Friday, December 31, 2010

Tormenting Liberals Is Fun, Indeed!

Once again, from the idiots who slavishly follow Media Matters:




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------









by Maimon (December 29, 2010 7:23 pm ET)



Remember George Orwell was a socialist. 1984 is about totalitarian governemnt like say: warantless searches..illusinary wars and enemies, saying you are fiscally responsible and blowing up the dept. You know republican government.



Liberals have generally ran more fiscally responsible government than conservatives. They have too, because conservative spend all the time: BushSr..Bush Jr..Reagan...



Liberals tax and spend on:education, social welfare of its citizens, healthcare reform,etc..



Conservative tax and spend on: military, private prison systems, failed weapons programs, private mercenary companies. You know things they own stock in ie. Carlyle Group, Lockheed, Gilead Pharma...



The only conservatives that didn't run deficits or were fiscally responsible were the ones that taxed.: Eisenhower, Nixon. And they were Progressives. They were driven out of the Republican party in recently. This is how they vote in such a tight block.



And newspeak and doublethink are very Frank Luntz..who is often paid for by the GOP.



You should look in the mirror Maxconrad..or should I say O'Brian from the Ministry of Love











• by kamrom (December 29, 2010 7:48 pm ET)



Sadly, you're wasting your effort. The people we are dealing with woudl probably think that 1984 WAS socialism, when of course socialism was the system in place which the party then corrupted, until it meant NOTHING it did before. This kinda of double-talk, while done constantly by the right, tends not to be understood by them. Its a lot like how there was once a group called Conservatives. Fiscal conservatives, generally. And now the group with that name has nothing to do wiht conservation, and is instead all about blaming democrats for the outrageous costs of two pointless wars.



◦ by Absolutely Nobama (December 30, 2010 1:01 am ET)



Please read Nineteen Eighty-Four before you comment on it.



■ by mescal (December 30, 2010 1:07 am ET)



Everybody here has read it. The difference between you and us is that we understood it.



■ by Absolutely Nobama (December 30, 2010 1:12 am ET)



Did you really ? I doubt it.



Nineteen Eighty-Four was a critique of big government. It was not, in any way, shape or form, an endorsement of socialism. In many ways, it mocks it. For example, one of the "crimes" Winston "confessed" to was being an admirer of capitalism.



■ by mescal (December 30, 2010 1:53 am ET)



You do know, don't you, that George Orwell was himself a proud socialist?



I'm kidding, of course. The odds of you knowing any historical facts are nearly nil.



And, by the way... I first read Nineteen Eighty-four was when I was sixteen, and was far more literate then than you demonstrate yourself to be now.



■ by Absolutely Nobama (December 30, 2010 2:55 am ET)



Instead of attempting to tell everyone how smart you supposedly are, why don't you respond to my last post ?



What point do you think Orwell was trying to make when Winston "confessed" to being an admirer of capitalism ?



C'mon, you can do it....go to wikipedia....that's it...



■ by mescal (December 30, 2010 4:00 am ET)



Nineteen Eighty Four was a dissecting of the horrors of Stalinistic totalitarianism, and not merely 'big government'. Orwell's point was not that the authoritarian government that he created was opposed to capitalism. It was that it could, through the use of applied terror, disinformation, and other ruthless forms of mind control, force the individual to say and to BELIEVE whatever it wanted him to believe. People were also forced to confess to practicing Goldsteinism, even though they hadn't a clue as to what Goldsteinism was.



It was about the attempted destruction of the human will and spirit. It was about conformism. It was about hatred raised to an art form. it was about authoritarianism mutating into a national psychosis.



Plucking one isolated little term out of this brilliant novel and citing that as definitive proof that Orwell's intention was to denounce liberalism is just plain vapid. All you did was show that you haven't a clue to what it's about.



Now, let's hear YOUR explanation about Orwell's support of socialism, and how that could POSSIBLY jibe with your anti-liberal screeds.



■ by Absolutely Nobama (December 30, 2010 4:24 am ET)



Lib Argument 765-A



Ignore what your eyes and common sense tell you. We know best.



■ by mescal (December 30, 2010 4:28 am ET)



In other words, you have no argument.



Time for you to declare victory and depart the field.



■ by Absolutely Nobama (December 30, 2010 10:45 pm ET)



Nope. Still waiting for your response.



■ by highlyunlikely (December 30, 2010 5:26 pm ET)



con argument #infinity: never let nuances interfere with your simple-minded world view.



■ by Absolutely Nobama (December 30, 2010 4:28 am ET)



It wasn't isolated at all. There was the mention that in order to survive, Oceanians had to go on the black market, every product was Victory Brand, etc.



I'm begging you. Read the book. Stop bleating out the usual lefty talking points.



■ by mescal (December 30, 2010 4:30 am ET)



I've read the book, fool.



Once again, the main difference between you and most of here is that we actually understood it.



■ by So Fain (December 30, 2010 8:40 am ET)



Wow. Orwell would indeed roll over in his grave at Nobama's interpretation of his work. Is there nothing that the right wing won't twist to support their pro-corporatist, pro-elite agenda?



■ by curiousindependent (December 30, 2010 12:53 pm ET)

7

The Bible, the Constitution, law, Dr. King, Malcolm X, and now 1984. I am sure that I have missed a lot, and that they are still working diligently to discover what else they can disinform about to make it seem either an indictment of Progressivism, or praise of Recidivism (the opposite of progressivism, for those wingnuts who have a hard time with big words), or both.



■ by SoloPocono (December 30, 2010 1:05 pm ET)

5

Right? And THIS-the complete alternate reality these wackos live in & defend-is even scarier when you realize they're "re-educating" their children into this hell.

Who needs critical thinking when you have your own "facts". "1984" on steroids.... :(





--------------------------------------------------------------------------------





Now, you didn't think I'd let these nimrods get away with inventing their own facts, do you ? Of course not! Keep reading, True Believer!





--------------------------------------------------------------------------------







by Maimon (December 30, 2010 11:24 pm ET)



I think Animal Farm was his anti-stalinist piece, but I agree with you entirely.



My reading of 1984 is more about how the state creates its own history, its own values , its own myths and its own language. The purpose of all this creation is to manufacture pliable citizens.



Winston is not "released" until he blieves the lies and O'Brian breaks him. BB does not kill people who go against it..it remakes them.



If you look at the following Pink Floyd albums the same themes can be found : Animals, Wish You Were Here, Dark Side of the Moon and The Wall.



Yeah....Stoner Trivia!!!









• by Absolutely Nobama (December 30, 2010 11:42 pm ET)



And guess what, you're wrong, too.



• by Maimon (December 30, 2010 11:16 pm ET)



LMAO..never said it was an endorsement of Socialism. I stated the writer was an ardent socialist. And he was.



Orwell wrote about broken promises like Stalinism and how it corrupted many of the socialist movements. Orwell was opposed to ANY form of Totalitarianism.



Doublethink and Newspeak is very GOP.



Orwell wrote about what he knew which was socialism...doesn't mean it does not apply to modern movement conservatism/ neoconservatism or paleoconservatism.



Much like Aldous Huxley in A Brave New World. The central ideas in both books are universal and not particular to any political movement.



And so you know,it is only our economy that is capitalistic. Our society is democratic. There is a great distinction between the two.



• by Maimon (December 30, 2010 4:35 pm ET)



lol...I have read 1984 many times. Just like I've read all of Orwell's works. Orwell was a socialist and a trade unionist. He actually served in a "trotskist" militia. He wrote 1984 as a response to ANY form of totalitarian regimes. Also he got paid to write Animal Farm by the British Government as piece of anti-Stalinist porpaganda. He hated Stalin for ruining the movement.



