Tuesday, February 8, 2011

The Jihad Of The Pseudo-Jews

My "friends" at the Jewish Funds For Justice have published this little snippett on their site, probably at the behest of their Nazi collaborating benefactor, George Soros:


"Finally, Beck doesn’t just invoke Nazis and the Holocaust to demonize people more often than any other prominent figure in America. He is advancing a worldview that asserts, counterfactually, that progressives during the first half of the 20th century paved the way for Nazism — and that today’s progressives are doing the same thing. While other people use the word Nazi for effect, Beck has placed his warped understanding of the shared DNA of Nazism and progressivism at the center of his show. This is not just hyperbolic rhetoric. This is historical revisionism. And it has an effect. In a 2009 report, the ADL labeled Beck the 'fearmonger-in-chief,' noting that the claims made on his show 'play an important role in drawing people further out of the mainstream, making them more receptive to the more extreme notions and conspiracy theories.' "



"Counter factual" ? "Historical revisionism" ?

Surely they jest. Ahhh...you gotta love it when the 2+2=5'ers use words that they can't use intelligently in a sentence. It's soooo cute when they try!

It's common knowledge that the Progressivevik movement was enamored with the National SOCIALIST German Workers Party and their Fascist counterparts in Italy. (In fact, noted science fiction writer and Progressive boot licker H.G. Wells was the first to coin the term "liberal fascism".) They were in awe of the Mussolini's ability to "make the trains run on time", just as they were in awe of Adolf Hitler's plans for a "master race". These were Progressive concepts that failed to take root in the US, but they were coming to life in Germany and Italy. (For example, Margret Sanger, patron saint of the Pro-Choice movement, actually based her theories on eugenics. She cooked the idea of birth control to help keep the black population in the United States under control.) Now, I could sit here and give you a sterling book report about Jonah Goldberg's Liberal Fascism, but that would rob you, the reader of the joys of reading this great tome if haven't already. (Read this book, True Believer! You won't be disappointed.)

Instead, I'm going to prove it, with help from one of all my all time favorite movies, Judgement at Nuremberg, a fictionalized trial of the Nazi judges. It's a great flick with a laundry list of Hollywood stars making several appearences, such as Burt Lancaster, Marlene Dietrich, Judy Garland, William Shatner, and even the guy who played Colonel Klink in Hogan's Heroes. (Werner Klemperer). It was a fantastic movie that ran away with an armload of Academy Awards. (This is when the awards actually meant something.) Needless to say, Judgement at Nuremberg wasn't some indie flick looking for some "street cred" nor was it a "Right Wing propaganda" piece. It was a major motion picture that some have decided to throw in the nearest Memory Hole.

Why ? Because it paints a less than flattering view of the Progressive Movement. Check out the scene below, as Rolfe, defense attorney for the accused Nazi judges, rips into Dr. Wickert, a prosecution witness.


Rolfe: From journals and books? I see. You referred to "Novel National Socialist measures introduced among them sexual sterilization". Are you aware that sexual sterilization but had been advanced for years before in dealing with the mentally incompetent

and the criminal ?

Wickert: Yes. I am aware of that.

Rolfe: Are you aware that it has advocates among leading citizens in other countries ?

Wickert: I am not an expert on such laws.

Rolfe: Then permit me to read one to you. This is a High Court opinion, upholding such laws in existence in another country. And I quote:

"We have seen more than once that the public welfare may call upon the best citizens for their lives. It would be strange indeed, if it could not call upon those who already sapped the strength in order to prevent our being swamped by incompetence. It is better for all the world

if, instead of waiting to execute degenerate offsprings for crime or to let them starve for their imbecility, society can prevent their propagation by medical means in the first place. Three generations of imbeciles are enough." Do you recognize it now, Dr. Wickert ?

Wickert: No, sir, I don't.

Rolfe: Actually, there is no particular reason you should. since the opinion upholds the sterilization law in the State of Virginia, of the United States and was written and delivered by that great American jurist, Supreme Court Justice, Oliver Wendell Holmes.


(From Abby Mann's original script, Judgement at Nuremberg)


Now, back to the Pseudo-Jews of the Jewish Funds for Justice and their endless jihad against Glenn Beck.

What's the deal ? Why on God's green and cooling earth would you bury the historical roots of Nazism ? Why ? Is George Soros's blood money that important that we must forget the roots of the Nazi party ? Are we to forget the fact that a good portion of Nazi theory was developed in the United States by the Progressive Movement ?

If Never Again is to actually mean never again, we can't just ignore the past. We have to learn from it.

God help us all.

No comments: