fwank don't realize is (cue nolstalgic Reagan music): Government is the problem. Anytime in the last 100 years we've had any sort of financial meltdown, there's always some bureaucrat shrugging his shoulders and saying "Did I do that ?" The problem is when Urkel said it, it was in a moderately funny way. When Barney Fwank says it, it means your pension and life savings are gone, like my faith in the government.

 

Under Angelo's BFF's scheme, Big Mommy would set up yet another government agency that would watch the evil capitalists and force them into bankruptcy if they're deemed "too big to fail." Naturally, this wouldn't be how the agency will be used at all, it would be used as a compliance mechanism to force corporations to do the government's bidding. If you think crony capitalism is ugly now, wait until corporations become yet another tentacle of the federal government.

 

 

Gee.....where have I heard of a system like that ? Could it be.....Socialism ?

 

 

Even if you're a little skittish about laissez faire capitalism, consider this: corporations are always at war with each other, like the Oceania/Eurasia/Eastasia three way dance. Only the strong would survive in a true laissez faire system. The weak would either fold or be bought out by the strong, thus eliminating the need for bailouts. When a company becomes too big, it will crash and burn under the weight of its own bureaucracy, thus eliminating the need for any stringent financial oversight. That's the beauty of true capitalism, it polices itself. 

 

I'm going to appeal to the Republicans in Congress, although I'm fairly certain to be disappointed yet again, fight this with everything you  have. Fillibuster. Name call. Be obstructionist. Give Moron Dowd a nervous break down, I don't care. Whatever you do, you must fight this tooth and nail. If financial reform passes in any way, shape, or form, free market capitalism will no longer exist in the United States.

 

Yes, it's that serious.

 

 

 

 

Nanny Nanny Boo-Boo

The effort to repeal Proposition 8 has failed to reach the November ballot in California.

 

On this breaking news, I have this to say: Nanny, nanny, boo-boo, stick your head in doo-doo.

 

Now, I'm sure there will be those who call me a hate monger for saying that. I'm fairly certain Rachel Maddcow would send me to the Ministry of Love for reeducation in how to play nice with others and toe the Progressivevik line. I'm fairly certain Moron Dowd would sign off on my death warrant if she could for daring not have secular humanist values. Maybe they'll force me to watch the Ed Show for my crimes against humanity, a punishment even Rudolf Hess would not have deserved.

 

To be fair, gay marriage would not effect my life in any way. Like Thomas Jefferson, noted Rightwing Extremist, said "it neither picks my pocket nor breaks my leg." Really, I don't care what two consenting adults do in the privacy of their own homes. I could care less if two adults have Eric Massa-inspired tickle fights. I simply don't care. It's none of my business, just like it's no one's business what my wife and I do in the privacy of our own home.

 

What I do mind is this effort made by the Progressivevik left to make the rest of us accept their values or lack thereof. That's what the pro-gay marriage gang really want. They want to replace our Judeo-Christian values with their secular-progressive values. They want to replace what Western Civilization has taught us for the last 5000 years and replace it with their psycho-babble. They honestly think we should say "Enough with the Bible nonsense, we need to go a different route." That's what gay marriage is all about. It isn't about individual rights, since Progressiveviks sure as hell don't believe in that, it's all about control. It's about using the hammer of government to make moral choices for the governed. The pro-gay marriage gang is no different than the Jerry Falwell types they loathe in that respect. They want to make moral choices for the people, and that strikes me as wrong, no matter what side does it. I, like the grand majority of Americans, don't need anyone else to make my choices for me. I can be trusted to make my own judgement calls, thank you very damn much.

 

Isn't it great when Liberty defeats tyranny ? It always sends a thrill up my leg. Or is that diabetic neuropathy ? Maybe the death panels will allow me to find that out or maybe they won't.

This Just In From The AP: The Economy Sucks

Recently, the Associated Depressed shook off the shackles of the Ministry of Truth and decided to tell the truth for a change. They reported, through 2011 that unemployment will drop to 9.3% at best, home sales will remain flat, and the economy will only grow by 3%. (The only reason it will grow by that teenie-weenie bit is the fact that the federal "government" is spending like a bunch of, well, drunken Progressiveviks taking bong hit after bong hit, and we're not talking about the cheap stuff, either.)






However, today's column isn't about skewering the Associated Depressed, despite the fact that they're reporting news a year too late. It's time to skewer, yet again, Chairman Obama's economic illiteracy. If this guy owned a funeral home, no one would die, even with the creeping euthanasia that he tries to pass off as "health care reform".



Call me crazy and off my meds, but wasn't the "Stimulus" plan supposed to ward this off ? After all, with a 786 billion dollar price tag, shouldn't it have cured all of our economic ills ? To hear Schmoe Biden speak, you'd think it cured leprosy, helped the blind to see, and raised the dead. I mean, after all, one doesn't have to be a Paul Krugman to see that logic, right ? (Actually, one does. Someone really needs to explain to me how handing 198 million smackers to Fillipino World War II veterans will stimulate our economy or how Krugman remains employed or how he won a Nobel Peace of Garbage prize.)



Well, folks, I hate to break it to you, but things are going to get worse. If you think things are lousy now, wait until the Vicious Arbitrary Tax (VAT) makes its grand appearance. Add that to the taxes Obamacareless will bring us, and let's not forget Cap and Traitor that's the cat's meow of Lindsey Grahamnesty and John McPain. Soon, every dollar you earn will be under the control of the federal "government". At this rate, we'll need a Stimulus plan to recover from the Stimulus plan. Change, you say ? The only change that will be left will be the change that Obama Hood and his Merry Band of Socialists allow you to have.



It's funny, not haha funny, more like what's that funny smell funny, every time the "government" tries to help it has only succeeded in making this worse, to the nth degree. It's kind of like when I was a kid and I annoyed my mother. She would tell me through clenched teeth to help my father who was screwing up on purpose so he would never be asked to do anything again. This is the same lunacy that our "government" bases its policies on. They have to be screwing up on purpose, right ?



Gulp....Right ?

Do We Have To Go Over This Again ?

Recently, while filling in for The Human Rat Keith Olbermann, Dylan Ratigan, whoever the hell he is, had Mark Williams, a Tea Party organizer on his show that had 12 Progressivevik Drones glued to their TV. It was the same old "Why do you hate blacks and Jews ?" Blah, blah, blah, Progressivevik whining, blah, blah, blah.




This is getting old, but I feel the need to once again address this idiocy at the risk of putting you, my dear reader, in a coma. For those of you who are sick and tired of this, I apologize, but I'm afraid we'll have to tread down this path once again.



I've been to a few Tea Parties in my time. You know what ? No one yelled at me, "Get lost Jew!" No one yelled at the blacks in attendance. No one yelled at the Hispanics in attendance. They did yell "keep your grubby hands off my health care!" They did yell "keep your paws off of my guns!" But nothing that would get Robert Byrd motivated enough to ditch his walker and take his hood and robes out of the closet. No one was chanting the crap that the Westboro Baptist Church has been spewing, that's for sure. Between protecting their health care and preserving their God given right to bear arms, they were waving Allen West signs and chanting for Marco Rubio. For those of you who aren't following Florida politics, Marco Rubio is Cuban American and Allen West is black. None of the Tea Partiers cared about what race they were, they cared about what these fine gentlemen stand for: Real American values.



I think what bugs the Progressivevik Democrat Party the most, and the reason they spew the lies and hatred about the Tea Party is simple: The Tea Party is doing the job of the old Democratic Party used to do. It is the Tea Party, not the Progressivevik Democrat Party that is standing up for the middle class. It is the Tea Party, not the Progressivevik Democrat Party, that decries the crony capitalism of the Bailouts and the shifty deals being cooked up with Cap and Trade. It is the Tea Party, not the Democrat Progressivevik Party trying their damnedest to rescue Medicare. Boy oh boy, are those Tea Party folks a bunch Rightwing Extremists, or what ? (If you don't believe me, Rasmussen has discovered that over 40% of the Tea Party are either Democrats or Independents.)



What aggravates me the most is when I see limo riding Progressiveviks like Olbermann, Janeane Garofolo, this Ratigan dork, and Nancy Pelosi attack the little old ladies and old World War II vets who show up at the rallies. It makes my blood boil becase these elitist snobs are insulting someone's grandma or grandpa. Have these elitist jerks forgotten that it's these folks who actually count and not them or their rambling ? It's folks like the waitress who knows her customers' names by heart who matter. It's the hockey mom who juggles practice and dance recital who matters. It's the sheriff who pulled me over for having a broken tail light who matters. Why, even the annoying telemarketer who annoys you at dinner time matters more than these people, and I use that term loosely. Keith Olbermann and his dorky baseball card collection doesn't matter. Janeane Garofolo and her failed acting career doesn't matter. Nancy Pelosi will be a political unperson come November. Dylan Ratigan ? Well, I still don't know who he is, and frankly, I'm not going to bother Googling him. If these people want to take a swipe at anyone, I'm right here. My writing career could use the boost. Lay off the real people, you phonies!



Folks, one last thing: please, whatever you do, don't email me to tell me who Dylan Ratigan is. I just don't care.

Look Out For St. Wallis

For over a year, I've warned that the the Progressivevik left will stop at nothing in their march towards making America a socialist dystopia. They'll stoop to any low possible to reach that goal. They'll call you a bigot, a Nazi, and a homophobe. They'll threaten you with a beating from purple shirted thugs. They'll register Emmitt Smith, Troy Aikman, and Mickey Mouse to vote. They'll even bite off a couple of fingers to make a point.




Hey, I'm ok with all of that. I'm one tough SOB and I dare anyone to try to bite off my finger.



However, attempting to pervert religion, well, that's just hitting below the belt. And that's the Progressiveviks' new strategy to enslave us all to their whims.



Let's take this year's version of Van Jones, Jim Wallis, Chairman Obama's "spiritual advisor" and Glenn Beck target, a rabid communist and all around spooky dude, for example. He's all hopped up on that "social justice is actually a Christian belief" lie. He writes in the HuffingtonPuffington Post:



"... voluntary church action can't provide health care for millions who don't have it, or fix broken urban school systems, or provide jobs at fair wages, or protect our kids from toxic air, water, and toys, or fix a broken immigration system that is grinding up our vulnerable families, or keep banks from cheating our people. "



Um, Comrade "Preacher", that's not what churches, synagogues, or mosques are meant to do. Those are political problems, not spiritual ones. Houses of Worship aren't political thinktanks, they're guides to shepherd the faithful into doing the right thing VOLUNTARILY. That means, no gun at your back, no threats of jail time, or long or short forms. That means helping the little old lady push her stalled car off the road. That means helping the old guy next door bring his groceries upstairs. That means loaning your friend a couple of bucks until payday and telling him not worry about paying you back if you can afford it. It means being equitable and fair in all your dealings. Nowhere in the Bible does it say anything about forcibly taking another person's property and giving to those who don't deserve it. "Love thy neighbor" does not mean "Pay all his bills while he lives a life of leisure while you work yourself to death."



Hey, I'm no expert. God is. Let's hear His views on the subject:



"The hand of the diligent shall bear rule: but the slothful shall be under tribute."-- Proverbs 12:24







"But if any provide not for his own, and specially for those of his own house, he hath denied the faith, and is worse than an infidel."--

1 Timothy 5:8





"Let him that stole steal no more: but rather let him labour, working with his hands the thing which is good, that he may have to give to him that needeth." Ephesians 4:28



And my personal favorite:



"For even when we were with you, this we commanded you, that if any would not work, neither should he eat." 2 Thessalonians 3:10





Isn't it weird how three of those quotes came from the New Testament ? Regardless of Jim Wallis thinks, the welfare called for by the mantra of social justice is actually abhorrent to Christianity and Judaism, the two dominant religions in the United States. (No, I'm not leaving out Islam out of spite. I'm just not familiar enough with the Koran to quote it correctly. I have too much respect for any religion to misuse any quotes from its Holy Scripture. If there are any Muslims out there who can provide me with quotes to prove my point, drop me a line. I only bite Progressiveviks, not my fellow Monotheists.)



See, the seperation of church and state, while not in the Constitution, is an important concept that we must value and cherish. No, I'm not saying we should call the ACLU anytime someone puts up a Nativity Scene at city hall. Far from it. What I am saying is that the division of church and state is an important concept so that religion isn't twisted by maniacs like this Jim Wallis character. When was the last time you heard any preacher worthy of the title say this: "The media seems to think only abortion and gay marriage are religious issues. Poverty is a moral issue, it's a faith issue, it's a religious issue."



Wrong, Jimbo. It's an issue created by the lie of social justice and the failures of Progressiveviks like you.

Unintended Consequences

Most Progressiveviks are drones, incapable of rational thought, sort of like Keith Olbermann or Ed Schultz. They take their marching orders from the higher ups in the plot to rob Americans of their liberty, like George Soros and Oprah Winfrey. They nod like automatons and chant slogans like "Yes We Can" and "Workers of The World Unite". Some are like Chairman Obama, who also takes his marching orders from Soros and Winfrey, but are waaay smarter than Olbermann and Schultz. (If you forget, our arrogant and dismissive Dear Leader will be the first to remind you. You can take that to staright to the government- controlled bank.)