Newspeak and Doublethink are central neocon/movement conservative doctrines. The GOP uses guys like Frank Luntz to test palatability of phrases and concepts:



-estate tax= death tax

-dead civilians=collateral damage

-partial birth abortion is not a medical term

-etc..ad infinitum



The GOP tells you that they are fiscally responsible, but the reality is they have driven the debt and deficits. Doublethink



The GOP tells you they are tough on foreign affairs: Bush Sr. watched Saddam roll into Kuwait. Bush Jr had 9-11 and two wars that snuck up on him. Reagan missed the Hezbollah bombing of the Marine Corps barracks in Lebanon. Then Reagan armed the Mujahadin groups that eventually became the Taliban and Al-Queda. Did I mention he funded them through Pakistani ISI. Doublethink



The Lords of Illusion are masters of spin. One of them has a show called" The No Spin Zone" Doublethink







• by Absolutely Nobama (December 30, 2010 2:57 am ET)



Ingsoc....Newspeak for English Socialism.....



*sigh*



Do you libs read at all ?



by magnolialover (December 30, 2010 8:41 am ET)







Apparently, you don't.







by mattcable250650 (December 30, 2010 12:04 pm ET)



Well yes, you're free to spout such idiotic drively, but you look like kinda stupid when you're doing so..



I agree with your general assertion that reading and truly understanding are two different things, but you've given no reason to think that you have any better understanding of 1984 than we do (Yeah, I also read it back in my youth). If you want to prove that your understanding is better, you need to find and cite specific passages and show us that we're wrong. Simply asserting over and over that we're stupid and that you're smart means absolutely nothing.



• by magnolialover (December 30, 2010 1:34 pm ET)



This breakdown of 1984 will not fit on a bumper sticker, so, chances are good, he won't be providing any examples anytime soon.



◦ by Lord of Light (December 30, 2010 2:08 pm ET)



Indeed. Plus it's complex. When a right-winger sees complexity in issues like global warming or terrorism, the solution is always whatever requires no thinking -- in these cases, denial and a pretentious John Wayne pose (as long as the low-income they hate so much do the fighting), respectively.



■ by magnolialover (December 30, 2010 2:58 pm ET)

2

It is and can be complex. We saw what happens when they don't want to engage in something, they write things like, "YAWN.." and, "Are you done yet?"

• by Absolutely Nobama (December 30, 2010 11:41 pm ET)



You asked for it:



"Rutherford had once been a famous caricturist, whose brutal cartoons had helped inflame popular opinion before and during the Revolution. Even now, at long intervals, his cartoons were appearing in the Times. They were simply an imitation of his earlier manner, and curiously lifeless and unconvincing. Always they were a rehashing of the ancient themes--Slum tenements, starving children, street battles, CAPITALISTS IN TOP HATS [empahsis mine]--even on the barricades the CAPITALISTS [again, emphasis mine] still seemed to cling to their top hats-- an endless, hopeless effort to get back to the past."--George Orwell, Nineteen Eighty-Four



You'd think Rutherford worked for the Daily Kos, but no, he was a member of the Inner Party.





"But in among all this terrible poverty were just a few great big beautiful houses that were lived in by RICH [emphasis mine] men who had as many as thirty servants to look after them. These RICH [emphasis mine] men were called CAPITALISTS. [Emphasis mine] They were fat, ugly men with wicked faces, like the ones in the picture on the opposite page."-- George Orwell, Nineteen Eighty-Four



Despite how eerily similiar this is to a Frank Rich column in the New York Slimes, it's not. It's a quotation from the history text book that Winston borrowed from Mrs. Parsons. It was how INGSOC indoctrinated children, much the same way public schools indoctrinate children today. Since it's very obvious none of you actually read the book, INGSOC was the party of Big Brother, and hence the antagonist of the book.





Ah, but there's more:



"He [Winston] confessed that he was a religious believer, an admirer of CAPITALISM [empahsis mine], and a sexual pervert."-- George Orwell, Nineteen Eighty-Four



Freedom is the Freedom to say none of you actually read this book and you're a bunch of pompous blowhards.







--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Game. Set. Match. Just like when Reagan wiped the mat with Carter and Mondale.





http://mediamatters.org/blog/201012290003#1126105







(Just so you know: All grammatical and spelling errors were left in for effect.)

Wednesday, December 29, 2010

More From The Idiots At Media Matters

by Absolutely Nobama (December 28, 2010 8:17 am ET)




It's funny how you libs scream about "anti-Semitism" of Ann Coulter's little joke, yet demand that the Israelis do nothing to defend themselves from Palestinian aggression.



It's funny how you libs scream bloody murder about Ann Coulter, but say nothing about Barack Obama's association with Rashid Khalidi or Jeremiah Wright.



To any of my fellow Jews who are still liberals (and that number is becoming smaller by the second) : Wake up!



• by mary59 (December 28, 2010 9:41 am ET)



Very black and white thinker. And tribal, too, as if that was all that mattered.



Anyone who defends and likes what Ann Coulter has been spewing has some problems. Please get some help.



• by n'est-ce pas (December 28, 2010 10:04 am ET)



It's funny how you can't address a comment to anyone on this thread without either dehumanizing (you libs) them or misattributing positions or statements to them for the purpose of constructing your moldy straw men. Why don't you try debating the facts. Why don't you try engaging in a civil, logical, and factual manner? Is this beyond you? Do you think that flexing your muscles on the Internet is impressive? Because I find it more impressive when a commentor has the self-discipline and intellectual integrity to argue their point without indulging in childish name-calling and outright lies. But maybe I was just raised better than you were.



◦ by foghornleghorn (December 28, 2010 1:01 pm ET)



Why don't you try debating the facts. Why don't you try engaging in a civil, logical, and factual manner?



Facts have a liberal bias. And to the nutjobs, whoever repeats lies/talking points the loudest and longest wins the argument.



• by goonhee9633 (December 28, 2010 10:14 am ET)



What has Obama(not Reverend Wright or any of his other "associates") ever said or done that would indicate that he is anti-semitic or anti-Israel? Coulter's "little joke" came straight from the horseface's mouth.



◦ by Absolutely Nobama (December 28, 2010 10:34 am ET)



Didn't Obama ask the American people to judge him by the company he keeps ? Well, I think hanging around with someone like Rashid Khalidi makes one an anti-Semite.



■ by raddave43 (December 28, 2010 10:41 am ET)



No, he did not say to judge him by the company he keeps, or in the cases you mentioned KEPT.



■ by n'est-ce pas (December 28, 2010 11:11 am ET)

6

Now you're just flat out making stuff up? I would like very much for you to point to an actual Obama quote from an actual newspaper or television station in which the President of the United States said, "Judge me by the company I keep." Could you do that for me? Do you have it in you to debate like an adult?

Reply Report Abuse

■ by Absolutely Nobama (December 28, 2010 12:41 pm ET)



http://www.examiner.com/conservative-in-columbia/obama-judge-me-by-the-people-who-surround-me





















--------------------------------------------------------------------------------







As is our custom here at Absolutely Nobama, no spelling or punctuation corrections were made for effect.





But wait, there's more! These Progressivakians are a hardy bunch!







--------------------------------------------------------------------------------







by Johaely (December 21, 2010 3:58 pm ET)



Because always carrying a gun around you equals absolute protection. Of course that's true if you completely disregard factors such as the fatc that crimes normally occur by surprise, situations that involve gun use are extremely stressful, if legal citizens can get guns so can criminals, the gun-show loophole, the very small likelyhood of home invasions and the moral concerns regarding shooting another human being.



Though the last one i think doesn't worry you considering you are a sociopath.





--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Even I can't believe this one:





--------------------------------------------------------------------------------





I didn't know religion gave you the excuse to be a bigot...



• by Absolutely Nobama (December 21, 2010 9:54 am ET)



God's a bigot ?



"You shall not lie with a male as one lies with a female; it is an abomination."-- Leviticus 18:22



1 Cor. 6:9-10, "Or do you not know that the unrighteous shall not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived; neither fornicators, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor effeminate, nor homosexuals, nor thieves, nor the covetous, nor drunkards, nor revilers, nor swindlers, shall inherit the kingdom of God."





◦ by mookworthjwilson (December 21, 2010 10:01 am ET)

7

You do realize that god didn't actually write the bible right?



