Thursday, December 16, 2010

If You Put A Liberal's Brain In A Bird....

.....The bird would fly backwards.






Need proof other than the fraud that is Chairman Obama and his economic policy ? Check out this conversation I had on Media Matters :







--------------------------------------------------------------------------------





• by Absolutely Nobama (December 15, 2010 1:06 pm ET)



Being a socialist is nothing to be proud of.





After all, Nazi is short for National SOCIALIST German Workers Party.



◦ by foghornleghorn (December 15, 2010 1:13 pm ET)



I'm a socialist as well. The Nazis were not socialists.



You apparently believe that just because the word socialist is in their name then they have to be socialists.



You're a simpleton.



■ by Absolutely Nobama (December 15, 2010 1:25 pm ET)



From The Nazi Party Platform, 1920



"We demand that the state be charged first with providing the opportunity for a livelyhood and a way of life for the citizens."



That's not exactly right wing propaganda, now is it?





■ by Absolutely Nobama (December 15, 2010 1:31 pm ET)



"We must put an end to both economic freeloading and economic exploitation in America. There must be no place for parasites who draw their sustenance from society without giving anything in return. Those who thrive on usury, speculation, money-manipulation, and monopoly form a special class today whose primary interest is the maintenance of the system which allows their form of parasitism to flourish in the first place. We must have an economy based on the long-term interests of the man who works for a living, not the chronic loafer or the man who lives by renting out his capital."





■ by Absolutely Nobama (December 15, 2010 1:36 pm ET)



Guess where I got that from ?





http://www.americannaziparty.com/rockwell/materials/articles/stand.php



Yeah, more right wing propaganda. Idiot.





■ by congero6189599 (December 15, 2010 1:58 pm ET)



Yea and I remember all the Neo-Nazi's marching with Martin Luther King for civil rights. You dummy what Rockwell was attacking were the "Jews."

"

Hitler wasn't talking about "all" the people just the fairytale "master white Aryans race." The NAZI's weren't socialist they were fascist owned and financed by national and international finance capital. The first thing Hitler did was arrest and kill the communist,socialist and trade unionist. Infact his attacks and rhetoric closely resemble yours and every other conservative at this site. Attacks on unions,attacks on so-called socialist and communist. You are living proof of the 7 fools analogy I made above and you call someone else an idiot after making such studpic statements? Amazing!





■ by Absolutely Nobama (December 15, 2010 11:07 pm ET)

1

In the 700 pages of Mein Kampf, the word fascist is only used twice. Why don't you libs actually read books before commenting on them ?





■ by Absolutely Nobama (1 hour and 19 minutes ago)



Where does the word "Jew" appear in the above post, lackwit ?





■ by foghornleghorn (December 15, 2010 1:39 pm ET)



Nice to see you can use teh google.



The Nazis were FASCISTS, not socialists.









■ by Absolutely Nobama (December 15, 2010 1:43 pm ET)



Fascism and socialism are the same thing. Both hold the state as supreme, not the individual.



Still no remarks on the proof I have provided you not once, but twice ?





■ by congero6189599 (December 15, 2010 2:03 pm ET)

4 1

Fascism and socialism are the same? Wow! The stupid on this one is amazing!





■ by RedandWhite Guerilla (December 15, 2010 3:13 pm ET)



Nazis and Socialist kind of killed each other in the Second World War, in droves I might add. I was freaken enemy #1 Stalin who practically won the war for us.



Now how do two ideologies, that are so close to one another, go about committing acts of genocide on one another? Doesn't work does it?





■ by Absolutely Nobama (December 15, 2010 11:19 pm ET)



Where does it say socialists can't kill each other ? No, your murdering hero did not win WWII for the US, Hitler was too stupid to take Moscow when he had the chance.



Reread the last two posts I made. They come straight from the horses' mouths, the Nazis themselves.





■ by Johaely (December 15, 2010 1:53 pm ET)



Hey dumba$$, when did Hitler rise to power in the nazi party?





■ by Absolutely Nobama (December 15, 2010 11:11 pm ET)



What does that have to do with anything ?





■ by Johaely (1 hour and 53 minutes ago)



Everything. You seem to beleive that the national socialist party was the same that it was before Hitler took the reigns and turned it into what it is known now. He joined the party as an infiltrator. He was in no way a socialist considering he also exterminated anyone who was member of a union, communist or socialist.



Does being so damn simple minded hurt? Can you make a nuanced though, like ever?





■ by Absolutely Nobama (1 hour and 45 minutes ago)



Uneducated Twit: The Nazi Party was barely a blip on the radar screen when Hitler joined. He was the 55th member.



Please read a book. I promise it won't hurt.





■ by Johaely (1 hour and 23 minutes ago)



You really did not read what you wrote. You know, people living in glass houses shouldn't be throwing stones.





■ by Absolutely Nobama (1 hour and 17 minutes ago)



Did you or did you not read the last post ?





■ by Johaely (1 hour and 5 minutes ago)



Uneducated Twit: The Nazi Party was barely a blip on the radar screen when Hitler joined. He was the 55th member.





