Sunday, March 27, 2011

From Doves To Hawks ?

What do,,, and all have in common ?

Well, they're all part of Pharoah $oros' empire....They're all followed by the 2+2=5 crowd....They all hate America.....Oh yeah, NOT ONE OF THEM HAS COME OUT AGAINST CHAIRMAN OBAMA'S LIBYAN ADVENTURE!

If you'll kindly take a stroll with me down Memory Hole Lane, you'll recall that all of the above websites and parent organizations were virulently against the wars in Afganistan and Iraq. They often compared then President Bush to Adolf Hitler, chanted nonsense like "Not in my name!", held peace rallies, blah, blah, blah, yadda, yadda, yadda. It was as if they were trying to recreate the Great Disruption of the 1960's all over again. I have to give them credit, they were able to sour the American attitude against both wars, despite the fact that both wars were vital to national secuirty and were completely necessary.

Out of that maelstrom of liberal stupidity rose a star. That star was Barack Hussein Obama. The previously unknown state senator from Mentally Illinois quickly rose from obscurity to victory in the '08 Popularity Contest which saw him defeat the retread Senator from Arizona, John McPain. During his mad rush to power, Obama made it perfectly clear he was not a fan of either war, as evidenced by this quote:


"Operations in Iraq and Afghanistan and the war on terrorism have reduced the pace of military transformation and have revealed our lack of preparation for defensive and stability operations. This Administration has overextended our military."


The arrogant and lazy lamestream media ate it up, as did the Progressivevik movement. They made it sound like Jesus had returned and was elected President. As Evan Thomas of Newspeak (No, not a typo.) famously said, after Chairman Obama's speech in Cairo:


"I mean in a way Obama’s standing above the country, above – above the world, he’s sort of God."


One would think that the lamestream media and Obama's fanatical followers would be bitter and disillusioned after Obama decided to become the hitman of the European Union and the United Nazis (UN). Not at all, True Believer. Some are looking at Obama's Libyan Adventure as a great moment in Liberal History. As Moron Dowd wrote in the New York Slimes:


"There is something positively mythological about a group of strong women swooping down to shake the president out of his delicate sensibilities and show him the way to war. And there is something positively predictable about guys in the White House pushing back against that story line for fear it makes the president look henpecked."


The rank and file Progressiveviks aren't all torn up about Chairman Obama's new found war mongering ways, either. Check out these user posts on


"This isn't "blood for oil." America has little interest in Libya's resources. There is a dictator who is actually using tactical nukes on citizens. There is a WAVE of spontaneous democratic change sweeping the Middle East right now. It is not the US, but the United Nations, sharing responsibility to aid the democratic rebels in Libya, jsut as it is the United Nation's responsibility to allocate various countries' resources to aiding in the rescue of Japan. The UN, with the US and this President are acting together to make the world a better place, and if you can't see that, you really need to remove Beck's duct tape from your eyes and his fingers from your ears."

[I would be remiss in my duties if I didn't point out that Libya has no tactical nuclear weapons.]

"Someone 'gets' it? Your Cato Institute frame of 'Blood for Oil' makes ZERO sense here to people who have taken the time to even remotely understand what the United Nations is doing and why we're keeping up our end of the bargain as a leading member and remaining world superpower. There is no oil for the US from Libya. There is a spontaneous Democratic revolution sweeping the entire Middle East, and the UN, with our assistance, is aiding the rebels against a dictator who is using tactical nukes against his own people to suppress democratic reform. Shame on you for pushing your Koch Brothers frame of this president, the UN, and our harmonic cooperation with the world. The days of preemptive wars and telling the world what will be done for our own defense and energy industry profit is OVER. You WILL NOT be able to compare this President or his policies to those of Bush, except as a complete yin/yang contrast exercise."


In the past, it would have been easy to just say that the Progressiveviks were just playing the partisan game and were simply standing with the President they worked so hard to get elected. However, the left has become more dangerous than ever, (See Van Jones and Code Pinko's Middle East tour for further details.) and the stakes are so high (We now are fighting three wars on the edge of a total economic break down.) that we can't let our guard down for a second.

My educated guess is this: The Collectivist Left sees Chairman Obama's Libyan Adventure as the redistribution of wealth. The Libyan rebels have nothing, so it's only fair that the greedy, capitalist American tax payer foot the bill for their revolution. This, in the warped mind of a liberal, is a justified use of the United States military. However, when the United States defended itself as it did in the case of the war in Afghanistan, or acted in its best interests as it did with Iraq, all of a sudden it's a problem, because to the left, the United States was defending capitalism by defending itself. I know how bat-poop crazy this sounds, but I don't have any other answer to the question of why the left went from pantywaist doves to hawks in a matter of days.

Congress needs to get off of their ample duffs and put an end to this Libyan Adventure. America's national security nor best interests are being threatened by the chaos in Libya. (To be perfectly blunt and honest, since the rebels have ties to the Muslim Brotherhood and quite possibly al-Qaeda, let them and Qadaffi Duck kill each other. Who cares ?) Not one solidier, sailor, airman, or Marine should have to give his life so Libyans can establish an Islamonazi theocracy. Not one thin dime that a tax payer slaved for should pay for this crap. Speaker Boehner, you've been a very big disappointment so far. Time to make amends. Time to pull the plug on Chairman Obama's Libyan Adventure.

God help us all.

Friday, March 25, 2011

Just How Dangerous Is Code Pinko ?

Just how dangerous is Code Pinko ?  Read the snippets below:


"I have not been standing by. I personally was arrested in the Libyan embassy for taking down Gadhafi's picture. I've been with the people of Libya."---Medea Benjamin, Code Pinko co founder on the O'Reilly Factor, March 23, 2011



After several cancelled flights, I am finally on my way to Egypt to join my CODEPINK colleagues who are already there. We were supposed to be leading a delegation to Gaza right now, traveling through the Sinai to get to Gaza's southern border. The Rafa crossing into Gaza has been closed, our delegation is unable to leave Cairo, and we have been caught up in the breath-taking people's movement that is sweeping Egypt. CODEPINK’s Tighe Barry has been out on the streets of Cairo all week long. You can hear a compelling report from him here.

When CODEPINK was in Cairo for the Gaza Freedom March last year, we led and participated in small, peaceful protests that were set upon by hundreds of riot police at the behest of repressive Mubarak regime.

But now there has been a seismic shift. There are not 50 people rallying in Cairo, but hundreds of thousands protesting across the nation. Dozens have been killed; hundreds have been wounded.

But the Egyptian people will not be turned back. They feel their power and are determined to seize the moment.

The US has given Egypt $68 billion since 1948, and since 1979, Egypt has been the second-biggest recipient of US aid after Israel. Our government currently gives $1.3 billion a year of our tax dollars in military aid to the Mubarak regime.

Join us in telling President Obama, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and the U.S. Congress to stop funding the Mubarak regime now, to call on Mubarak to resign, and to expressly say that our government stands with the Egyptian people. After all, in his recent State of the Union Address, President Obama declared: “The United States stands with the people of Tunisia.” Shouldn’t we also stand with the Egyptians?

Sign here to stand in solidarity with people who are giving their government, our government and the world a lesson in democracy.

Mubarak is refusing to leave. But our government can—and must—break its ties to this dictator. As courageous Egyptian citizens are being assaulted with U.S. tear gas and other Made-in-the-USA weapons, we must say: Enough.

In solidarity,

Medea Benjamin"


"Yemen, January 28: The protesters who filled the streets of Sana, the Yemeni capital, on Thursday demanding the resignation of the country’s authoritarian leader claimed inspiration from similar large antigovernment protests that have rattled Egypt and toppled the government in Tunisia this month.