However, despite being smarter than all of us proles, they constantly forget one of the most important thoughts ever recorded in human history. "For every action, there is an equal and opposite reaction." For the victims of our public school system out there, this would be Sir Isaac Newton's Third Law of Motion. Like all of their other foul-ups, it has had deadly and disastrous consequences.



Let's use America's favorite fascist Woodrow Wilson as the prime example. Herr Wilson thought it would be a swell idea to keep Germany from the negotiating table at the Treaty of Versailles. Now, it wasn't because Ol' Woody wasn't a fan of the Kaiser, he actually thought the Kaiser had some keen ideas on governance. But bringing peace to Europe after the devastation of World War I wasn't Woody's main goal, bringing the world closer to one world government was the real goal, preferrably with him at the helm. Like all other dictators, the Woodster needed a scapegoat and Germany was the perfect fit, since Germany was about as popular as Chairman Obama's health care scheme at the time.



Naturally, this stupidity blew up in the American Dictator's face. The United States Senate had not yet degenerated into the Imperial Senate that we are burdened with today. They took one look at Wilson's League of Nations and promptly told him to shove it. Greedy Britain and France noted that Caesar Maximus Wilson was having trouble keeping his own government in check, so they greedily had John Maynard Keynes come up with a reparation scheme that would have Germany paying billions of dollars until 1987. Impotent and blinded by his nincompoopery, Woodrow The Horrible gave in to the Allies' demands. (Take from this what you will: Chairman Obama is currently using Keynsian economics as his model for his "Fundamental Transformation of America." God help us all.)



As one might expect, this didn't fly in Germany. The Volk had never accepted the idea that they were defeated in World War I. Amongst the angriest at this notion was an Austrian corporal named Schtickelgruber. Oh, you never heard of him ? Perhaps you would be more comfortable if I use his stage name: Adolf Hitler. He helped make a certain populist movement famous in Germany. (And no, Rachel Maddcow, it wasn't the Tea Party Movement.) That populist movement was called the National Socialist German Workers Party, or Nazis for short. After seizing power in a series of convoluted political moves, Adolf and his cronies took over Germany. Not satisfied with controlling Germany, they started a little skirmish known as World War II, despite the promise from Neville Chamberlain that he had secured "peace in our time".



Adolf and his pals Hirohito and Mussolini went down in defeat, but not until the world was plunged into the chaos King Woodrow I attempted to avoid by placing it into Progressivevik hands. The British Empire crumbled, giving birth to the rogue states of Iran and Iraq and the always unstable Pakistan. China turned communist, and the Nazi oppressors of eastern Europe were replaced by Soviet oppressors. This led to the uncomfortable situation known as the Cold War. Occaisonally, the Cold War became hot in places like Korea, Vietnam, and a backward hell hole known as Afghanistan. The United States used Korea and Vietnam as practice for the big one with the Soviet Union and the Soviets used Afghanistan to hone their genocidal skills in Afghanistan.



While paying back the Soviets for their interference in Korea and Vietnam, the CIA met a young Mujahadeen named Osama Bin Laden. They were impressed with the young Saudi's anti-Soviet attitude so they showed him all the tricks of the trade and helped arm a group you may or may not have heard of called the Taliban. In their zeal, the CIA forgot that Osama also hated the United States. That little miscalculation led to the Man Made Disaster known as 9/11. (Remember comrades, Big Mommy has declared that words like terrorist attack and Islamic Extremist are now unwords. Use them at the risk of being charged with a hate crime, or at very least, being called a Nazi bigot homophobe who is worse than a Holocaust denier because you think Global Warming is a scam.) 9/11 proved to the United States that ignoring your enemies is a terrible idea, so when a guy named Saddam Hussein refused to let weapons inspectors see his stash, George W. Bush, a Texan whose command of the English language was tenous at best, decided it was time knock Iraq down a peg or two.



How did all of this chaos begin ? Would Be Emperor Wilson The Clueless forgot "for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction." He tried to coerce the world into accepting his world view of tyrannical peace, but instead only succeeded in plunging it into a hundred years of warfare and genocide. Talk about opposite reaction!



One can only shudder at the thought of the unintended consequences of Chairman Obama's Raise The White Flag of Surrender nuclear weapon policies. After all, "for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction".



I just hope that the "opposite reaction" isn't an American city glowing in the dark or mass graves filled with victims from a chemical or biological attack on American soil.

Another Sign We Are Winning

It's pretty easy these days if you're a Conservative, to want to slash your wrists in a nice warm bath, ala Frank Pantangili in Godfather II.


After all, we've seen Chairman Obama's Big Mommy REGIME take over the health care, car manufacturers, student loans, and the banks. We have the constant threat of Card Check looming over our heads. We have traitors like Lindsey Grahamnesty and John McPain ready to sell us down the river with Cap and Traitor and amnesty. We have our Dear Leader trying to unilaterally disarm our country with his Defenseless on Demand treaty with the Russians. (The new DOD.) It's pretty easy to want to off yourself before the death panels do it for you.



Well, don't down that bottle of pills just yet. We are winning some of these battles against AMSOC. Naturally, the state controlled press won't tell you about them, but I will, regardless of whether or not Schmuck Schumer thinks I'm a journalist. I will tell you all about them in the face of the Fairness Doctrine or Net Neutrality. I'll even tell you about these victories while giving FCC Diversity Czar Mark Lloyd the social finger. Why, I'll even do it while mooning Cass Sunstein.



If we're kicking Progressivevik rectums anywhere, we're doing it in their house, the holiest of all holies, the public schools. That's right, the grouchy Conservative underground is taking back our schools from the socialist hands of the teacher unions, just like we took back our history and our textbooks in Texas. (For more on this, check out my column A Texas Sized Boot In The Rear at absolutely nobama.com in the blog section.) We're also giving the Overbearing Opposition nervous diarrhea here in sunny Florida. With HB 7189 and Senate Bill 6, we here in Florida are taking back our schools by ending tenure for lazy, entitled teachers and forcing them to actually do the job they're paid to do by enacting merit pay standards and providing mechanisms to can teachers who aren't up to snuff.



In other words, they'll have to perform, just like the rest of us do in the private sector.



Naturally, this doesn't sit well with the unions. After all, their motto is "I'll start representing school children when they start paying union dues." (Right, Albert Shanker ?) The Progressivevik "educators" immediately took to the streets of Tallahassee with misspelled signs and signs in Spanish. "The bill is harmful and scary" they moaned between bong hits. "It will destroy public education" they cried after an acid bump. Bizzy Jenkins, an AP art teacher at Cypress Bay High School, (which, oddly enough, is in Inner Party member Debbie Wasserman-Schultz's district.) said "I think it's just horrific that they could even think to do this. I could have a profound influence on a student, but if a few students do very poorly, I could lose my job." That's right folks, the teachers aren't at all worried about the fact that they turn out high school graduates that are only qualified to work the shake machine at McDonald's or march in San Francisco at some GreenPeace rally. That's never an issue. The only thing that's an issue that we have entitled, lazy teachers that want to be treated like selfless martyrs who deserve lifelong job security with pensions that would put the Post Office's to shame.



It may sound like I have an axe to grind. Well, I won't beat around the bush. I do. My thirteen years as a victim in Florida's public school system give me a right to be a critic. I can honestly say that not one of my teachers from Kindergarten to to my senior year in high school had any profound effect on me. Looking back, I don't know how they slept at night collecting pay checks they didn't even remotely earn. Sure, I learned all about how Heather Has Two Mommies and how to put a condom on a banana, but in college, I had to take remedial algebra classes because the skills of putting condoms on bananas and calling Columbus a genocidal homophobe were far more important than mathematics.



We, as the taxpayers footing the bill, deserve a hell of a lot more bang for the buck, especially since Chairman Obama's Big Mommy REGIME is taking more and more out of our pockets. We, as citizens, have every right to expect that our employees, the teachers, are paid professionals. We, as citizens, have a right to demand that our public school system turn out functioning adults. We're forced into paying for it, so why can't we have quality ?



(As a side note, Charlie Crist, our "Republican" governor and candidate for the Imperial Senate, is considering vetoing these important reforms. Now, I don't normally stump for candidates, but this is a pretty good reason to vote for Marco Rubio, isn't it ?)

The New Unword

Recently, Chrissy Matthews, another one of the dying MSNBC's "analysts", had a temper tantrum because Rush Limbaugh called Chairman Obama's administration a "regime". The Clown Prince of Journalism said this to Upchuck Todd:




"I've never seen language like this in the American press," and "referring to an elected representative government, elected in a totally fair, democratic, American election -- we will have another one in November, we'll have another one for president in a couple years -- fair, free, and wonderful democracy we have in this country…. We know that word, 'regime.' It was used by George Bush, 'regime change.' You go to war with regimes. Regimes are tyrannies. They're juntas. They're military coups. The use of the word 'regime' in American political parlance is unacceptable, and someone should tell the walrus [Limbaugh] to stop using it."

Nevermind the fact that Chrissy, Rachel Maddcow, and the Human Rat Keith Olbermann used the new unword "regime" on a daily basis during the Bush Error. I even hear Moron Dowd had the unword tattooed on her body in a place she doesn't like to talk about at trendy Progressivevik cocktail parties. However, this column isn't about their hypocrisy, nor is this column about defendiing Rush Limabugh, who doesn't need me to defend him. This column is about how blind, deaf, and down right "f-ing ret"--[Message from Thought Police: You're a slow learner, aren't you ?] the lamestream media has become. Let me ask you, Chrissy, what would you call our Dear Leader's reign ? An exercise in Jeffersonian Democracy ? My God, the man has the Brothers Castro cheering on his health care scam! In case the thrill running up your leg also affected your one celled brain, here's a few tidbits from the last year and change that proves the word "regime" is actually an understatement when describing Chairman Obama's governing style: --Herr ReichKanzler Obama signed into law a bill that could send people to jail for refusing to go along with the plan and buy approved health insurance. --Caesar Obama Maximus embarrassed the Supreme Court at his State of Confusion Address for standing up for Free Speech. He got his fellow Progressiveviks all fired up the way the Romans did when it was feeding time for the lions. --With Cap and Trade, His Majesty would like to decide which light bulbs will be approved for use in his kingdom. --There was a plot to have students write essays on how Il Duce Obama "inspires" them after an address to them during valuable class time that should have been dedicated to, Oh, what the hell, reading and writing. --The new Obamacareless fiat that was signed into law by Shogun Obama calls for 16,000 IRS health care inquisitors to roam the country side and punish those who commit the heresy of not buying health insurance or those who practice maho-tsukai magic. (I hadda keep up the Japanese theme of this joke. Big ol' block of government cheese for the reader who can tell me what a maho-tsukai is.) --El Presidente Obama has appointed the following individuals to UNELECTED czar positions or advisory positions: a propaganda specialist (Yosi Sargent), a eugenicist (John Holdren), Maoists (Ron Bloom, Anita Dunn, Van Jones, and Jim Wallis), and a socialist (Carol Browner). I can't for the life of me figure out what the hell Cass Sunstein is. Viva la Revolucion!



So, as you can see Crissy, the word "regime" is not unwarranted here, but it is a vast understatement of how much trouble we're in as a functioning Republic. I have my own word, and a word that's far classier than fascist dictatorship, which is so 1933. What we have here is the beginning of : Oligarchical Collectivism.



Boy, I can't wait to have Michelle Obama leading our morning exercises on the telescreens.

Preval in '12

Recently, Haitian President Rene Preval asked for the foreign food aid to stop.




That's right, in the midst of the one of the worst humanitarian disasters in world history, President Preval asked that food aid be stopped. Apparently, the man "doesn't care about black people" like George W. Hitler, right, Kanye ?



Well, no. President Preval is the only person involved with the Haitian disaster who's using his head for more than a hat rack. Mr. Preval realized, just as Franklin Delano Roosevelt did, that welfare and free goodies are a "narcotic". Mr.Preval, who's showing that he's one smart cookie, realized that the food vendors in his country were going broke. Why should anyone pay for food when it's free from some blue helmeted fascist ? All you have to do is show reverance for your UN occupiers and you get a big ol' bag of rice. Where is there any incentive to rebuild the country ? Where is the drive to succeed if everything is handed to you by some bureaucrat from a foreign country ? President Preval is probably one of the most inspirational men on this planet for making a statement like this. You want to talk about having Spauldings and testicular fortitude ? This guy has more than almost any member of the Imperial Senate, the Shack of Representatives, and certainly more than Chairman Obama, that's for damn sure.



You know, I wish Chairman Obama was more like President Preval. No, I'm not taking it back. The bravery shown by President Preval is what's needed to get our country going again. We should bottle up his drive and ambition and force feed it to Congress. This is rugged individualism at its finest. That "No thanks, I'll take care of it myself" attitude that President Preval is trying to show is what made America great, not beliefs like "no one should go broke because they got sick" or "no one should go broke because they decided to go to college" and other Obamgasms that are sending us to the Third World faster than you could say : "Man, I should have voted for Ron Paul and not listened to Oprah."