Do you eat shrimp? Do you make your wife go outside when she's menstruating? Do you eat pork? If you don't follow these rules you are not living by the word of god.



Personally I randomly picked another random book of historical fiction to live by. I live my life by "Johnny Tremain"



■ by soze169880 (December 21, 2010 10:24 am ET)

7

Do you make your wife go outside when she's menstruating?



HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA



■ by Johaely (December 21, 2010 10:28 am ET)



I'm withyou. There is no way this guy has a wife, or at least one that is not planning on calling the police on him one day (if she doesn't decide to take things on her hands).

■ by soze169880 (December 21, 2010 10:33 am ET)

7

He's also in violation of Levitical law if he shaves. Although I imagine he's probably in pretty good shape on that one too.



by rtwmd1230 (December 21, 2010 12:19 pm ET)





Yes, god is a bigot. Next question?





--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



For proof I didn't just imagine this:



http://mediamatters.org/research/201012200006





http://mediamatters.org/research/201012270002





God help us all....they might decide to multiply and allow their children to be born instead of aborting them! Yikes!

The Making Of A Raspberry Beret

Take a break from looking for black helicopters, fellow Extremists! It's short story time here at Absolutely Nobama!






--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



"Now, when Drill Instructor gives you the command, you will open your footlocker and break out your shower crap and and your shining crap. Port side shower up, starboard side shine 'em up. Ready....Move!"





The one thing Senior Drill Instructor Sergeant Brown hated was slow recruits. Slow recruits, if allowed to graduate, became slow Marines. If Sgt. Brown could say anything with 100% certainty after two tours in Iraq and one in Afghanistan, slow Marines were a danger to themselves and others in their platoon and slow Marines often became dead Marines.



"Move!Move!Move!Today!Today!Today! The last weirdthing not on line at the position of attention will regret the day of his birth and pray for a rapid death! Move! 10...9....8...4...2...1...Zero!"



"Freeze, recruit, freeze!" the dazed recruits screamed in unison. In reality, what Sgt. Brown asked the recruits to do in a span of twenty seconds was impossible and he knew it. That wasn't the point. Every little thing a drill instructor asks a recruit to do at Marine Recruit Depot, Parris Island, South Carolina teaches the prospective Marine how to handle the stress of combat. Everything is timed, from retrieving something from a footlocker to assembling an M-16. Slow Marines are dead Marines.



Sgt. Brown quickly scanned his charges to look for stragglers. Sure enough, he found five foot lockers left wide open, a recruit with only one shower shoe on, and a recruit unable to open his footlocker. Unlike the others who had the good sense to stop what they're doing when ordered, the recruit who couldn't open his foot locker kept right at it, giggling the lock in a desperate hope it would open.



"Brock!" roared Sgt. Brown. "Get up here! Front quarterdeck!"



"Recruit Brock," the recruits screamed in near unison (as much unison as First Phase recruits could muster, at any rate). "Report to Senior Drill Instructor Sergeant Brown as ordered, recruit!"



Recruit Brock immediatelty forgot about the lock and ran to the front of the squadbay, only to be met by Sgt. Brown halfway.



"Do we run in the squadbay, Brock ?! No! Why ? It's your home!" screamed Sgt. Brown as he got in the recruit's face. "When you're back on the block, smokin' and jokin', do you run inside of your momma's house?! Hell no you don't, weirdthing, 'cause she'll put you out with the rest of the trash! The squadbay is not a gymnasium, just like your Whiskey Tango trailor is not a gymnasium. Push!"



Recruit Brock immediately got into push up position.



"One..two...three..four...I love the Marine Corps!" screamed Recruit Brock as he struggled to do the push ups.



"The rest of the platoon can't hear you, Nancy. Sound off like you got a set!"



"ONE....TWO...THREE....FOUR! I LOVE THE MARINE....CORPS!"



As Recruit Brock continued his push ups, Sgt. Brown turned to the rest of the platoon.



"None of you ladies are motivating Recruit Brock! I think he needs to be shown how it's done. Get on your faces!"



The rest of Platoon 3064 followed orders and hit the deck in push up position. After several minutes, Sgt. Brown ordered the platoon to stop and the nightly routine began. Within an hour, the recruits were asleep.





* * *



A week later, Sgt. Brown was summoned to his company commander's office. He was a little excited. Recently, he had filed a request to rejoin his old unit in Afghanistan and perhaps his request was granted. Sgt Brown found it odd that they would pull him from the drill field while he was pushing a platoon, but the United States is at war, and war tends to wreck havoc on procedures.



"Sgt Brown reporting as ordered, sir."



"At ease, Sergeant. I don't know how to put this delicately, so I'm going to be direct. It has come to my attention that you have used homopobic slurs while addressing recruits. It has been alleged that you called a recruit, David Brock, 'Nancy' in front of the whole platoon. This is unacceptable. Be advised that you are hereby removed from the drill field until the matter is fully investigated. If this allegation is found to be true, you may be face additional discipline. Do you understand what I am telling you, Sergeant ?"





--------------------------------------------------------------------------------





Here come the Raspberry Berets, folks!

Sunday, December 26, 2010

The 2010 Cheesie Awards

Well, fellow Right Wing Extremists (in other words, anyone who has proven to be immune to the words "Hope and Change"), it's that time of year again. It's time for the 2010 Second Annual Edward Kennedy Memorial Government Cheese Awards, also known as the Cheesies. Without further ado---






--------------------------------------------------------------------------------





Our first Cheesie category is : Pieces of Plastic That Best Imitate Politicians....and the winners are...oh, this is weird...there are two winners! Rectal Itch McConnell and Gingerbread Man Boehner!



Without any regard to the results of the Midterm Massacre, the Gingerbread Man and the Itch folded their tents and agreed to the Not-So-Great Tax Compromise of 2010. In order to keep the Bush Tax Cuts around, the Itch and Gingerbread Man agreed to raise to the Death Tax from 0% to 35% and add on another 13 months of funemployment. Oh yes, these "Republican" leaders did a fine job indeed in helping Chairman Obama add another $900 Billion to the national debt. Cheesie worthy, to say the least!





--------------------------------------------------------------------------------





The second Cheesie category is : The Lamestream Media is Lame Indeed...and the winner is...the talentless hack known as Keith Olbermann!



Here's an award to put next to your next to your unearned Murrow, Keith! Night after night in 2010, Olbermann ranted and raved to his twelve viewers about how the evil FOX News was allowing its contributors and opinion show hosts to donate to political causes and candidates. For a fleeting microsecond, it looked like ol' Olby had a point--that is, until he himself was busted by PMSNBC management for doing the exact same thing by giving maximum allowable donations to Democrat Inner Party members Raul Grijalva and Jack Conway. Ahhhh...I love the smell of hypocrisy in the morning.....





--------------------------------------------------------------------------------





The third Cheesie category is: Most Ignored News Story By The Lamestream Media of 2010....and the winner is : The 10/2 One Nation Rally!



Since its inception, the Tea Party was considered a "dangerous", "racist", "extremist" group by the Lamestream Media. Every sign found at a Tea Party rally was carefully inspected for calls to overthrow the Big Mommy Regime in DC. Yet, when the Communist Party USA and the Democratic Socialists joined together with Chairman Obama's Organizing for America to throw the Stalinite Shindig of 10/2, one could hear only crickets instead of criticism from the Lamestream Media. In other words, as far as the Lamestreamers are concerned, communism is A-OK, fighting for God-given Constitutional rights is not. Journalism in the United States isn't just dead, it's Julius Caesar like dead.





--------------------------------------------------------------------------------





Finally, we here at Absolutely Nobama would like to give out the very first Cheesie Lifetime Achievement Award. Needless to say, the winner of this award will be instantly recognizable in all 57 states. He's the one he's been waiting for, the one who will bring "collective salvation to America"....Ladies and gentlemen, I give you Chairman Barack Hussein Obama!