But among the details distinguishing these marchers — including a higher degree of organization and, at least for now, no major clashes — was the preponderance of pink. Headbands, sashes, banners of cloth or paper, even the ink of the blaring slogans were a delicate pastel pink.

The color — commonly associated in the United States with breast cancer awareness and princess outfits — was both a unifying symbol and an indication of the level of planning underlying the protests."

[In fairness, the actual Code Pinko organization was not mentioned in the article, but why the color pink, hmmmmm?]


"We are outraged, stunned and broken-hearted that the Israeli Navy has not only intercepted 6 ships that were carrying humanitarian aid to the 1.5 million people in Gaza who are living under an Israeli-imposed siege, but has actually killed and wounded dozens of these brave humanitarian activists. While Israel has refused to release precise details, news reports are saying that at least nine people were killed, many more wounded, and that remaining 700 passengers have been sent to Israel for arrest and/or deportation. The storming of civilian ships in international waters by Israeli commandos is a terrorist act that is a blatant violation of international law.

This must be a turning point for U.S. policy toward Israel. The reaction of the Obama Administration to Israel's attack on the humanitarian aid flotilla, which included U.S. citizens, has been totally unacceptable. A White House spokesperson stated that President Obama "deeply regrets the loss of life and injuries sustained." We need to hear from our President and our Congress a STRONG CONDEMNATION of this abominable attack, and it must be accompanied by action: an immediate cut off of all aid to Israel and sustained pressure on Israel to lift the siege of Gaza.

The U.S. government has been complicit in arming Israel and enabling its human rights abuses, including the ongoing siege of Gaza that has kept 1.5. million people living in the world’s largest open-air prison. In July 2008, the United States signed a contract worth $1.9 billion to transfer the latest-generation of naval combat vessels to Israel at U.S. taxpayer expense. Currently, Congress is in the process of appropriating a record $3.2 billion in military aid to Israel this budget year. This aid must be stopped.

Israel has imposed a crippling blockade on Gaza since 2007, and then the brutal Israeli invasion of Gaza in December 2009 left over 1,400 Palestinians dead. CODEPINK has been sending delegations of humanitarian aid to Gaza via Egypt and pressuring the U.S. government to call on Israel to lift the siege. In light of this present massacre of humanitarian workers, we vow to redouble our efforts to lift the inhumane siege of Gaza and change U.S. policy to support the rights of all people in the region."


"The group behind the Gaza flotilla that engaged in deadly clashes with Israeli commandos today counts among its top supporters the friends and associates of President Barack Obama, namely the founders of the Weather Underground terrorist organization, William Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn, as well as Jodie Evans, the leader of the radical activist organization Code Pink.

Earlier today, Israeli navy commandos raided the six-ship flotilla, encountering heavy resistance and live fire from the activists. Several activists were killed and dozens of others were reportedly injured, as were several of the Israeli commandos.

The flotilla was organized by the Free Gaza Movement, a coalition of leftist human rights activists and pro-Palestinian groups engaged in attempts to break a blockade imposed by Israel on the Hamas-controlled Gaza Strip.

Ayers, Dohrn and Evans' Code Pink have led several recent Free Gaza Movement initiatives, including attempted marches into the Gaza Strip. Dorhn was in the Middle East just last month on behalf of the movement."


I'm not going to beat around the bush. The psychotics at Code Pinko are leftist terrorists that are far more dangerous than Carlos the Jackal and Che Guevara combined. Sure, Guevara had his run in Cuba and Carlos the Jackal had his 15 minutes of fame with his attack on OPEC, but Code Pinko has helped bring the world to the brink of World War III, something Guevera and Ramirez failed to do. Obviously, they're not solely responsible for the Middle East going from crazy to bat-poop crazy, but there are just too many coincidences, just too many pink finger prints to ignore.

Congressman King, Congressman wanted investigations, right ? Here's a great place to start.

God help us all.

Wednesday, March 23, 2011

Liberals: Useless Idiots

Check out some of the conversations I had on the George $oros funded Nothing was edited and the grammatical, capitalization, and spelling errors by the 2+2=5'ers were left in for full effect.


[A conversation about what Enumerated Power grants Congress the authority to fund NPR, AKA Nazi Propaganda Radio, that somehow became a conversation about the "horrors of capitalism".]

Me: I'd like to know what Enumerated Power grants the "government" the authority to fund Nazi Propaganda Radio (NPR).


Drone: The same power that grants the government to continue handing out subsidies to Big Oil. The same power that allows the government to grant free license to right wing rant radio stations and pseudo Christian broadcasters devoted to funding their luxury lifestyles.

Me: Answer the question: What Enumerated Power grants Congress the power to fund Nazi Propaganda Radio ?

Ignorant Drone: He did. Read it again. Read it until you comprehend it.

Me: He did ? Where ? Who's on first...who's on second...who's redistributing wealth ?

Drone: I am unfamiliar with the organization you reference.What enumerated powers grants Congress the right to give subsidies to a private corporation ?

Me: looks like someone doesn't like Free Speech or the free market. In 2008, Exxon paid 318 million dollars per day in taxes.

[I should have said "By the way, Exxon paid 318 million dollars per day in 2008, but no one's perfect, and when I say unedited, I mean unedited, even if I drop the ball.]

Drone: Apart from being wrong, what does your comment about taxes have to do with anything? Subsidies are subsidies. In fact, the more taxes Big Oil pays, the more profit they made. The more profit they made, the less they should qualify for subsidies. Free speech would be everyone having an equal right to grab the microphone and broadcast using the PUBLIC airwaves. That is not the case, therefore radio does not fully qualify under free speech.

Me: You mentioned big oil, remember ?

Toe Jam: $318m x 365 = $116,070,000,000. No.

Me: "According to the company's income statement, the amount of taxes it paid in 2008 was 2.5 times as much as its net profit. The $45.2 billion profit figure makes a snappy headline, but the $116.2 billion in taxes that it paid is relegated to a footnote—if that. Exxon's tax bill breaks down like this: income taxes, $36.5 billion; sales-based taxes, $34.5 billion; "all other" taxes, $45.2 billion. Although the company doesn't mention royalty payments in its income statement, those payments are likely contained within the sales and "all other" categories.

In 2008, Exxon's tax bill averaged about $318 million per day. "

US News News and World Report--

Google Big oil taxes 2008. This site won't let you put a link on it. [Hmmmmm....I wonder why that's the link:]

[See the full conversation before it goes poof:]


[A personal favorite: Nazis were actually socialists.]

Me: Here's a newsflash for you: Nazi= National SOCIALIST German Workers Party. Mussolini began as a socialist.

Nazism and fascism have nothing to do with each other, but both are creations of the political left, just like Communism.

Vomit-Chunk: ...History Lesson:

Reason for Socialist in the title. The Nazi party began as a very very weak fringe party of a couple of guys who wanted to work on post-WWI legislation on taxation in Germany. Their plan was to in essence create an independent. See why they called themselves national socialist was to attract both nationalists AND socialists or to simply get people who were undecided. It was a gimmick. It was so people when they registered saw it they thought hmm I'm a nationalist but I like socialists or...they are also socialists...and other variants...

then Hitler ran with it and changed it...

Plus dude...NAZISM IS NOT LEFT NOR FASCISM...ask all the communists and socialists they killed in Germany...or for that matter Spain NAZI is an oxymoron.

Nazism/Fascism in theory has more in common with objectivism actually so...yeah...its on the right. Sorry, history does not support you.

Me: Or we could go with the truth: the Nazis were socialists.