We, fellow citizens, are the only people who can right the ship. Catchy slogans and a whole bunch of Hopey Changey crap isn't going to do it. We have to roll up our sleeves, get a little dirt under the fingernails, and do it ourselves. Does it mean things will be uncomfortable and a little hairy ? Yup. Does it mean living like our grandparents did, reasonably and within our means ? Yup. Isn't our freedom and dignity worth it ? Damn straight it is. If Rene Preval, with his country turning into the First Layer of Hell, can say "We'll handle it ourselves" why can't we, the American people say the same ? Remember, we took down the Kaiser, Hitler, the Evil Empire of the Soviet Union, and Saddam Hussein. There isn't anything the American people can't do. We just need the courage again.



Or, Rene Preval on the ticket in '12.

Yenta Obama

My favorite word in Yiddish is yenta. A yenta is a busybody who complains about every little ache and pain and in general, spreads his or her misery to others. They often moan about how others cause their troubles but are unable to see how their actions cause their own headaches.

There have been many yentas in history, but none as powerful as our Yenta-In-Chief, Big Mommy himself, Chairman Obama.

Recently, our Dear Leader had an interview with Harry Smith, whoever the hell he is, in which he sobbed how the economy was the chief cause of the "vitriol" against him and between sniffles, Chairman Obama called the criticisms of Glenn Beck and Rush Limbaugh "troubling". Yes, the most powerful man on God's green and not to mention scientfically proven cooling earth took time out of his schedule as leader of the free world to say how a radio host and a guy who looks like a cartoon character hurt his feelings. Yes, the man whose unpopular decisions helped prolong this recession until God knows when thinks it's just mindless vitriol when criticism rears its head, since according to Oprah, he's the "One".

Oy Vey.

My first reaction to Chairman Obama's comments was extreme annoyance. Would it have killed him to mention me, too ? I've slaved away on this keyboard for almost two years and even used his name as the title of my column. I wanted a piece of the pie too, dammit! Besides, wasn't it our First Lady who said that some people would have to get a smaller slice of the pie so everyone could get a piece of that pie ? Or did she say "from each according to their abilities to each according to their needs" ? I don't know. All that crap is starting to sound the same, kind of like a broken communist record.

After the rage of my snub subsided, I pondered the the meaning of Yenta Obama's words and I came to a disturbing conclusion. He doesn't get it, He'll never get it, and damn, this will look cool in italics. Chairman Obama is even more oblivious than advertised. The man honestly thinks he's doing the right thing and recycled Marxist thought is what America really wanted when they chose him over Ol' Sour Puss in the '08 Popularity Contest. See, it didn't matter back then what he said. Our Dear Leader could have promised to liberate ethnic Germans in the Sudetenland for all anyone cared. All that mattered to anyone was the simple fact Obama was not Bush. The leftist media had succeeded in making Bush look like incompetent imperialist who couldn't lead ants to a picnic, so the crowd flocked to the opposite of him. Stories and rumblings about Obama's shady past were swept under the rug. since making history was far more important than doing the right thing. Now, the proles are having buyer's remorse. All those little socialist clues Obama dropped on the campaign trail were just examples of how how much he "cares". Now, almost a year and a half in, those socialist clues he dropped during the campaign are starting to freak people out. It's like the old saying goes: "It's all fun and games until someone gets hit in the wallet."

Is it vitriol to complain on the eve of the biggest tax hike in human history ? Is it vitriol when one complains that the Constitution is being ignored by the leadership of our country ? Is it vitriol to complain that government is creeping further and further into our lives without our consent ? Is it vitriol to question the government's motives when they take over the health care system, student loans, banks, and car manufacturers ? That isn't vitriol at all, your Yenta-ship. That's called patriotic duty. It is the duty of every American citizen to keep an eye on the government, because once freedom is gone, it's gone for good. Don't believe me ? See Cuba and Venezuela for further details.

Now, on to Yenta Obama's girlie-manish crying about Rush Limabugh and Glenn Beck Goldstein, Enemy of The State. I hate to break it to you, bubbie, but your lackeys and minions have said and done things that are far more "troubling" than anything two radio talk show hosts have said. Let's take a trip down memory lane, Presidente.

--Ron Bloom, your UNELECTED manufacturing czar, said all political power comes from the barrel of a gun and capitalism was nonsense.

--Kevin Jennings, your UNELECTED school safety czar, spoke lovingly about Harry Hay, a communist pedophile and poster-thing for NAMBLA.

--Anita Dunn, your former White House Communications director said Chairman Mao was one of her favorite political philosophers, right along with Mother Teresa.

--John Holdren, your UNELECTED science czar, wrote that dumping sterilants into drinking water was a swell idea along with forced abortions.

--Nancy Pelosi, your boss and plastic surgery disaster, called Americans who dared to voice their opposition to your schemes and scams were "astroturf"

--Harry "I Surrender" Reid,  the soon to be unperson Imperial Senate Majority leader, said Americans visiting THEIR Capitol on vacation smelled.

--Phil Hare, a Congressman from YOUR party and YOUR home state said he doesn't care what the Constitution says and doesn't know the difference between the Constitution and the Declaration.

--John Dingellberry, the oldest Progressivevik in captivity, said YOUR health care plot was useful in "controlling the people".

--Jeremiah Wright, your old religious mentor, said in a sermon "God Damn America." (And, let's not forget, "The white man's greed creates a world in need". I guess we shouldn't forget how "them Jews" won't let you see him anymore, either.)

--I could go on and on with the dearly departed Van Jones, but it's too easy, sort of like shooting fish in a barrel, isn't it ?

Oy Vey, indeed.

Why The Seventeenth Amendment Must Die

Imagine, fellow Right Wing Extremists, an America where the engine of Big Government, the hated Seventeenth Amendment is now dead, choked to death by its eco-friendly fuel. You would have this following conversation taking place in every Senator's office during the whole Obamacareless debacle.






--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Governor: Hello, Senator Reasonable ? How are you ?



Senator: Not bad, Governor. What's on your mind ?



Governor: Well, it's about this whole health care thing. You know, our state can't afford it.



Senator: Way ahead of you, boss. This thing doesn't have a snowball's chance in hell. The last whip count had it 75-25, good guys. How's Marissa and the kids ?..........



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------





Since the evil Seventeenth Amendment, the direct election of Imperial Senators for those of you who were victims of our public school system, is still alive, we actually had this:





--------------------------------------------------------------------------------





Governor: Hello, Imperial Senator Himmler ?



Senator (annoyed): What do you want now ?



Governor: Well, it's about this health care thing, our state can't afford it.



Senator: Go f--- yourself.



Governor: No, really, think about it. We can't support a goldfish, let alone--



Senator: Go f--- yourself. Quit crying or I'll give you something to cry about, you little b----. (Slams down phone.)



Governor: (to his aide) I think you gave me the wrong number. I think that was Rahm Emmanuel's phone number.





--------------------------------------------------------------------------------





The moral of the above story is this: until the Seventeenth Amendment is dead and buried, and until the states have an actual voice in the malfunctioning federal government, all the happy-happy-joy-joy Tea Parties, bloggers with really cool handles, radio talkfests, and the one man industry known as Glenn Beck aren't going to amount to a hill of beans in the task of fighting off Big Mommy and her fascist hugs. See, the Progressivevik movement's very existence is due to the fact that the states don't have any say in what is done to them by the federal government. Every time Big Mommy gets into one of her moods, all the states can say is: "Thank you for the screwing. Can we have another ?" The reason for this is the fact that Imperial Senators don't answer to the states, they answer to the DNC and the RNC who control the purse strings of their reelection campaigns. (And, not to mention, their bondage club budgets.) There will be some who claim that that Imperial Senators answer to their constituents, but that's a load of room temperature crap on a stick. If that were the case, Mary Landfill wouldn't have pretended her phones weren't working, and maybe I would not have recieved robo-emails from Bill Nelson thanking me for my support every time I sent him a nastygram informing him that he lost my vote if he went along with the whole Obamacareless charade. To quote our Fuhrer Herr Beck: "I'm just saying."



Now, don't get me wrong, I'm a big believer in the Tea Party movement, but I'm afraid they can't see the forest through the trees. In all honesty, it doesn't matter who they send to the District of Communism if the system is still broken when they get there. Sure, there will be the occaisonal Browngasm that will make the crowd ooh and ahh but the problem will still be there. Therefore, I have a little home work assignment for my fellow Extremists: Think about getting the ball rolling about killing the Seventeenth Amendment. If you really are serious about killing the coming fascism in utero, this is the best way start.



I can assure you that it would be a late term abortion we could all support.