I'll admit i messed up the chonology but what you are doing is still disingenous. The Nazi party had nationalistic leanings (don't you idiots accuse anybody to the left of you of being unpatriotic?). Even though it beleived in profit sharing, it did so through corporatism rather than communatiarism. It was at most socialist in idea only. It also despised the traditional socialists, the egalitarian ones, and communists. To try to lump them together is just malicious ignorance.

Reply Report Abuse



■ by Absolutely Nobama (46 minutes ago)



And in practice. The Nazis were socialists.





■ by Johaely (38 minutes ago)



In practice they were fascists.



Let's see wikipedia's definition for socialism:





Socialism is an economic and political theory advocating public or common ownership and cooperative management of the means of production and allocation of resources. A socialist society is characterised by a free association, which is not based on coercive wage labour. It is organized on the basis of relatively equal power relations, self-management, collective decision-making and adhocracy rather than hierarchical, bureaucratic forms of organization in the economic and political systems.









And now Nazism:





Nazism (Nationalsozialismus, National Socialism; alternatively spelled Naziism[1]) was the ideology and practice of the Nazi Party and of Nazi Germany.[2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9] It was a unique variety of fascism that involved biological racism and antisemitism.[10] Nazism presented itself as politically syncretic, incorporating policies, tactics and philosophies from right- and left-wing ideologies; in practice, Nazism was a far right form of politics.[11]



The Nazis believed in the supremacy of an Aryan master race and claimed that Germans represent the most pure Aryan nation.[12] They argued that Germany's survival as a modern great nation required it to create a New Order รข€” an empire in Europe that would give the German nation the necessary land mass, resources, and expansion of population needed to be able to economically and militarily compete with other powers.[13]



The Nazis claimed that Jews were the greatest threat to the Aryan race and the German nation. They considered Jews a parasitic race that attached itself to various ideologies and movements to secure its self-preservation, such as: the Enlightenment, liberalism, democracy, parliamentary politics, capitalism, industrialisation, Marxism and trade unionism.[14]









If anything nazism was its own branch of beleif.



■ by Absolutely Nobama (1 hour and 24 minutes ago)



"The NSDAP [The Nazis] and the DSP [The German Socialist Party] had arisen with the SAME ULTIMATE AIMS [emphasis mine], yet absolutely independent of each other. The main fighter for the DSP, as I have said, was Julius Streicher. At first he, too, had a holy conviction of the mission and the future of his movement. But as soon he could recognize the greater power and superior growth of the NSDAP clearly and without doubt, he ceased his activity for the DSP and the Working Federation, and called on his adherents to join the NSDAP..." Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf





■ by Absolutely Nobama (1 hour and 15 minutes ago)



Johaely: Read the above post. You might learn something.





■ by Johaely (1 hour and 14 minutes ago)



It's pretty obvious what you are tyring to do. You are trying to pin every single bad thing on the left side of the spectrum. You, like Jonah Golberg, are trying to make it seem that liberalism=socialism=fascism and make your preffered political ideology (me-firstism or more accurately libertarian conservatism).





■ by Absolutely Nobama (50 minutes ago)



I'm simply stating facts. The Nazis were socialists. Mein Kampf only mentions the word fascist twice in 700 pages. I provided you three examples of how the Nazis are leftists, and you have yet to dispute any of them.





■ by Johaely (43 minutes ago)



No you haven't. You just followed the simplistic notion of socialist=leftist=evil. The nazi party was a nationalistic, corporatist, fascist party. (Just because Hitler mentions fascism twice in Mein Kamppf doesn't mean that the nazi party was not fascist.)



You are stupid, plain and simple. You live in your sanctimonous reality where everything your side does is good while everyhting hte other side does is therefore bad.



Last week you said "no liberals cannot define capitalism". I defined it and asked you define communism in objective. What did oyu do then? The most predictable thing. You defined communism as liberalism. Here is the s...t. Go back to freeperland or conservapedia where you crap would fly. Here you are just trolling. You aren't debating since you won't hear what the other side is saying and just deal .........



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------





....Blah, blah, blah.





No, your humble Right Wing Extremist Columnist wasn't being lazy by not correcting the numerous grammatical and spelling errors that litter the 2+2=5'ers' posts. I left them in for effect as a warning. These people are dumb enough to be dangerous. Luckily, their birth rate is low since they'd rather abort children rather than bring them into the world.



God help us all.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------







Hey! Check out this link before Sugar Daddy George Soros has it thrown in the nearest Memory Hole:





http://mediamatters.org/research/201012140033

1 comment:

Anonymous said...

Using "1984" graphics for a right-wing anti-Obama tangent is pathetic and once again sadly demonstrates the typical American naivety of politics and literature outside of the US. The book 1984 was written BY A SOCIALIST! George Orwell was a socialist AND opposed totalitarianism. And in addition to him being an anti-totalitarian socialist whose works are praised by people on the left and the right ... God, American politics and society is nothing but dualisms, good vs. evil, left vs. right, red state vs. blue state, white vs. black, liberty vs. tyranny. Your country needs to grow up, American politics sounds like a noisy kindergarten class!