"The NSDAP [The Nazis] and the DSP [The German Socialist Party] had arisen with the SAME ULTIMATE AIMS [emphasis mine], yet absolutely independent of each other. The main fighter for the DSP, as I have said, was Julius Streicher. At first he, too, had a holy conviction of the mission and the future of his movement. But as soon he could recognize the greater power and superior growth of the NSDAP clearly and without doubt, he ceased his activity for the DSP and the Working Federation, and called on his adherents to join the NSDAP..." ---Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf

Poop-Nugget: North Korea is officially called the Democratic People's Republic of Korea. So because it has democratic it's a democracy, right?

No. You're stupid. A name does not have to equal the parts. [Default Lib Argument Alert!]

Also, the fact that you would actually try to say the Nazi party was a socialist organization (especially after its gaining power) shows that you have absolutely no understanding of socialism or fascism.

North Korea is officially called the Democratic People's Republic of Korea. So because it has democratic it's a democracy, right?

Me: How about this little gem, the Nazi Party Platform from 1920, which was used as evidence in the Nuremberg Trial:

"We demand that the state be charged first with providing the opportunity for a livelyhood and a way of life for the citizens."

Funny how that doesn't sound like "Right Wing Rhetoric", huh ?

Me: "No. You're stupid." Oh really ?

"We must put an end to both economic freeloading and economic exploitation in America. There must be no place for parasites who draw their sustenance from society without giving anything in return. Those who thrive on usury, speculation, money-manipulation, and monopoly form a special class today whose primary interest is the maintenance of the system which allows their form of parasitism to flourish in the first place. We must have an economy based on the long-term interests of the man who works for a living, not the chronic loafer or the man who lives by renting out his capital."

Sounds like some pretty left wing stuff. Guess where I got that from ?

The American Nazi Party's website. [ ]

Me: To finally destroy your argument:

When the Nazis took Jewish businesses and handed them to Aryans, was that not a redistribution of wealth ?


To quote Calvin Coolidge: "You lose."

[See it here before it goes poof:]


[Because this is too damn funny to be legal]

Goon Bag (Referring to another Conservative.) :

Unions are not what got us into this mess. The "Livinginaworldfullofidiots" did. Unions only make up 7% of the work force. Neoliberal policies took care of that. The US motto is now:$kill$kill$kill$kill$kill$kill$kill$kill$kill$kill. Why bother debating? You and you ilk already got your way and now we have endless wars, a declining middle class, rising poverty, and a high infant death rate. This is what you are leaving to your kids: a non-thinking, non-caring, greedy "machine" with no conscience in charge of the government, the media, and the population. You don't even have to waste your time going onto a MoveOn website. You can just sit and do whatever it is you do and feel good about yourself because you are clearly winning the battle. (You are not winning the argument for a sane, just and peaceful world, however, which is what most sane people want.)You are picking at the scab of a wounded civilian. I have no more time for you, LIWFI. A marine from my town had both his legs blown off in Afghanistan and I'm helping with the fundraiser. You go on and spew your venom. I'll be busy caring for my fellow man.

Me: "I'll be busy caring for my fellow man."

By demanding someone else pays for it.

"A marine from my town had both his legs blown off in Afghanistan and I'm helping with the fundraiser. "

I find that very hard to believe. Call me crazy.

[See it here before it goes poof:]


God help us all.

Tuesday, March 22, 2011

Call Me Crazy And Off My Meds....

....but I just can't trust Chairman Obama's motives for his UNCONSTITUTIONAL attack on Libya.

Before we continue, Let me be, as our Kenyan President likes to say, "perfectly clear": Moammar Qadaffi is a lump of excrement. He has been a state sponsor of terror who has taken American lives. (The 1986 disco bombing and the Lockerbie bombing in 1988.) If anyone deserves to die, it's this piece of filth. When Qadaffi Duck is out of power, the world will breathe a small sigh of relief.

However, this article is not about Qadaffi. This article is about another Islamic dictator, Barack Hussein Obama.

Chairman Obama has given us no reason whatsoever not to doubt his motives or trust his judgement in this matter. After all (in no particular order) :

•Didn't Obama's Department of Injustice sue the state of Arizona for having the gall to defend itself against the Mexican Trickle Invasion and refuse to send troops to the southern border, yet he rushed to send troops to Haiti and Libya ?

•Didn't Chairman Obama turn his back on the only genuine democracy movement in the Middle East, Iran's Green Revolution ? Didn't he say he didn't want to be seen as "meddling" ?

•Didn't Chairman Obama sit on his hands while General Stanley McChrystal damn near begged for additional troops in Afghanistan, yet he rushed troops to Haiti and Libya ?

•Didn't Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton, hand 900 million dollars to Hamas ?

•Didn't Chairman Obama call Egypt's new military dictatorship a "democracy" ?

•Didn't Chairman Obama ask the UN's permission instead of Congress' permission to attack Libya ?

•Aren't many of these so-called Libyan "freedom fighters" al-Qaeda operatives ? Even the HuffingtonandPuffington Post admits it.

Given our Dear Leader's 2+2=5 logic, is it really a stretch to question Chairman Obama's motives in this matter ?

God help us all.

Friday, March 18, 2011

Obamacareless: Nothing More Than A Socialist Power Grab

Once in a while, the lazy and arrogant lamestream media gives us useful information, usually by accident. Today was one of those days. Let's take a look at these interesting morsels from the Associated Depressed:


"U.S. life expectancy has hit another all-time high, rising above 78 years. The estimate of 78 years and 2 months is for a baby born in 2009, and comes from a preliminary report released Wednesday by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

About 2.4 million people died in the United States in 2009 — roughly 36,000 fewer deaths than the year before."


"Death rates declined slightly for 10 of the 15 leading causes of death, including heart disease, cancer, stroke, accidents, Alzheimer's disease, homicide and influenza and pneumonia."


Well, gee, that's odd. Didn't the 2+2=5 Democrat party spend all of 2009 telling us how terrible health care was ? Let's take a stroll down Memory Hole Lane and look at some of the propaganda that the Dims spewed:


"Well, the current health care system, the insurance companies, and those who support them are doing just that. ... Those fighting health care reform – not those debating its shape or its nuance – people who demand the status quo, they are killing 45,000 Americans a year."

---Keith Olbermann attacking talk show host Neil Boortz and anyone else who opposed Obamacareless. In this bout of mental illness, Olbermann claims to cite some study from Haw-Vard that stated 45,000 people die every year in the US because they lack health insurance. The funny thing is the study didn't come from the Pinkies Up Crowd at Haw-Vard. It came from a group called the Physicians for a National Health Program (PNHP), a left wing group dedicated to inflicting single payer health care on the United States.

"If you get sick, America, the Republican health care plan is this: Die quickly." ---FORMER Congressman Alan Grayson (C-FL) on the floor of the House of Representatives.


The bottom line is this: The Democrat Party is full of crap. Obamacareless in nothing more than a socialist power grab.

Yes, I know, I'm not being civil, I'm a partisan hack, blah, blah, blah, I hate the poor, yadda, yadda, yadda. But am I wrong ? According to the Associated Depressed, (Which is often like the Greek Chorus in the Democrat Party's Greek Tragedies, so this isn't exactly "Right Wing propaganda".) we're living longer, healthier lives. Now call me crazy and off my meds, but if the health care situation was as bad as the Commie Chicken Littles on the left would have you believe, wouldn't we be living shorter lives ? Wouldn't the deaths from heart disease, cancer, strokes, and the flu be on the rise and not on the decline ? Granted, it took me two tries and a whole lot of bribes to pass Statistics in college, but I know a mathematical trend when I see a see a mathematical trend.