In 2010, our racsally Dear Leader:

•gave his support to the 9/11 Victory Mosque.

•signed into law the mystery meat known as Obamacare(less).

•actually said in a speech:

"We’re not, we’re not trying to push financial reform because we begrudge success that’s fairly earned. I mean, I do think at a certain point you’ve made enough money. But, you know, part of the American way is, you know, you can just keep on making it if you’re providing a good product or providing good service. We don’t want people to stop, ah, fulfilling the core responsibilities of the financial system to help grow our economy".



•sent more troops to Haiti (10,000) to deal with the earthquake than to defend our southern border (1200).



•sent the exact number of troops to Haiti that he short changed General Stanley McChrystal in Afghanistan. (McChrystal asked for 40,000 and received 30,000 before his public firing.)



•lumped together small business owners barely earning $250,000 and billionaires with his initial refusal to continue the Bush Tax Cuts.

A socialist record for the ages indeed.





--------------------------------------------------------------------------------





God help us all.

Friday, December 24, 2010

Best Of Absolutely Nobama-- The National Association For The Advancement Of Communist Principles

Friday, July 30, 2010 (Original post date)



Recently, I've received some heat from the NAACP for calling them the "National Association for the Advancement Communist Principles". In fact, the NAACP even has some of their drones stalking me on the mirco-blogging phenomenon known as Twitter. I've been called a racist, a redneck, a dangerous extremist, yadda, yadda, yadda. (It's getting dull, really.)



No matter what they say or what they do, I stand by my statement. The NAACP could care less about helping minorities. They're just another group of leftists bent on redistributing wealth and turning the United States into a European- style socialist rat hole. Unlike the talentless Human Rat Keith Olbermann, I don't just rant to hear myself rant. I provide facts.





Here's former NAACP head comrade Julian Bond in 1999, BCO (Before Chairman Obama):





--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



"We want [the NAACP] to be a social justice organization....our mission is to fight racial discrimination and provide social justice. We deal with the beast itself. There are many organizations that provide social services. We say, 'Good for them.' But we are one of the very few that provide social justice. It is popular to say we are in a post-civil rights period, but we don't believe that."





--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Ah....but what is "social justice" ? (If you're a Glenn Beck junkie like me, you already know the answer because you wear the Official Glenn Beck Tinfoil Hat, available at Insider Extreme!)



From the Right Wing Bomb Throwers at Wikipedia:





--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Social justice is based on the concepts of human rights and equality and involves a greater degree of economic egalitarianism through progressive taxation, income redistribution, or even property redistribution. These policies aim to achieve what developmental economists refer to as more equality of opportunity than may currently exist in some societies, and to manufacture equality of outcome in cases where incidental inequalities appear in a procedurally just system.





--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Hmm....Who else talks about income redistribution ? Property redistribution ? Well, there's Chairman Obama and his 2+2=5 Progressivevik Junta in Congress, but let's face it, they're about as original as a sitcom that has a wise wife, a moron husband, and smart alecky kids. If any of them had an original thought, they would go catatonic. Where did such ideas come from ?





--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



"From each according to his ability to each according to his needs." -- Karl Marx



"The theory of communism may be summed up in one sentence: Abolish all private property." --Karl Marx







--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



Now, I'm not going to pretend to have a PHD in political science. I'm going to use a little thing called "common sense". Here it comes! Here's my proof that the NAACP is really the National Association for the Advancement of Communist Principles. Ready ?





IF IT WALKS LIKE A DUCK, QUACKS LIKE A DUCK, IT MUST BE A DUCK.





As we can see, the whole idea of "social justice" is nothing more than Marxism with a kinder title. If you'll notice, in the above definition of "social justice", the word "voluntary" is absent. Redistribution of wealth and property are only possible by the use of force. If you don't believe me, ask any Russian, Chinese, or Cuban immigrant over the age of 40. They'll tell you point blank that "social justice" is not divinely inspired as Chairman Obama's pal, the Sinister Minister, Jim Wallis, would have you believe. It's about using the power of the state to control. If the NAACP is not a communist organization, why would they advocate for "social justice" ? That brings me to my next pearl of wisdom that will also prove that the NAACP is part of the New Red Menace. Ready ? Here we go!





WHERE THERE'S SMOKE, THERE'S A FIRE.





To that, I say--





God help us all.







Sources:



Stupid Black Men by Larry Elder (A little tidbit for all the Progressiveviks who are going to call me a racist for reading this book: Larry Elder happens to black. He also happens to be one of the best authors I've ever read. By all means, read this book.)



Wikipedia.com



Brainyquote.com

Thursday, December 16, 2010

If You Put A Liberal's Brain In A Bird....

.....The bird would fly backwards.






Need proof other than the fraud that is Chairman Obama and his economic policy ? Check out this conversation I had on Media Matters :







--------------------------------------------------------------------------------





• by Absolutely Nobama (December 15, 2010 1:06 pm ET)



Being a socialist is nothing to be proud of.





After all, Nazi is short for National SOCIALIST German Workers Party.



◦ by foghornleghorn (December 15, 2010 1:13 pm ET)



I'm a socialist as well. The Nazis were not socialists.



You apparently believe that just because the word socialist is in their name then they have to be socialists.



You're a simpleton.



■ by Absolutely Nobama (December 15, 2010 1:25 pm ET)



From The Nazi Party Platform, 1920



"We demand that the state be charged first with providing the opportunity for a livelyhood and a way of life for the citizens."



That's not exactly right wing propaganda, now is it?





■ by Absolutely Nobama (December 15, 2010 1:31 pm ET)



"We must put an end to both economic freeloading and economic exploitation in America. There must be no place for parasites who draw their sustenance from society without giving anything in return. Those who thrive on usury, speculation, money-manipulation, and monopoly form a special class today whose primary interest is the maintenance of the system which allows their form of parasitism to flourish in the first place. We must have an economy based on the long-term interests of the man who works for a living, not the chronic loafer or the man who lives by renting out his capital."





■ by Absolutely Nobama (December 15, 2010 1:36 pm ET)



Guess where I got that from ?





http://www.americannaziparty.com/rockwell/materials/articles/stand.php



Yeah, more right wing propaganda. Idiot.





■ by congero6189599 (December 15, 2010 1:58 pm ET)



Yea and I remember all the Neo-Nazi's marching with Martin Luther King for civil rights. You dummy what Rockwell was attacking were the "Jews."

"

Hitler wasn't talking about "all" the people just the fairytale "master white Aryans race." The NAZI's weren't socialist they were fascist owned and financed by national and international finance capital. The first thing Hitler did was arrest and kill the communist,socialist and trade unionist. Infact his attacks and rhetoric closely resemble yours and every other conservative at this site. Attacks on unions,attacks on so-called socialist and communist. You are living proof of the 7 fools analogy I made above and you call someone else an idiot after making such studpic statements? Amazing!





■ by Absolutely Nobama (December 15, 2010 11:07 pm ET)

1

In the 700 pages of Mein Kampf, the word fascist is only used twice. Why don't you libs actually read books before commenting on them ?





■ by Absolutely Nobama (1 hour and 19 minutes ago)



Where does the word "Jew" appear in the above post, lackwit ?





■ by foghornleghorn (December 15, 2010 1:39 pm ET)



Nice to see you can use teh google.



The Nazis were FASCISTS, not socialists.









■ by Absolutely Nobama (December 15, 2010 1:43 pm ET)



Fascism and socialism are the same thing. Both hold the state as supreme, not the individual.



Still no remarks on the proof I have provided you not once, but twice ?





■ by congero6189599 (December 15, 2010 2:03 pm ET)

4 1

Fascism and socialism are the same? Wow! The stupid on this one is amazing!





■ by RedandWhite Guerilla (December 15, 2010 3:13 pm ET)



Nazis and Socialist kind of killed each other in the Second World War, in droves I might add. I was freaken enemy #1 Stalin who practically won the war for us.



Now how do two ideologies, that are so close to one another, go about committing acts of genocide on one another? Doesn't work does it?