Obamacareless is NOT about improving health care, it's about redistributing it. As the Wall Street Journal's Betsy McCaughey wrote in 2009:


"The Congressional majority wants to pay for its $1 trillion to $1.6 trillion health bills with new taxes and a $500 billion cut to Medicare. This cut will come just as baby boomers turn 65 and increase Medicare enrollment by 30%. Less money and more patients will necessitate rationing. The Congressional Budget Office estimates that only 1% of Medicare cuts will come from eliminating fraud, waste and abuse.

The assault against seniors began with the stimulus package in February. Slipped into the bill was substantial funding for comparative effectiveness research, which is generally code for limiting care based on the patient’s age. Economists are familiar with the formula, where the cost of a treatment is divided by the number of years (called QALYs, or quality-adjusted life years) that the patient is likely to benefit. In Britain, the formula leads to denying treatments for older patients who have fewer years to benefit from care than younger patients."


In other words, Sarah Palin is right. The Dims want death panels that will determine who will live and who will die. (Yes, Medicare needs to be reformed, if not done away with altogether. However, it has to be done in a responsible manner that doesn't include some government bureaucrat like Donald Berwick pretending to be Josef Mengele.) If that isn't bad enough, Chairman Obama, Everyone's Least Favorite Kenyan Socialist, even openly admits that his hated health care plan is nothing more than a socialist wealth redistribution scam. Take it away, Alinskyite Prime:


"No one in America should go broke because they get sick." ---Barack Hussein Obama


Or in other words....

"From each according to his ability to each according to his need"---Karl Marx (With this addendum from the US Democrat Party: "Except for the old and sick. They can drop dead for all we care.")

God help us all.

Thursday, March 17, 2011

I Don't See It From My House

From today's White House press briefing....


Q Given that Secretary Chu described the situation in Japan as a partial meltdown today and that there are conflicting reports, says Secretary Chu, that several reactors are now at risk, and given the updated advisories about the evacuations that you’ve outlined here, is there thought being given here to postponing the Latin America trip?

[INNER PARTY MEMBER JAY] CARNEY [Press Secretary]: We still very much plan to take the trip. I just want to emphasize with all --

Q When?

MR. CARNEY: We are leaving on schedule on Friday. It bears repeating that this is a crisis -- there is no question about it. And it is a crisis in Japan. It is not a crisis in the United States. We are very concerned about our allies and friends, the Japanese. We are doing everything we can to help and assist them. We are very concerned about the safety and security of American citizens in Japan, and we are doing everything we can to ensure their safety. But it is -- we have no plans to change the trip.


And we thought we would miss Robert Fibbs. Shame on us.

Whether or not everyone's least favorite Kenyan Socialist likes it or not, the disaster in Japan IS America's problem. The tragedy in Japan is not just a Japanese problem or an American problem, it's a world wide problem that can cause chaos throughout the world's economies. In fact, the National Inflation Association released the following warning:


The earthquake, tsunami, and nuclear disaster that hit Japan this past week and the destruction that it caused is nothing compared to the tsunami of inflation that will soon hit the U.S. as a result of this crisis. A tsunami of inflation in the U.S. will mean a complete collapse of our monetary system, which could lead to millions of deaths due to a lack of food and heat. 44 million Americans are now dependent on food stamps, but when the U.S. dollar becomes worthless as a result of hyperinflation, the government will no longer have the power to support these Americans and many of them will simply starve to death.

Japan's citizens were smart enough to save up $885.9 billion in U.S. treasuries to spend in a situation like it finds itself in today. The U.S. has no such savings and is the world's largest debtor nation. Our ability to survive depends on our ability to print money that has purchasing power. The only reason the U.S. dollar still has purchasing power is the dollar's status as the world's reserve currency."


In other words, this could be make 2008-10 look like an economic boom period. And yet, according to the White House, this is just Japan's problem ? What drugs does this White House do ?

Japan, by all accounts, has the third largest economy in the world. If it were to crash, what kind of shockwaves would it create in an already shaky world economy that is also dealing with a Middle East that has gone from crazy to bat-poop crazy ? What kind of shockwave would it create in a world that's keeping tired, socialist Europe alive on lifesupport ? If this situation gets any worse....well, you should seriously consider hoarding food, gold, and ammo. No, I'm not kidding.

The world is in Book of Revelation like chaos. Now is not the time to shrug your shoulders and say "I don't see it from my house". Now is not the time to go on ESPN to give Final Four picks. Now is not the time to go golfing. Now is not the time for a weekend in Rio. Yes, Chairman Obama, it's time to roll up your sleeves and do some work. I know that bums you out, but thems the breaks.

God help us all.

Monday, March 14, 2011

The Radical Left And Radical Islam: Comrades To The End

If Congressman Peter King (R-NY) really wants answers about radical Islam, he should tell the 2+2=5 radical left to put down their bongs and appear before his committee. The radical left and radical Islam have been comrades for decades and in my not-so-humble opinion, it's time to shed a little light on the subject.

The torrid love affair began during World War II when Adolf Hitler met the Grand Mufti of Jerusalem, Hajj Amin al-Husseini, in 1941. (Yes, the Nazis werre leftists. For those of you who were educationally abused by our public school system, Nazi is short for National SOCIALIST German Workers Party.) The two took an immediate liking to each other. They both loved moon-lit walks on the beach. They both loved risotto. Most importantly, they both wanted to exterminate the Jews. al-Husseini proved to be a valuable ally to the Reich, helping to recruit thjousands of Muslims for the Waffen-SS (He didn't really have to twist any arms. The SS Handschar unit had over 20,000 Muslim troops.) and in return, all the Fuhrer had to do was put the Holocaust into overdrive, which he was more than happy to do.

When Nazi Germany went belly up in 1945, the alliance between the nutjobs on the radical left and radical Islam simmered down until a young man form Venezuela appeared on the world stage. His birth name was Illich Ramirez Sanchez, but you probably know him as Carlos The Jackal. In his heyday, Carlos The Jackal was the Osama bin Laden of the 1970's. Sanchez was a Communist revolutionary who made a name for himself comitting acts of terror for the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine. Sanchez, under the supervision of PFLP mastermind Waddie Haddad, was instrumental in forging an alliance between the European far-left and radical Islam. Sanchez was able to unite the German Red Army Faction and the Japanese Red Army to the PFLP, and the unholy trio terrorized Europe with help from Syria, Iraq, Libya, and the Soviets until Ronald Reagan won the Cold War and the USSR crumbled into dust, much like Keith Olbermann's career. (Carlos The Jackal was captured in Sudan in 1994 by US and French intelligence. Luckily for us, Hillary's Less Than Faithful Husband, President Caligula, didn't screw up Carlos The Jackal's capture the way he screwed up the attempted assassination of Osama bin Laden. Another rant for another time.)

The American left's alliance with radical Islam has been far different than that of their Euro-trash counterparts. The American far left was different from the European far left. While both groups were a collection of misfits that were prone to violence, the American left was much less sucessful. John Q. Public didn't see groups like the Black Panthers or the Weather Underground as heroes, unlike the way Carlos The Jackal was worshiped in some parts of Europe. The average American saw the fringe left for what they were: commie thugs and traitors. By the time Tricky Dicky resigned, America began to realize that the Counter Culture of the 1960's was a terrible idea and the American left's prestige cratered, much like a book penned by Chris "I'll Have Another Drink" Matthews. Thus, America failed to notice when the radical left started cozy themselves up to radical Islam, like the way future Secretary of State Hillary Clinton did with Yasser Arafat, the PLO's head thug. In fact, in his must read American Evita, Christopher Anderson wrote:


"In late July of 1973, however, Hillary's mind was on practicing law. She and Bill made another trip to Arkansas to take the bar exam- and passed on the first try. (Hillary would not be so fortunate in Washington DC, where she had taken the exam twice before passing.) It was during this trip to his home state that Bill took Hillary to meet a politically well-connected friend. When they drove up to the house, Bill and Hillary noticed that a menorah- the seven branched Hebrew candelabrum (not be confused with the more common and subtler mezuzah)- had been affixed on the front door.