■ by Absolutely Nobama (December 15, 2010 11:19 pm ET)



Where does it say socialists can't kill each other ? No, your murdering hero did not win WWII for the US, Hitler was too stupid to take Moscow when he had the chance.



Reread the last two posts I made. They come straight from the horses' mouths, the Nazis themselves.





■ by Johaely (December 15, 2010 1:53 pm ET)



Hey dumba$$, when did Hitler rise to power in the nazi party?





■ by Absolutely Nobama (December 15, 2010 11:11 pm ET)



What does that have to do with anything ?





■ by Johaely (1 hour and 53 minutes ago)



Everything. You seem to beleive that the national socialist party was the same that it was before Hitler took the reigns and turned it into what it is known now. He joined the party as an infiltrator. He was in no way a socialist considering he also exterminated anyone who was member of a union, communist or socialist.



Does being so damn simple minded hurt? Can you make a nuanced though, like ever?





■ by Absolutely Nobama (1 hour and 45 minutes ago)



Uneducated Twit: The Nazi Party was barely a blip on the radar screen when Hitler joined. He was the 55th member.



Please read a book. I promise it won't hurt.





■ by Johaely (1 hour and 23 minutes ago)



You really did not read what you wrote. You know, people living in glass houses shouldn't be throwing stones.





■ by Absolutely Nobama (1 hour and 17 minutes ago)



Did you or did you not read the last post ?





■ by Johaely (1 hour and 5 minutes ago)



Uneducated Twit: The Nazi Party was barely a blip on the radar screen when Hitler joined. He was the 55th member.





I'll admit i messed up the chonology but what you are doing is still disingenous. The Nazi party had nationalistic leanings (don't you idiots accuse anybody to the left of you of being unpatriotic?). Even though it beleived in profit sharing, it did so through corporatism rather than communatiarism. It was at most socialist in idea only. It also despised the traditional socialists, the egalitarian ones, and communists. To try to lump them together is just malicious ignorance.

Reply Report Abuse



■ by Absolutely Nobama (46 minutes ago)



And in practice. The Nazis were socialists.





■ by Johaely (38 minutes ago)



In practice they were fascists.



Let's see wikipedia's definition for socialism:





Socialism is an economic and political theory advocating public or common ownership and cooperative management of the means of production and allocation of resources. A socialist society is characterised by a free association, which is not based on coercive wage labour. It is organized on the basis of relatively equal power relations, self-management, collective decision-making and adhocracy rather than hierarchical, bureaucratic forms of organization in the economic and political systems.









And now Nazism:





Nazism (Nationalsozialismus, National Socialism; alternatively spelled Naziism[1]) was the ideology and practice of the Nazi Party and of Nazi Germany.[2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9] It was a unique variety of fascism that involved biological racism and antisemitism.[10] Nazism presented itself as politically syncretic, incorporating policies, tactics and philosophies from right- and left-wing ideologies; in practice, Nazism was a far right form of politics.[11]



The Nazis believed in the supremacy of an Aryan master race and claimed that Germans represent the most pure Aryan nation.[12] They argued that Germany's survival as a modern great nation required it to create a New Order รข€” an empire in Europe that would give the German nation the necessary land mass, resources, and expansion of population needed to be able to economically and militarily compete with other powers.[13]



The Nazis claimed that Jews were the greatest threat to the Aryan race and the German nation. They considered Jews a parasitic race that attached itself to various ideologies and movements to secure its self-preservation, such as: the Enlightenment, liberalism, democracy, parliamentary politics, capitalism, industrialisation, Marxism and trade unionism.[14]









If anything nazism was its own branch of beleif.



■ by Absolutely Nobama (1 hour and 24 minutes ago)



"The NSDAP [The Nazis] and the DSP [The German Socialist Party] had arisen with the SAME ULTIMATE AIMS [emphasis mine], yet absolutely independent of each other. The main fighter for the DSP, as I have said, was Julius Streicher. At first he, too, had a holy conviction of the mission and the future of his movement. But as soon he could recognize the greater power and superior growth of the NSDAP clearly and without doubt, he ceased his activity for the DSP and the Working Federation, and called on his adherents to join the NSDAP..." Adolf Hitler, Mein Kampf





■ by Absolutely Nobama (1 hour and 15 minutes ago)



Johaely: Read the above post. You might learn something.





■ by Johaely (1 hour and 14 minutes ago)



It's pretty obvious what you are tyring to do. You are trying to pin every single bad thing on the left side of the spectrum. You, like Jonah Golberg, are trying to make it seem that liberalism=socialism=fascism and make your preffered political ideology (me-firstism or more accurately libertarian conservatism).





■ by Absolutely Nobama (50 minutes ago)



I'm simply stating facts. The Nazis were socialists. Mein Kampf only mentions the word fascist twice in 700 pages. I provided you three examples of how the Nazis are leftists, and you have yet to dispute any of them.





■ by Johaely (43 minutes ago)



No you haven't. You just followed the simplistic notion of socialist=leftist=evil. The nazi party was a nationalistic, corporatist, fascist party. (Just because Hitler mentions fascism twice in Mein Kamppf doesn't mean that the nazi party was not fascist.)



You are stupid, plain and simple. You live in your sanctimonous reality where everything your side does is good while everyhting hte other side does is therefore bad.



Last week you said "no liberals cannot define capitalism". I defined it and asked you define communism in objective. What did oyu do then? The most predictable thing. You defined communism as liberalism. Here is the s...t. Go back to freeperland or conservapedia where you crap would fly. Here you are just trolling. You aren't debating since you won't hear what the other side is saying and just deal .........



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------





....Blah, blah, blah.





No, your humble Right Wing Extremist Columnist wasn't being lazy by not correcting the numerous grammatical and spelling errors that litter the 2+2=5'ers' posts. I left them in for effect as a warning. These people are dumb enough to be dangerous. Luckily, their birth rate is low since they'd rather abort children rather than bring them into the world.



God help us all.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------







Hey! Check out this link before Sugar Daddy George Soros has it thrown in the nearest Memory Hole:





http://mediamatters.org/research/201012140033

Tuesday, December 14, 2010

Freedom Is The Freedom To Say.....

"Freedom is the freedom to say that two plus two makes four. If that is granted, all else follows." -- George Orwell, Ninteen Eighty-Four







--------------------------------------------------------------------------------





Ok. Fine. You asked for it, George.





THE TAX DEAL HAMMERED OUT BY MITCH MCCONNELL AND JOHN BOEHNER WITH CHAIRMAN OBAMA SUCKS. I THINK MCCONNELL AND BOEHNER SHOULD BE STRIPPED OF THEIR LEADERSHIP POSITIONS.





There are many reasons why I left the Republican Panty. The first nail in the coffin was John McPain being named the Republican nominee for the '08 Popularity Contest. The second nail in the coffin was George Bush's ugly baby, TARP. The third nail in the coffin was the wet tissue paper-like defense of Conservatism by the Republican Panty during the '08 Popularity Contest. The final nail in the coffin came during those dark days of January 2009 when almost every Republican in office fell over themselves attempting to rebrand themselves as "Obama Republicans". (I still scream "Get a room!" at the top of my lungs whenever I see that photo of Florida governor Charlie Crist hugging Obama the Redeemer.)



All of the above were painful for me as a Right Wing Extremist to put up with, but the main factor that caused me to turn in my Republican Decoder Ring was the fact that the Republican Panty is run by wimps who aren't very bright. [Politically Incorrect Joke Alert! Get ready, Media Matters!] In fact, if you threw a dress on half of them, you'd have a bunch of lib Democrats. Nowhere else is this more evident than the Not-So-Great-Tax-Compromise of 2010.



Let's face it: It wasn't Obama who lost this debate. It was Rectal Itch McConnell and Gingerbread Man Boehner who lost the debate regardless of what FOX News and the Professional Left thinks. In order not to have taxes raised, McConnell and Boehner agreed to to reinstate the Death Tax at 35% (!) or 55% (if people like Schmuckie Schumer have their way) (!!), 13 months of additional unemployment compensation as if 99 weeks wasn't enough, and, oh yes, allowed another 800 billion smackers to be added to the federal deficit.



Call me crazy and off my meds, but this isn't exactly tearing a page out of the Barry Goldwater playbook.



What Boehner and the Itch should have done is wait out Chairman Obama. They still had the momentum of the Midterm Massacre. They had Chairman Obama on the ropes and they should have kept it up. Obama was in no position whatsoever to allow the Bush Tax Cuts to expire, no matter how much his tatooed, wallet chain wearing base whined on message boards. Chairman Obama may have the economic savvy of a meth addict, but even he sees the handwriting on the Berlin Wall. The Stimulus Slush Fund, with its turtle tunnels and fish ladders, failed to produce jobs. (Shocking, I know.) Despite the best efforts of Andy Griffith, Obamacare(less) is as still as popular as the fat kid with acne at the prom. There was no way on God's green, and not to mention getting cooler by the second, earth Obama was going to have a tax increase hung around his neck like an albatross. Boehner and the Itch could have had another slurpee while waiting for Obama to come crawling on his hands and knees begging for help.



Another thing the Boehner and the Itch could have done is demand that the 13 months of funemployment should have been taken out of what's left of the unpissed away Stimulus funds. Most Democrats wouldn't have cared. After all, they've been pretending for months now that it never happened and this would be a "Get Out of Jail Free" card for them. Would that have brought down the deficit ? No, but at least it wouldn't have added to it.



*SIGH*



Freedom is the Freedom to say our government is run by congenital morons.





God help us all.

Sunday, December 12, 2010

Stupid Is As Government Does

You really have to hand it to our Washington Oppressors. When you think they can't be anymore incompetent, they pull yet another dead rabit out of Uncle Sam's tattered top hat.




Needless to say, I'm not exactly a fan of the Not So Great Tax Compromise of 2010. Once again, the Democrat party has proven that its motto is: "From Each According To His Abilities To Each According to His Needs". Once again, the Republican party has proven their motto is: "Thank you, sir. Can I have another ?" Really, this fiasco proves the soon to be famous adage true: Stupid is As Government Does.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------





Reason #1 This Is A Great Example of Stupid is As Government Does: It's going to take a hell of lot more than extending the Bush Tax Cuts to jump start the economy.





Don't get me wrong: I'm glad that the taxes of small business owners will remain stable for at least two years. Regardless of what the Professional Left and its leaders like the untalented Keith Olbermann think, this will keep some us Proles from getting canned. However, the economy will not and can not grow with medium to large businesses paying 35% of their income to the Big Stupid Animal known as government. The Republican Panty (No, that's not a typo.) should have fought for an actual, breathing, cut. Another problem is the fact that the extension of the Bush Tax Cuts is that it has an expiration date. Any temporary momentum the economy receives from this will evaoporate in two years, possibly setting off another recession as the Mental Midgets on The Hill cause all kinds of chaos over the battle to keep them going during a Presidential election. At very best, this is a push. A push onto the train heading toward Economic Armageddon.





--------------------------------------------------------------------------------





Reason #2 This Is A Great Example of Stupid is As Government Does: How on God's green, and not to mention cooling, earth are the additional 13 months of unemployment going to be paid for ?



As if anyone needed further proof that crystal meth addicts have better spending habits than Chairman Obama, the Not So Great Compromise also provides an additional 13 months of unemployment compensation. In other words, unemployment has now turned into welfare. Of course, there's no game plan to actually pay for this, like taking the 120 billion this government largesse will cost out of unused Stimulus funds, for example. Oh no. Apparently, our Dear Leader has decided once again to wing it. (In other words, print the money or borrow it from the loan shark known as China.) Even the tax hike that Benedict McConnell and John Arnold (the Estate Tax) agreed to won't pay for it, so exactly where is this money coming from ? Where ? Where ? Where ?



Our pockets, when all of the Bush Tax Cuts expire for good, probably.





--------------------------------------------------------------------------------





Stupid is as government does....to that I say:



God help us all.

My Stint As An Editor At The New York Slimes

Do the overhyped and overpaid coulmnists at the New York Times have editors ? Do they have someone who says "Let's back that up with some facts, Krugman" ? Do they have someone to say "Ann Coulter is right! Frank Rich really is a woman trapped in a man's body" ? Most importantly, do they have someone who says "Maureen! You're an opinion journalist, not a middle age cheerleader for the Democrat Party" ?




They do now. That person is moi, your Friendly Neighborhood Right Wing Extremist. Below is a column by Maureen Dowd, edited by yours truly. This is what her editor should have told her, instead of "You are wonderful, Maureen! No, I don't see any grey roots! Yes, I'll pick your order at Zabar's right away!"





--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
(From the NY Times, "Republican Party Time" by Maureen Dowd)




Talk about fired up and ready to go.



At a Republican victory party suffused with vengeful glee, the man who body-surfed the anti-establishment wave to become the next Speaker of the House was looking very establishment. [Rewrite this. What about all of Obama's "We won the election rhetoric" ?]



Even though it was predicted, it was still a shock to see the voters [This sentence doesn't make sense, Maureen. Rewrite it.] humiliate a brilliant and spellbinding young president, who’d had such a Kennedy-like beginning, [No. Kennedy didn't have anyone chanting slogans that originated in the Communist Party.] while electing a lot of conservative nuts [There are no liberal nuts ? What would you call Dennis Kucininch ? Rewrite.] and promoting this central-casting congressman as the face of the future: a Republican who had vowed in a written pledge to restore America to old-fashioned values, returning to a gauzy “Leave It to Beaver” image that never existed even on the set of “Leave It to Beaver.” [ Brilliant ? This is the same the same guy who said he's visited 57 states on the campaign trail!]

Republicans outcommunicated a silver-tongued president who was supposed to be Ronald Reagan’s heir in the communications department. [Delete this. Ronald Reagan actually meant what he said. This guy has a teleprompter at staff meetings, for God's sake.]



They were able to persuade a lot of Americans that the couple in the White House was not American enough, not quite “normal,” too Communist, too radical, too Great Society. All that Ivy League schooling had made them think they knew better than average American folks, not to mention the founding fathers. [The American people didn't need a whole lot of convincing. Let's be realistic, here.]



The Speaker-in-waiting sounded the alarm: the elites in the White House were snuffing out the America he grew up in. It only took two years to realize that their direction for the country was simply, as he put it, “a contradiction with the vast majority of Americans.”



No one gets to take America away from Americans — not even the American president! [Maureen, whether you like it or not, we do have a Constitution. In that document, the President is not granted the power to take over car manufacturers, the US health care system, banks, or any other private entity. Are you sure you took civics in high school ?]



“What the American people were saying is ‘Enough!’ ” the Speaker-to-be told me, as he savored his own win and his party’s landslide, which he said was “a historical tide, not just a partisan election.”



Washington had not been listening. Washington had been scorning the deepest beliefs of Americans. And now that would have to change.



“American people are clearly fed up with what they see as the decay of American society,” he declared.



The new leader of the House took a more black-and-white approach than the nuanced president. It’s enshrined in the Declaration of Independence that you need the consent of the governed and the governed did not consent.



Ascending to third in the line of succession for the presidency: a working-class kid who rose in the House as a rabble-rouser willing to throw bombs to score points against powerful Democrats. [Rewrite! Are you trying to say Nancy Pelosi was not a bomb thrower ?]



Now he’d be helping to run the country, saving it from what he regarded as an arrogant and out-of-touch clique of elites.



In the revolutionary flush of the electoral map glowing red, he was floating, working hard to avoid gloating (even though Sean Hannity was around, gloating about the pain about to befall the Democratic president). [And the press didn't cheer on Election Night '08 ?]



But he could not resist taking a few jabs at the “liberal media elite” distorting things, and a few more at a puffed-up White House that got punished for not paying enough attention to people’s anxieties. [What in the hell did he distort, Maureen ? Did you not open this column by sininging hosannas to Obama the Redeemer and his supposed brilliance ? Do you even read what you write ?]



“They had an enormous opportunity to bring about change and they failed, and I don’t say that harshly,” he said, adding: “They really are left-wing elitists and they really thought the country didn’t get it, and, therefore, it was their job to give the country the government that they thought the country needed, even if they didn’t want it. That’s the whole history of the health plan.”



There was a lot of talk, as in the campaign, about the misbegotten health care plan, about balancing the budget, about lowering the deficit and taxes, about doing something on abortion and bloated government. Meanwhile, bloated fat-cat lobbyists were dancing down K Street. [Facts or examples would be nice, here. Add examples or delete.]



The next Speaker felt that the humbled president should take the election as a cue to be conciliatory, and he proposed they talk in the next few days. He offered to reach out to Democrats who wanted to work with his side, but also noted that the president would not be wise to stand in the way of the conservative agenda. [Rewrite! The guy is not Tony Soprano!]



“I prefer to believe that this president, who is clearly very smart, is quite capable of thinking clearly about a message sent by the American people,” he said.



He said that, contrary to what the media elite had been jabbering about, he would not use his subpoena power to rain down a series of investigations on the Democratic administration.



No “witch hunts,” he said. Only “legitimate” investigations. [Lose the quotes around "legitimate". Actual crimes have been committed, like the Romanoff and Sestak bribes to quit their races, who knew what when during the Blagojevich mess, and God knows what else.]



Yeah, that all worked out for Newt Gingrich. He really came through. The quotes above came from Gingrich, when I covered his heady victory in Marietta, Ga., in the 1994 Republican landslide that made him Speaker.



And, obviously, the Republican House only pursued “legitimate” investigations of Bill Clinton. Sixteen years later, as a weeping John Boehner extolled the American values he learned at his father’s bar — in the moment he dethroned Nancy Pelosi — the new crop of anarchic [Anarchic? What Conservative has called for the end of government ?] conservatives are saying all the same things.



God help the Republic. And, Mr. Speaker, in the immortal words of Sharron Angle, man up!







[See me in my office. We have a lot discuss. With what we pay you, we expect much, much more.]

Monday, December 6, 2010

Progressivevik Hate On Display For All To See

There are a lot of things to loathe the 2+2=5 Authoritarian Left for. They are, to tear a page out of Mark Levin's playbook, detestable.




Whoa. A little harsh, don'tcha think ?



Not at all. When they're not reaching into your wallet to pay for another one of their "From Each According To Their Abilities To Each According To Their Needs" social programs that invariably end up bankrupt, they spew hatred while telling you how racist you are. I'm sick of it, and judging by last month's Midterm Massacre, so is the rest of America.



However, memories fade. Let me remind you, America of what you're up against if you ever allow the Progressiveviks to take total power ever again, or influence our popular culture. Let me remind you what the Progressiveviks really think of us Proles. Let me put Progressivevik hate on display for all to see.





--------------------------------------------------------------------------------





"Does it constitute child abuse to lead children in the way of religion ?" --Carl Strock, columnist no one has ever heard of.



"When doctors pronounced Rev. Jerry Laymon Falwell Sr., dead at 12:40 EST Tuesday...My first thoughts were not what to say or write. In fact, my very first thought upon hearing of Reverend Falwell's passing was: Good. And I didn't mean "good" in a oh-good-he's-gone-home-to-be-with-the-Lord kind of way. I meant "good" as in Ding-dong the witch is dead."--Cathleen Falsani, columnist no one cares about, not even her own mother.



"This dumb, dumb country believes in demons and some creature with horns and a tail and a pitchfork who's going to make you burn in a mythical place if you don't believe in an imaginary friend." --Bill Maher, talk show host with rapidly falling ratings"



"I would want to see the American get shot. It's the other guy's country. [referring to American troops in Vietnam]" --Arthur "Pinch" Sulzberger, publisher of the New York Slimes



"We will not stand by and allow them to move this brother so that some white interloper can expand his business." --the ever quotable Al Sharpton, during the Freddy's Fashion Mart affair



"I am not disturbed by Ronald Reagan's Alzheimer's. You know, there's not a lot of cleaner pictures of karma in the world." --crappy actor Sean Penn



"George Bush is a fucking idiot." -- Jennifer Aniston, aging actress and slut



"Bush is a cheap thug." --elevator musician John Mellencamp



"My daughter, who goes to Stuyvesant High School only blocks away from the World Trade Center thinks we should fly an American flag outside our window. Definitely not, I say: the flag stands for jingoism and vengeance and war." -- Katha Pollitt, boring and unoriginal columnist for the Nation (Out of curiosity, shouldn't we just call that rag the National Socialist ? Truth in advertising, right ?)



"Colin Powell is committed into come into the house of the master, as long he would serve the master, according to the master's purpose." --Harry Belafonte, washed up singer and communist activist



"If there was a better, more effective, or in fact any other way of visiting some penalty befitting the little Eichmanns inhabiting the sterile sanctuary of the [World Trade Center], I'd really be interested in hearing about it." -- plagarizing academic Ward Churchill. (For those of you who were educationally abused by our public school system, Churchill is referring to Adolf Eichmann who masterminded the Holocaust. Yes, you read that right. This chunk of fecal matter compared the victims of 9/11 to the Nazis. You betcha. He's a total asshole.)



"I noticed that some of the later D&E's were very easy. So I asked myself why can't they all happen this way. You see [with] the easy ones...you'd reach up and grab the foot of the fetus, pull the fetus down and the head would hang up and then you would collapse the head and take it out." --the American Joseph Mengele, "Dr." Martin Haskell, inventor of partial birth abortions, bragging how easy it is to murder an innocent baby. Hey, Ward Churchill! If you want a real "little Eichmann", why not look the good "doctor" up and have coffee ?



"Not me. I think he ought to be worried about what's in the Good Lord's mind, because if there is retributive justice, he'll get AIDS from a transfusion, or one of grandchildren will get it." -- Nina Totenberg, Nazi Propaganda Radio (NPR) host on Senator Jesse Helms. Not beat dead horse and get PETA all mad at me, but why wasn't Totenberg canned for saying this ? Sue the crap out of them, Juan Williams! Sue the crap out of them!



"You know, I hope his wife feeds him lots of eggs and butter and he dies early like many black men do, of heart disease. Well, that's how I feel. He is an absoutely reprehensible person." --Julianne Malveaux, USA Today columnist on Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas. I think she's the reprehensible one, don't you ?







--------------------------------------------------------------------------------





And, now, on to our elected leaders, past and present.





--------------------------------------------------------------------------------





"But she is a typical white person who, if she sees somebody on the street that she doesn't know, there's a reaction that's been bred into our experiences that don't go away, and that sometimes comes out in the wrong way, and that's just the nature of race in our society."-- Chairman Obama, the "post-racial" President, throwing his own grandmother under the bus.





"You cannot go to a 7-11 or a Dunkin' Donuts unless you have a slight Indian accent.... I'm not joking."-- Vice President Joe Bite Me. Yes, Joe it is a "big fucking deal" when you make ignorant comments like this public. Dirtbag.





"Segregation is not humiliating but a benefit." --Woodrow Wilson, The First American Dictator. It should also be noted that this Patron Saint of Progressivism segregated th US military.