'My daddy was half Jewish,' explained Bill's friend. 'One day when he came to visit, my daddy placed the menorah on my door because he wanted me to be proud that we were part Jewish. And I wasn't about to about to say no to my daddy."

To his astonishment, as soon as Hillary saw the menorah, she refused to get out of the car. 'Bill walked up to me and said she was hot and tired, but later he explained the real reason.' According to the friend and another eyewitness, Bill said, 'I'm sorry, but Hillary's really tight with the PLO in New York. They're friends of hers, and she doesn't feel right about the menorah.'

'Do you mean to tell me,' Bill's friend shot back, 'that she is going to be part of Yasser Arafat and all of those people ?'

Bill shrugged. 'Hillary really backs the PLO and doesn't like what Israel is up to,' he said, looking sheepish. 'Anyway she just thinks having a menorah on your front door...she just doesn't like it, that's all.' "


The American far left didn't see the PLO or PFLP the way most rational people saw them, as the heirs to the Nazis. No, they saw the so-called "struggle" of the Palestinians as another excuse to hate America and its "imperialism". By this time, Gerald Ford bored America into submission and the Error of Jimmy Carter, the antisemitic peanut farmer was born. The incompetent Carter wasn't a fan of Israel's right to exist. As Dr. Richard Benkin wrote for Canada Free Press in 2009:


"So, in Jimmy Carter’s world, Israel’s daring to insist that it be recognized as the Jewish homeland—only the very reason why it exists and the historical basis for it—cannot be allowed. It is the obstacle to peace, not the Arabs’ refusal to accept it.

Carter’s rationale for thinking that, however, is really the smoking gun of his anti-Semitism; specifically, that Jews make up less than 100 percent of Israel’s population. Funny, though, he applies this argument to the world’s only Jewish state, and never has done the same to any other country. Mr. Carter seems to consider himself rather knowledgeable in world affairs. If he is, then his omission is one based on bias rather than ignorance. There are 27 countries where Islam is the official state religion, including Egypt, Jordan, and Saudi Arabia, which border Israel. The 24 others are: Afghanistan, Algeria, Bahrain, Bangladesh, Brunei, Comoros, Indonesia, Iran, Iraq,

Kuwait, Libya, Malaysia, Maldives, Mauritania, Morocco, Oman, Pakistan, Qatar, Sahrawi Arab Democratic Republic, Somalia, Somaliland, Tunisia, United Arab Emirates, and Yemen. Several of them, such as Bangladesh, have sizeable non-Muslim minorities; and many with almost none, such as Pakistan, destroyed its non-Muslim minority even while Carter was its ally!

To be comprehensive, 12 countries (plus England, Scotland, and 17 Swiss Cantons) recognize Christianity as their state religion, and Buddhism is the official state religion in three. Carter has never made a peep about any of the 42 countries with an official state religion. He certainly never complained to his Saudi allies or the Jordanians because they prohibit Jews from residing in their countries.

Yet, Carter has seen fit to call Israel’s desire to be recognized as the historical Jewish homeland it is as 'an obstacle to peace.' This despite the fact Israel allows free practice of all religions, unlike most of the 27 Islamic nations including Saudi Arabia which makes any religious expression other than Islam a crime."


The rest of the left followed The Peanut Farmer's lead and decided that Israel had no right to exist. (An opinion many on the left still hold today. Go to and read some threads if you don't believe me.) When Carter was thrashed by Ronald Reagan in the '80 elections, the American left briefly forgot about their radical Islamic allies. This was due to three reasons: 1) Ronald Reagan was immensely popular with the American people and Reagan's attitude to Israel's right to exist was the exact opposite of the hated Carter's. 2) 220 Marines and 21 sailors were killed in the 1983 Beruit barracks bombing and the American public was quickly beginning to realize that radical Islam was extremely dangerous and most prominent lefties did not want to be ssen outwardly supporting any radical Islamic cause. 3) The American left is full of idiots who can't walk and chew gum at the same time. They were too busy blaming Reagan for the AIDS epidemic to pay too much attention to radical Islamic causes.

After Reagan left office as the most beloved President of the 20th century, his successor, George H.W. Bush, had to do the one thing Reagan never really wanted to do: go to war. Former Carlos The Jackal associate and Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein decided that Kuwait was a part of Iraq and decided to take it by force. Thus, Hussein sent his ragtag army into Kuwait, slaughtering women and children, and making a general pest of himself. Bush the First rightly realized that this could be the spark that could start World War III and acted immediately to slap some sense into Saddam Hussein. Thus, American troops were stationed in Saudi Arabia as a part of Operation Desert Storm. The American public responded positively and started tying yellow ribbons on every tree and lamp post they could to show support for the troops. The American left, however, did not, and they began to chant "No blood for oil". However, the anti-war movement fizzled, much to the dismay of the left, as the Desert Storm conflict was a blow-out in the America's favor. (It was like the Green Bay Packers versus a high school team.)

The left may have whiffed on recreating the '60's with Desert Storm, but they were able to create the illusion that the US was an imperialist power that was willing to kill and maim for oil. That line of thinking gave the left the moronic idea that radical Islamists weren't terrorists at all, they were freedom fighters. When al-Qaeda attacked the US on 9/11, many on the radical left didn't grieve like most Americans did. They began reaffirm their love for their radical Islamic comrades. For example, black liberation theologist Jeremiah Wright said:


"We have supported state terrorism against the Palestinians and black South Africans, and now we are indignant because the stuff we have done overseas is now brought right back to our own front yards. America's chickenssssss..... are coming home to roost!"


Yup...We're coming to the part you've been waiting for....

After 9/11, President George W. Bush realized that waiting around to be attacked by radical Islamists wasn't the best of ideas, so he decided to go after the after the biggest threat to world peace at the time, Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein. American, Israeli, and British intelligence agencies all confirmed that Hussein was stockpiling weapons of mass destruction. This was especially troubling since Hussein was more than willing to use them, like when he used chemical weapons against the Kurds. (An incident that the left conveniently tosses into the nearest Memory Hole when discusssing the Iraq war.) On March 20th, 2003, the United States invaded Iraq.

At first, the left went along with the invasion. (At the time, Bush was still very popular.) However, when it appeared that that the intelligence that Bush had may have been wrong and the Iraqi WMD program was not as far along as was initially believed, the left showed their true unpatriotic colors and the anti-war movement was born. The anti-war groups like, Code Pinko, and the like, revived the narrative that radical Islam wasn't the aggressor, it was America that was the aggressor. The lamestream leftist media that hated George W. Bush from the moment he was sworn in, jumped on the anti-war bandwagon immediately. From the primordial ooze of anti-war sentiment mixed with a renewed "understanding" of radical Islam, a star arose.

That star was Barack Hussein Obama.

Barack Obama was no ordinary leftist. He not only had ties with radical Islam, he also had ties with the radical left. He was a friend to Weather Underground founder Bill Ayers and PLO operative Rashid Khalidi. He was educated in an Islamic school in Indonesia as well as the liberal Occidental and Columbia universities. He was charismatic, and according to Chris "I'll Have Another Drink" Matthews, quite the looker.

During the '08 Popularity Contest, the lamestream media buried facts about Obama's past, including:

•Barack Obama was not even eligible to be President. (His father was a British subject, thus Obama did not have the natural born citizenship required to assume the Presidency.)

•Barack Obama may have also held Indonesian citizenship at one point to attend school in Indonesia. (This also makes Dear Leader ineligible for the Presidency.)

•Barack Obama was a rather devout Muslim as a child. In fact, his Indonesian school records have have him listed as a Muslim.

•In 1981, Barack Obama spent three weeks in Pakistan. At the time, it would have been impossible for an American to do so, since the military junta that ran Pakistan at the time did not have the warmest relations with the US. A US passport would not have gotten Obama into Pakistan, but an Indonesian passport would have gotten Obama in without any problems.

•Barack Obama had many ties to the radical left. He attended socialist rallies, associated with Marxist-Leninists (Interesting facts: The previously mentioned Red Army Faction and Japanese Red Army considered themselves Marxist-Leninists, and so did Carlos The Jackal. While there's no evidence of Obama explicitly supporting the Red Army Faction, the Japanese Red Army, or Carlos The Jackal, there is certainly a call for concern when someone seeking to become Leader of the Free World associates with people who share the same ideology as vicious international terrorists. However, in his autobiography Dreams From My Father, Obama talks about discussing the works of Frantz Fanon, who advocated "revolutionary violence". Needless to say, Fanon was a really big influence on organizations like the Red Army Faction and the Japanese Red Army.)

•While in the Imperial Senate, Obama proposed the Global Poverty Act that would have sent billions of US taxpayer dollars to many Third World nations. Luckily, the bill died and never became law.

With the lamestream media cheering him on, Obama defeated John McPain in the '08 Popularity Contest. Almost immediately, newly appointed Secretary of State Hillary Clinton handed 900 million dollars to Hamas, a radical Islamic group that controlled the Gaza Strip. If that wasn't galling enough, Obama went on his infamous European Apology Tour, in which he apologized to old, tired, socialist Europe for the US being "arrogant" and "dismissive" of Europe's "leading role" in the world. Not too much after that, Obama also outraged patriotic Americans with his equally infamous Cairo speech. In this speech, our Dear Leader spoke of the "grandeur" that was Islam while saying nothing positive about the US. Granted, none of the above are crimes, but who outside of the far left would hold these positions ? Why would an American President visit a Muslim country and talk up Islam while American troops were engaged in Muslim countries battling radical Islamists ?

Equally troubling were the acts of of the Secetary of Homeland Security Janet From Another Planet Napolitano. Upon her confirmation by the Imperial Senate, Napolitano unsucessfully tried to make the word "terrorism" an unword and replace it with the dubious term "man-made disaster". Not only that, Napolitano's stooges released a report titled "Rightwing Extremism: Current Economic and Political Climate Fueling Resurgence in Radicalization and Recruitment. In this report, Napolitano made it seem that the greatest threat to the United States wasn't radical Islam, it was the imaginary radical right. ( Under Napolitano's less than stellar watch, only dumb luck saved the United States from another 9/11 style attack. Homeland Security procedures failed in the cases of the Christmas Day Underwear Bomber who tried to blow up a plane over Detroit and Faisal Shazaad, the Times Square Bomber, almost succeeded in killing hundreds with a car bomb attack in New York. If that wasn't bad enough, Homeland Security also dropped the ball on Major Nidal Hassan, an Army traitor who shot up Fort Hood, killing almost two dozen American solidiers. The maddening thing about that epsiode is the fact that DHS already knew Hassan was on record with the Army as being sypathetic to radical Islam and Hassan was in contact with Anwar al-Awlaki, an American born radical Islamic terrorist. Even at its most incompetent, the federal "government" is usually better than this.

At the Department of Injustice, Attorney General and Oprah Winfrey's boyfriend look-alike Eric Holder was doing his level headed best to defy popular opinion and common sense. After Chairman Obama decided to close down the Guantanamo Bay prison with no place to put the inhuman filth that resided there, Holder decided it would be a swell idea to try 9/11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed in and several of his cohorts in New York, spitting distance from Ground Zero. Only public outcry from New Yorkers prevented the city from becoming an al-Qaeda target once again. Holder also killed prosecution of the New Black Panthers and their voter intimidation case. (The New Black Panthers also have ties to radical Islam. They associate with Calypso Louie Farrakhan and his Nation of Islam, who in turn has ties to Mommar Qadaffi, the Libyan dictator and sponsor of international terror.) Again, governmental stupidity like turtle tunnels and fish ladders is one thing, criminal negligence is quite another.

Chairman Obama's reign of terror has also included many other bizarre tidbits that should raise some eyebrows, such as:

•sending the exact number of troops to Haiti (10,000) that he shorted General Stanley McCrystal in Afganistan.

•announcing his support for the construction of a victory mosque at Ground Zero at a White House Iftar dinner.

•not saying a thing when Secretary of State Hillary Clinton announced that she was Jew-hating al-Jazeera's number one fan.

•having NASA make Muslims feel good about their contributions to science.

Outside of the federal "government", the left was hard at work for their radical Islamic allies. Bernadine Dohrn, William Ayers' ugly half and another one of Chairman Obama's "neighbors" was a part of a flotilla that attempted to break Israel's blockade of the Gaza strip. Code Pinko was involved the military coup that overthrew Hosni Mubarak in Egypt. The silence of the federal "government" on these acts is telling, despite the fact that they endanger national security. "Telling" may not be the best word to use here. Maybe "chilling" is more appropriate.

The ball is in your court, Congressman King. Do you want the truth ? It's there for the taking.

God help us all.

Wednesday, March 9, 2011

Pseudo-Jews And Crickets

From James O'Keefe's sting on NPR empty suits Betsy Liley and Ron Schiller:


On the Jewish influence of media coverage:

Fake Muslim: … The extent to which Jews do kind of control the media. I mean, certainly the Zionists and the people who have the interest in swaying media coverage toward a favorable direction of Israel. The Palestinian viewpoint since NPR is one of the few places that has the courage to really present it. It was kind of a joke that we used to call it National Palestinian Radio.

Lilely: Oh, really? That’s good. I like that.

Fake Muslim: I’m not too upset about maybe a little bit less Jew influence of Jewish money into NPR. The Zionist coverage is quite substantial elsewhere …

Schiller: I don’t actually find it at NPR.

Fake Muslim: What exactly?

Schiller: The Zionist or pro-Israel even among funders. … I mean, it’s there in those who own newspapers obviously, but no one owns NPR. So actually, I don’t find it.

Fake Muslim: I just think what Israel does, I don’t think, can be excused frequently, so I’m glad to hear that. …

[Lilely talks about how one of NPR’s funders, the American Jewish World Service, doesn’t necessarily agree with NPR’s perspectives always.]

Schiller: Right because I think they are really looking for a fair point of view and many Jewish organizations are not. Frankly, many organizations … I’m sure there are Muslim organizations that are not looking for a fair point of view. They’re looking for a very particular point of view and that’s fine.

Fake Muslim:We’re not one of them.

Schiller: I’m gathering that you’re not.

Fake Muslim: Our funding comes from a place like the Muslim Brotherhood. You look at the way they are demonized and looked down on and shown as horrible, terrible people when they are simply just trying to help.

Lilely: Sadly, our history from the record … shows that we’ve done this before. We put Japanese Americans in camps in World War II.


I feel like a broken record, but what the hell ? Maybe THIS time, I'll get an answer. we go....


Once again, the Pseudo-Jews of Abe Foxman's All Democrat League (ADL) and the George $oros funded Jewish Funds for Justice have decided to remain silent on the apparent antisemitism of the 2+2=5 Left. As of this writing, neither Abie-Baby Foxman, head of the ADL or Simon Greer, the $oros puppet running the Jewish Funds for Justice, have decided to comment on Ron Schiller's Protocols of the Elders of Zion-like comments about "Zionist" control of the media.

Now, don't get me wrong: Politicalcorrectthink sickens me to the core. I despise it when the Leftist Thinkpol screams racism at every little thing, so, no, I don't want bottomfeeders like Greer and Foxman wagging their finger at every offense real or imagined. However, this latest NPR scandal IS NOT some gray area comment that can be construed a million different ways by a million different people. This is two executives from a major media outlet (that taxpayers help fund) happily chirping along about the imaginary Jewish control of the media with two individuals claiming to receive money and support from the Muslim Brotherhood, which, at last check, helped to turn the Middle East from Crazy to Certifiably Bat-Sh*t Crazy. Call me crazy and off my meds, but if you're running an organization like Foxman's All Democrat League that allegedly protects Jews from defamation or a $oros lackey like Greer that runs an organization that supposedly works to "create a just, fair, and compassionate America", shouldn't you be pouncing on crap like this ? Oh, wait...I forgot! Leftists NEVER pounce on fellow leftists! Oy, I am soooo touched in the head today!

Instead, the All Democrats League's website is still crying about the Afrofascist Calypso Louie Farrakhan and his 978,645th antisemitic rant and cheering on Natalie Portman ( and Pharoah $oros and his anti-Israelites at the Jewish Funds for Justice are busy worshiping the false idol known as the New York Slimes and their rumor that Glenn Beck is leaving FOX News. ( Again, "let me be perfectly clear", as a very famous Kenyan Socialist likes to say: I am not asking for lib Thinkpol looking to enforce politicalcorrectthink standards. The last thing the world needs is an army of Katie Couric clones manufacturing fake outrage the way China manufactures fake dog poop. The only thing I'm asking for is honesty and fairness. That's not too much to ask, is it ?

"That which is altogether just shalt thou follow, that thou mayest live, and inherit the land which the LORD thy God giveth thee." --Deuteronomy 16:20

Sunday, March 6, 2011

A Glimpse Into The Evil That Lurks In The Progressivevik Soul

For months now, I have repeatedly warned of the evil of the Progressivevik movement. During these long months, I've been called a Right Wing nutjob, a racist, an antisemite, a homophobe, an Islamophobe, a Glenn Beck wannabe, blah, blah, blah, yadda, yadda, yadda. Quite frankly, if a day goes by that I'm not personally attacked or called a "FAUX News zombie" by some outraged leftist, well, it's like a day without sunshine, pilgrim.

See, the reason why all of that nonsense rolls off my back is this: I'm right. I know 2+2=4, not 5.

For proof, let's look at two quotes: One from Sherrod Brown The Clown, the dingbat Imperial Senator from Ohio (I don't really need to tell you what party this bottom feeder is from, do I ?) and the other one is from America's first foreign-born President, Barack Hussein Obama.


“I look back in history, in some of the worst governments that we had, you know the first thing they did, go after unions, Hitler didn’t want unions, Stalin didn’t want unions, Mubarak didn’t want unions, these autocrats don’t want independent unions." ---Inner Party Member Sherrod Brown The Clown


"Egyptians have inspired us, and they've done so by putting the lie to the idea that justice is best gained through violence." ---Chairman Obama


Both of these quotes came after Hosni Mubarak was forced out of office and the Egyptian military took over in what can be accurately called a Latin American style junta. Immediately after the military took over, the Egyptian declared martial law and dissolved the parliament. Now, put your thinking cap on: Does that sound like freedom to you ? A military junta ? Yes, Mubarak was a dirtbag dictator, but is a military junta any better ?

Of course not. I know that and you know that. But to the Authoritarian Left, however, it is. "It's freedom!"they cry out to the heavens between bong hits. In reality, it's yet another a glimpse of the evil that surges through the heart of the Progressivevik movement.

The Progressivevik movement doesn't give a damn about individual freedom, liberty, Free Speech, or any other concept that makes America great. They love dictatorial, centralized government. That's why they cheered on Woodrow Wilson as he jailed dissidents during World War I. It's also why they put up with Franklin Dictator Roosevelt and his Blue Eagle command economy (And elected that miserable old SOB four times). It's why they established the Fairness Doctrine. It's also why you hear nothing but crickets from the lamestream media when it comes to Chairman Obama giving Judge Roger Vinson the proverbial middle finger and still implementing Obamacareless. Call me crazy and off my meds, but I'd be hard pressed to call this crap the rule of law, wouldn't you ?

Wake up, America! WAKE THE HELL UP! If it isn't Obama and his cronies that do us in, it will be the next wave of Progressiveviks that will. Everyday, a little more of our liberty is being stripped away by these racists (like Calypso Louie Farrakhan, the Afrofascist), by these eugenicists (like John Holdren, our UNELECTED science "czar" who thinks putting sterilents in drinking water is a swell way to control population growth), by these Maoists (like Anita Dunn, the former White House Communications Director who loves Mao so and Ron Bloom, our UNELECTED manufacturing czar who thinks political power comes from a barrel of a gun), by these propagandists (the entire lamestream media), and a whole host of others, in and out of government. With every fiat and every lie they utter, they chip away at what's left of America. For almost a 100 years, the left has been pecking away at our freedom like a vulture feeding on a corpse. We can't stand idly by any more and allow this crap to continue. Our very existence as a nation depends on stopping these power hungry monsters. They must be defeated in 2012, no ifs, ands, or buts about it.

 (*WHEW*! How does Mark Levin do it ? I need a nap after typing the above paragraph.)

 To close, I'd like to quote my personal hero, Ronald Reagan:


"If we lose freedom here, there is no place to escape to. This is the last stand on Earth." ---Ronald Reagan


God help us all.

Saturday, March 5, 2011

The Pseudo-Jews: Asleep At The Switch Again!

Recently, Sherrod Brown The Clown (S-OH), had this to say on the Imperial Senate floor:


“I look back in history, in some of the worst governments that we had, you know the first thing they did, go after unions, Hitler didn’t want unions, Stalin didn’t want unions, Mubarak didn’t want unions, these autocrats don’t want independent unions."


Not to be outdone in the Ignorant Liberal Pig department, Louis Farrakhan, better known as Calypso Louie to Rush Limbaugh fans, had this to say at a Nation of Islam Afrofascism jamboree : (Hat tip: FReeper Sheik Yerbouty for first coining the term "Afrofascism" and allowing me to use it. No, it's not a racist term. Relax.)


"Zionists dominate the US government and banks."


“President Obama, if you allow the Zionists to push you, to mount a military offensive against Gaddafi and you go in and kill him and his sons, as you did with Saddam Hussein and his sons... I’m warning you this is a Libyan problem, let the Libyans solve their problem among themselves.”


“Zionists dominate the government of the United States of America and her banking system.”


“Some of you think that I’m just somebody who’s got something out for the Jewish people.Do you think I would waste my time if I did not think it was important for you to know Satan? My job is to pull the cover off of Satan so that he will never deceive you and the people of the world again.”