--------------------------------------------------------------------------------





However, nothing, and I do mean nothing was as ugly as this gem from Franklin Delano Roosevelt:





--------------------------------------------------------------------------------





--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Executive Order No. 9066

The President



Executive Order



Authorizing the Secretary of War to Prescribe Military Areas



Whereas the successful prosecution of the war requires every possible protection against espionage and against sabotage to national-defense material, national-defense premises, and national-defense utilities as defined in Section 4, Act of April 20, 1918, 40 Stat. 533, as amended by the Act of November 30, 1940, 54 Stat. 1220, and the Act of August 21, 1941, 55 Stat. 655 (U.S.C., Title 50, Sec. 104);



Now, therefore, by virtue of the authority vested in me as President of the United States, and Commander in Chief of the Army and Navy, I hereby authorize and direct the Secretary of War, and the Military Commanders whom he may from time to time designate, whenever he or any designated Commander deems such action necessary or desirable, to prescribe military areas in such places and of such extent as he or the appropriate Military Commander may determine, from which any or all persons may be excluded, and with respect to which, the right of any person to enter, remain in, or leave shall be subject to whatever restrictions the Secretary of War or the appropriate Military Commander may impose in his discretion. The Secretary of War is hereby authorized to provide for residents of any such area who are excluded therefrom, such transportation, food, shelter, and other accommodations as may be necessary, in the judgment of the Secretary of War or the said Military Commander, and until other arrangements are made, to accomplish the purpose of this order. The designation of military areas in any region or locality shall supersede designations of prohibited and restricted areas by the Attorney General under the Proclamations of December 7 and 8, 1941, and shall supersede the responsibility and authority of the Attorney General under the said Proclamations in respect of such prohibited and restricted areas.



I hereby further authorize and direct the Secretary of War and the said Military Commanders to take such other steps as he or the appropriate Military Commander may deem advisable to enforce compliance with the restrictions applicable to each Military area hereinabove authorized to be designated, including the use of Federal troops and other Federal Agencies, with authority to accept assistance of state and local agencies.



I hereby further authorize and direct all Executive Departments, independent establishments and other Federal Agencies, to assist the Secretary of War or the said Military Commanders in carrying out this Executive Order, including the furnishing of medical aid, hospitalization, food, clothing, transportation, use of land, shelter, and other supplies, equipment, utilities, facilities, and services.



This order shall not be construed as modifying or limiting in any way the authority heretofore granted under Executive Order No. 8972, dated December 12, 1941, nor shall it be construed as limiting or modifying the duty and responsibility of the Federal Bureau of Investigation, with respect to the investigation of alleged acts of sabotage or the duty and responsibility of the Attorney General and the Department of Justice under the Proclamations of December 7 and 8, 1941, prescribing regulations for the conduct and control of alien enemies, except as such duty and responsibility is superseded by the designation of military areas hereunder.



Franklin D. Roosevelt



The White House,



February 19, 1942.



[F.R. Doc. 42–1563; Filed, February 21, 1942; 12:51 p.m.]









--------------------------------------------------------------------------------







Yup. This is the executive order that sent Americans of Japanese, German, and Italian descent into concentra...I mean...internment camps during World War II. Is it my imagination, or is Franklin Dictator Roosevelt still one of the darlings of the Left ?





Don't forget, America.



Don't ever forget what monsters make up the American Left. Don't forget how close we are to fascism.



God help us all.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------





Sources:



Losing Our Religion by SE Cupp



Liberal Fascism by Jonah Goldberg



100 People Who Are Screwing Up America by Bernard Goldberg



Bias by Bernard Goldberg

Thursday, December 2, 2010

Progressivevik Hypocrisy Alert!

From the silly gooses at the HuffingtonandPuffington Post:








--------------------------------------------------------------------------------





'The Liberal Clause': David Hedrick, Failed Congressional Candidate, Pens Children's Tea Party Christmas Book

The Huffington Post
Nick Wing First Posted: 12- 1-10 08:34 AM
Updated: 12- 1-10 09:23 AM





David Hedrick, a Tea Partier who launched an eventually unsuccessful run for Congress after achieving viral fame for a combative tirade at a town hall meeting in the summer of 2009, is supposedly out to save Christmas from Barack Obama with a new Tea Party children's book.



From the advance looks at the publication, "The Liberal Clause," looks to pick up in the same vein that his rant against retiring Rep. Brian Baird (D-Wash.) left off.



In 2009, Hedrick vehemently charged that Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi should be checking her sleeve for Nazi insignia. Now, he's toning down his message for a younger audience by telling a holiday tale of a socialist Santa, Barry "The Liberal Claus" Obama -- who is possibly not actually born in the North Pole -- and his diminutive companion "Elf Peloosi." From what he provides on the site, it looks like we can expect appearances by "Mr. Snore" (Al Gore), a Glenn Beck-watching family, Stalin, Hugo Chavez, and at least one hippie, among others.



Here's how Fox News describes the plot (caution: may contain spoilers):



Liberal Claus forces the elves to unionize, bails out the sled industry with town money, and stipulates that all children be given the same amount of toys, no matter if they've been naughty or nice.

He cites a "liberal clause" in the town's "Christmatution" that allows him to get away with all of this - along with trying to control "elf-made global warming" and forcing townsfolk to attend a church presided over by a "Reverend Blight."



In the end, one little girl defends the Christmastution and saves the town from Liberal Claus' takeover - by unplugging his teleprompter.







Fox News also reports that Hedrick's book has gotten him booked for a Christmas episode of Comedy Central's "The Daily Show."







Sasha Brown-Worsham at the Stir blog points out that this newly decided children's author is the same man who stood before a couple hundred people last summer and angrily yelled for a U.S. congressman to "stay away from my kids." Now, Hedrick is encouraging other people's kids to read a politically charged book sprinkled with some of the most controversial beliefs of the Tea Party and "birther" movements.



Also complicating matters is the fact that Hedrick is still in the midst of a legal proceeding for allegedly assaulting his wife.



The book costs $19.95, and every copy of it will come signed by Hedrick himself.





--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



You know, I could go in a thousand directions with this one. My brain is swimming in a sea of chaos. If I'm not careful, I'll be sitting in a corner mumbling to myself about how two and two make five. Yeah, this one's that much of a slam dunk.



All right...here we go...





WHAT A BUNCH OF FUCKING NONSENSE!



To my friends on the Religious Right, I apologize for my heathen outburst, but I didn't get that off my chest, I would have died from a brain anuerysm. (My blood pressure went up to the national debt over our government's unpaid liabilities, 13 trillion over 100 trillion.) With all that's been said and done by the Authoritarian Left to indoctrinate our children, I can't believe they have the unmitigated gall to complain about the Liberal Clause. It just doesn't compute. It's like the Ministry of Truth has washed away the last couple of decades of the horror that we call the public school system in the United States.



For example, in Mona Charen's Do-Gooders :





--------------------------------------------------------------------------------








"When the World War II memorial was dedicated in Washington D.C., on Memorial Day 2004, the Washington Post ran a story about what high school students knew about the war. Tiffany Charles, a B student, was typical. She could not name the president who served during World War II, nor could she name a single battle or any general. But she is quite aware the United States interned Japanese-Americans during the war. Of seventy-six students surveyed by the Post, 66 pecent knew about the Japanese-American internment but only 33 percent could name even one American general."


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------



I'm willing to bet my manhood that Tiffany Charles wasn't taught that Americans of Italian and German descent were also thrown Franklin Dictator Roosevelt's concentrat- er, uh,-internment camps. I'm also willing to bet Tiffany Charles learned all about how the military was segregated at the time, but never did learn who segregated it in the first place. (Quick, Beck fans! Who was it ? Why, that was Woodrow Wilson, the patron saint of Progressivikism!) "Who controls the past controls the future, Who controls the present controls the past", indeed. Unfortunately for America, the "who" in that famous Orwell quote has been the Progressiveviks who run our public school system for far too long.



We could go on and on, with the spooky Chairman Obama campaign song sung by children. ("We're going to spread happiness, we're gonna spread freedom. Obama's gonna change it, Obama's gonna lead 'em. We're gonna change it. And rearrange it. We're gonna change the world.") or the "Mmmm! Mmmm! Mmmm! Barack Hussein Obama" song that New Jersey kindergartners sang. We could also take trip down Memory Hole lane and reminisce about the Tides Foundation and their charming little socialist indoctrination video, The Story of Stuff, which was shown to children all over the country without parental consent or knowledge, but personally, I don't think that's healthy for you or me.



Here's the bottom line: Those who live in glass eco-houses shouldn't throw stones.





God help us all.