OK...Jewish Funds For Justice...Where's your outrage ? Where's the letter from 400 rabbis ? Where's the jihad against Sherrod Brown The Clown and Calypso Louie The Afrofascist ? Why isn't Simon Greer, your CEO, demanding that Brown and Farrakhan apologize ? Why is that picture of a sweaty Glenn Beck still headlining your website ? (See it here: Unrelated, but why is there not one mention of God or a Star of David to be found on this supposedly religious site ?) Why aren't you skewering Sherrod Brown The Clown and Calypso Louie The Afrofascist like you skewered Beck ? After all, Sherrod Brown The Clown is altering the history of the Holocaust, like Glenn Beck supposedly did. (FYI--the Nazis loved unions. They even had a program named "Strength Through Joy" to keep the members of the German Workers Front, the official Nazi union, happy.) Calypso Louie The Afrofascist sounds like he wants to start another Holocaust. Where's the outrage ? Well ? WELL!?

Oh---I get it. Only attacks against your Nazi collaborating Socialist $ugar Daddy George Soro$ can be construed as antisemitism. Only liberal Jews should be defended, right ? Mark Levin, Jonah Goldberg, and David Horowitz can be slandered day in and day out, but that's ok because they're Conservatives, right ? The rank and file Jews like myself can be insulted and ridiculed by a race hustler like Calypso Louie The Afrofascist, but that's all "good in the 'hood" because Farrakhan is a lib who thinks 2+2=5 and social justice is a swell idea. Please stop me if I'm wrong, Jewish Funds for Justice. And the Sherrod Brown The Clown thing ? Oh, I guess throwing facts about Nazi Germany into the nearest Memory Hole is perfectly acceptable as long as it furthers a leftist cause, like letting greedy public sector unions destroy states like Wisconsin. Isn't that right, Simon Greer, you misrable little putz ?

Speaking of miserable little putzes, Abe Foxman of the ADL (which does NOT stand for Anti-Defamation League, by the way. It stands for All Democrats League.) went through the motions and blasted Calypso Louie The Afrofascist for his Protocols of the Elders of Zion like speech. Of course, there were crickets to be heard on the Sherrod Brown The Clown matter, as it is strict ADL policy to never, ever criticize a fellow lib. If you'd like, you can read the boring press release here: I'll wait right here. All done ? Glad to have you back, True Believer! Did you notice something was missing from that stale-as-hell press release ? I'll give you a hint: His first name is Barack. His last name is Obama, and no, he has no birth certificate proving that he is eligible to be President of The United States. (Only Farrakhan mentions the Failed Messiah in the press release.) That's right-- Abie Baby's minions have forgotten to include the fact that Calypso Louie The Afrofascist endorsed Chairman Obama during the '08 Popularity Contest. Guess what else Abie Baby's hacks "forgot" ? Calypso Louie The Afrofascist has a long running relationship with Jeremiah Wright, Chairman Obama's sinister minister of 20 years. (Jeremiah Wrong is no slouch in the Jew hating department himself. In addition to blaming America for 9/11, Jeremiah Wrong likes to say "them Jews" and other Julius Streicher-like comments.) Well, Abie Baby ? Are you going to comment ? These crickets are really annoying....and telling.

Here's the point: Liberals could care less about minorities. (Case and point: Have you noticed that the NAACP now stands for the National Assocaition for the Advancement of Communist Principles ? I have. Another rant for another time.) Whether it's a Jew like me, Americans of African descent, Americans of Latino descent, or any other minority group, they see us as one thing and one thing only: pawns in their mad quest for power. They'll patronize, create tension, let others spit on the memory of the Holocaust, or do whatever it takes to seize power. I know I've had enough of this nonsense for a lifetime. Have you, America ?

"And ye shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you free."-- John 8:32

Wednesday, March 2, 2011

Why Socialism Sucks

Let's take a stroll down Memory Hole Lane. Let's go back to that sunny day in 2008, when Kenya's favorite socialist, Chairman Barack Hussein Obama, said this to a plumber :


"...I think when you spread the wealth around, it’s good for everybody." --Barack Hussein Obama to Joe the Plumber


Chairman Obama didn't say anything profound here. This has been the mantra of the villianous Left ever since Woodrow Wilson segregated the Armed Forces. It's a tenet of the Social Justice Gospel that states the rich must pay through the nose since it's pretty "obvious" that they must have "cheated" the system to get what they have.

Another way to put it is this:


"From each according to his ability, to each according to his need" --Karl Marx


Both quotes call for the redistribution of wealth. Both quotes talk about who needs to give the wealth and who needs to get it. However, neither quote addresses the most important questions: Who gets the wealth ? Why do they deserve it ?

Marx and our Dear Leader never bothered to address the questions of 'who gets it ?' and 'why do they deserve it ?'. However, I use my head for more than a hat rack and unlike Chris "I'll Have Another Drink" Matthews (Hat Tip: The Great One, Mark Levin.), I don't bloviate to hear myself bloviate. I speak the truth. Without further ado, I will now show how socialism sucks.

To prove my point, I'm going to enlist some friends of mine: Subject A, Subject B, Subject C, and Subject D.

Subject A is your typical working stiff. He goes to work every day, despite the fact that he hates his job and his boss. He deals with unreasonable customers, nonsensical demands from the bookkeeper, and works the crappiest hours you could think of. He has bags under his eyes, high blood pressure, and back pain that never seems to go away. He takes it all in stride since this is what he has to do take care of his family. He pays his taxes, (federal, state, and local) obeys the law, and in general, is a good citizen.

Subject B is a burned out teacher. At one point, Subject B was an average (at best) teacher, but no longer. Thanks to tenure, Subject B was all but untouchable, despite getting poor review after review. Thus, Subject B was able to survive 32 years in the public school system without so much as breaking a sweat. Subject B is getting ready to retire, with a guarantee that she'll receive at least 80% of her final salary, which is a rather generous $83,500 per year.

Subject C is a welfare recipient. She is a living, breathing example of a "welfare queen". She has four kids, two with one father, one with another man, and one that she has no idea who the father is. She recieves state aid, along with Food Stamps, Medicaid, and unemployment. Oh--I forgot! She's pregnant again! Who's the father ? I dunno and neither does she.

Subject D is an illegal alien. He pays no taxes, but has access to all kinds of goodies from the Sanctuary City he lives in. He gets free health care, his kids can go to school and get "free" breakfast and lunch. He doesn't speak English, but there's no need to learn. After all, the Big Mommy Regime will print any form he needs in his native tongue and will always provide a translator when he needs to know how many more freebies are out there for him to take advantage of.

So tell me: Why does Subject A have to pay for B, C, or D's crap ? Why does A owe B,C, or D anything ?

Now, your average lib fingersniffer thinks he has an answer: compassion. "That's the price you pay to live in a civilized society. What would you do, let people starve ? How much is enough ? How much do you really need ? Blah, blah, blah, 2+2=5, yadda, yadda yadda." But, if you'll note, there is NEVER, ever, compassion for the Subject A's ,who are, in reality, the majority of Americans.Your below average wallet chain wearing, tattooed, Media Matters believing lib never takes into consideration the fact that to give B, C, and D anything, it must be first taken by FORCE from A. Never mind the fact that Subject A is up to his eyeballs in debt and could really use the money for his own bills, he has to pay for B and C's leisure time. Never mind the fact that Subject A would like a brand new AR-15 or a laptop that doesn't crash all time, A must pay to subsidize to D's criminal lifestyle. Where the hell is the compassion in that ? It's Subject A who earned the money, why are B, C, and D entitled to it ?

There are no answers to any of the questions that socialism brings up. Yes, we must love our neighbor as the Bible commands, but "love thy neighbor" does not mean "support thy neigbor while he sips a margarita on a hammock while you work yourself into an early grave." Ethically, as a society, we have a responsibility to care for those who TRULY can not care for themselves, (wounded veterans, children, the very elderly, children, the infirm, etc.) but we have no responsibility to those who refuse to do so, like Subjects B, C, D. That's why socialism sucks. It can't answer the most basic of questions: Why ?